Support NeoGAF

[Acid08]

Hannan-Tennyson has been a disaster tonight.

 

[MetatronM]

Holy fuck Niemi

 

[Acid08]

That puck is in the net in his glove.

 

[SRTtoZ]

Its a goal but wont be counted.

 

[MetatronM]

If the puck is actually IN his glove, then that's a goal. I really can't tell if it is, though.

 

[zroid]

wow looks like a goal

not sure if it'll be overturned though

 

[Acid08]

If the puck is actually IN his glove, then that's a goal. I really can't tell if it is, though.

It is in the net. Probably will be ruled inconclusive though.

 

[Smiley90]

I don;t think that's a goal...

 

[MetatronM]

It is in the net. Probably will be ruled inconclusive though.

Yeah, I think it's in, but I don't think they call it a goal given that the call on the ice was no goal.


EDIT: This reverse angle looks pretty conclusive, actually. That's a goal.

 

[richiek]

The puck is in the glove and the glove is in the net.

 

[SRTtoZ]

goal or imma diaf

 

[Acid08]

Yeah, that should count.

 

[zroid]

yeah, figured as much

 

[richiek]

LOL refs.

 

[Acid08]

Expected. Now show some life you chumps.

 

[SRTtoZ]

Welp

 

[talisayNon]

3 d space is conclusive you dumb fuck

 

[Smiley90]

yep, figured

 

[MetatronM]

Mehhhh.

 

[Coldnoodle]

They should have a puck tracking technology.

 

[Acid08]

goal or imma diaf

LOL refs.

3 d space is conclusive you dumb fuck

yep, figured

yeah, figured as much

These quotes are telling.

 

[zroid]

3 d space is conclusive you dumb fuck

it's the viewing angle. you just can't be 100% sure unless you're looking directly from above and you can't see the puck from above. they're never going to overturn a call based on that.

 

[Jazzy Network]

They should have a puck tracking technology.

I heard Fox has that in the back somewhere.

 

[MetatronM]

JT nearly killed himself.

 

[MetatronM]

Hank going for those style points again.

 

[SRTtoZ]

was going wide

 

[Acid08]

THE BEST KARLSSON

I LOVE THIS KID

 

[zroid]

Best Karlsson!

 

[Coldnoodle]

Karlsson gonna win rookie of the year.

 

[Smiley90]

Karlsson gonna win rookie of the year.

lolno that's gonna be Forsberg hands down. MAYBE Ekblad.

 

[Acid08]

Ben Guerrero ‏@brguerrero 1m

Melker Karlsson scores in fifth straight game, tying a Sharks rookie record for consecutive games with a goal (Jeff Friesen)

 

[Terrordactyl]

lolno that's gonna be Forsberg hands down. MAYBE Ekblad.

But definitely not gaudreau.

 

[MetatronM]

So what are we thinking here, 3-2 Sharks in OT?

 

[Acid08]

So what are we thinking here, 3-2 Sharks in OT?

4-1 Rangers

 

[Smiley90]

Karlsson is shooting at like 25%. He'll calm down.

And Forsberg > rest

 

[SRTtoZ]

So what are we thinking here, 3-2 Sharks in OT?

3-1 Rangers. ENG

 

[Coldnoodle]

lolno that's gonna be Forsberg hands down. MAYBE Ekblad.

Hater.

 

[Acid08]

God damn Scott Hannan sucks.

 

[zroid]

wtf is that guy shouting about :lol

 

[MetatronM]

Real good shift along the boards from Zucc.

 

[Smiley90]

we're not really gonna get shut out by cowtown, right?

 

[Kuro Madoushi]

we're not really gonna get shut out by cowtown, right?

Flames possibly shutting out Canucks?

 

[MetatronM]

*shrug*

Shitty scribbling not mine.

 

[Acid08]

*shrug*

Shitty scribbling not mine.

lol that's conclusive proof of a goal? A small black fold in the glove?

I mean it's obviously in there but where's the 100% conclusive visual evidence?

 

[Coldnoodle]

T-Mac gonna get fired soon.

 

[zroid]

marleau :^(

T-Mac gonna get fired soon.

Shanny pls

 

[MetatronM]

lol that's conclusive proof of a goal? A small black fold in the glove?

I mean it's obviously in there but where's the 100% conclusive visual evidence?

If it's "obviously" there, then yeah, right?

I mean, evidently not, based on Toronto's ruling.

 

[SRTtoZ]

It was very likely that it was a goal but not conclusive. If they ruled it a goal instead they would have kept that ruling.

 

[Acid08]

If it's "obviously" there, then yeah, right?

I mean, evidently not, based on Toronto's ruling.

That's not how it works and you should have watched enough hockey over the years to know that. There is no angle that shows the puck cross the line. Just a lot of glove.

 

[Coldnoodle]

That's not how it works and you should have watched enough hockey over the years to know that. There is no angle that shows the puck cross the line. Just a lot of glove.

Right, but still!