• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

NHL March 2017 |OT| All in

G

Gunstar Ikari

Unconfirmed Member
Couture took a deflection to the face and fled the ice like a bat out of hell

Also, I have a feeling that the 3rd is going to be really, really nasty
 
G

Gunstar Ikari

Unconfirmed Member
Preds have a chance to leapfrog the Blues.

Not that it really matters, though; St. Louis will almost certainly end 3rd in the Central with their relatively soft schedule.
 
G

Gunstar Ikari

Unconfirmed Member
Preds win!

sPLCX65.gif

hsKjedt.gif


Thanks for playing, Sharks!
 
A

astroturfing

Member
Florida utterly destroyed Chicago in the end, goddamn. they've become my second favorite team pretty fast. i'd just like to see more Luongo..

whats the word on Jagr btw? he better be back next game!
 
S

Socreges

Banned
astroturfing said:
Florida utterly destroyed Chicago in the end, goddamn. they've become my second favorite team pretty fast. i'd just like to see more Luongo..

whats the word on Jagr btw? he better be back next game!
Click to expand...
This genuinely made me wonder, 'Wait, Jagr is Finnish?' for a split second
 
M

MetatronM

Unconfirmed Member
So the Rangers shut out the Kings with Antti Raanta becoming the first Rangers goalie to post a shutout in LA since 1978. That's the Rangers' 27th road win of the season, and it means a win of any kind against Anaheim later tonight will clinch a playoff spot (and it would all but officially clinch the first wild card spot as well).
 
P

Pikma

Banned
MetatronM said:
So the Rangers shut out the Kings with Antti Raanta becoming the first Rangers goalie to post a shutout in LA since 1978. That's the Rangers' 27th road win of the season, and it means a win of any kind against Anaheim later tonight will clinch a playoff spot (and it would all but officially clinch the first wild card spot as well).
Click to expand...
Why is this so confusing
 
F

FUBAR McDangles

Member
Wild clinched a 5th consecutive playoff spot last night with the Kings losing.

Good thing they're trending in the right direction and ready to steamroll the playoffs.
 
S

Solo

Member
It's almost starting to feel like a Vanek situation with Radulov. With each passing game he's playing himself out of term and AAV. Points in just 3 of the last 16 games.

Dude ran out of gas at like game #50.
 
S

Solo

Member
It's also interesting that the 8 western playoff teams are basically set and have been for a week now. Meanwhile in the east, there's still 4 teams with a legit shot at the last WC spot (Boston, Tampa, Isles, and suddenly the Canes are in the picture too).
 
C

CreeperBlocks

Banned
Solo said:
It's almost starting to feel like a Vanek situation with Radulov. With each passing game he's playing himself out of term and AAV. Points in just 3 of the last 16 games.

Dude ran out of gas at like game #50.
Click to expand...

I don't see a Vanek situation because Radulov actually cares about playing hockey.

Vanek is a lazy asshole, Radulov is not, even if he's not putting up points he's still hustling. He's someone we should keep on our roster because frankly our right hand side is weak if he goes
 
S

Solo

Member
CreeperBlocks said:
I don't see a Vanek situation because Radulov actually cares about playing hockey.

Vanek is a lazy asshole, Radulov is not, even if he's not putting up points he's still hustling. He's someone we should keep on our roster because frankly our right hand side is weak if he goes
Click to expand...

I'm not calling him Vanek, of course, just that his play has dipped off in the second half of the season like Vanek's did in the 2014 playoffs. He doesn't look like that unstoppable wrecking ball he was back in the first half of the season.

And of course I still want Radulov on the roster for the coming seasons, but lol at him wanting 8 years. The way he plays, I'm giving him 4 years tops. 3 would be ideal. I don't care so much about the AAV, it can be high, I just care about the term. If the Habs or any other team gives him 6+ years they are fools.
 
C

CreeperBlocks

Banned
Solo said:
I'm not calling him Vanek, of course, just that his play has dipped off in the second half of the season like Vanek's did in the 2014 playoffs. He doesn't look like that unstoppable wrecking ball he was back in the first half of the season.

And of course I still want Radulov on the roster for the coming seasons, but lol at him wanting 8 years. The way he plays, I'm giving him 4 years tops. 3 would be ideal. I don't care so much about the AAV, it can be high, I just care about the term. If the Habs or any other team gives him 6+ years they are fools.
Click to expand...

Radulov denied wanting 8 years during an interview scrum a few weeks ago.TSN690 ran the story because they thought it was true, but knowing Montreal Media someone probably made it it up to cause bullshit

I think 4 years of Radulov would be fine.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

NHL April 2017 |OT| The Previous Thread is in the Hall of Fame
58 59 60 61 62
3K
96K
zroid replied
NHL Off-Season 2017 |OT| We’ve Been Here Since October
393 394 395 396 397
20K
886K
Cactus replied
NHL Playoffs 2017 [OT] 100 Years of Playoff Salt
402 403 404 405 406
20K
662K
Quick replied
NHL Stanley Cup 2017 Finals [OT]- To Catch a Predator
89 90 91 92 93
5K
222K
Alucard replied
NHL Playoffs 2016 |OT| Clear Eyes, Full Salt, Will Lose
343 344 345 346 347
17K
546K
ShadowSoldier89 replied
Top Bottom