10 minute in 2nd?
Well, I'll take it.
Haha my buddy keeps messaging me.
"He's not gonna hit 30" in regards to Seguin.
:lol It's definitey getting nasty out there.i feel like this game is gonna turn into mutant league hockey next period.
the slo-mo replay from the other side of the glass on FSD was a great view of it. vorcek basically skates head-first into kronwall like a fucking retard.
but that's definitely a suspension based on the new rule. you can't hit guys in the head like that.
Go Flames!
the slo-mo replay from the other side of the glass on FSD was a great view of it. vorcek basically skates head-first into kronwall like a fucking retard.
but that's definitely a suspension based on the new rule. you can't hit guys in the head like that.
technically it wasn't "targeted" and he definitely put himself in a vulnerable position, but just based on the look of it i'd say a few games, minimum.
LOL at the Flyers fans in here saying Kronwall's hit was dirty. Please.
As for the Wings, they suck right now. The PP is awful and any time the defense is challenged they give up an odd-man rush.
LOL at the Wings fans saying the hit shouldn't be a penalty?
looking for someone who said it was "dirty".LOL at the Flyers fans in here saying Kronwall's hit was dirty. Please.
As for the Wings, they suck right now. The PP is awful and any time the defense is challenged they give up an odd-man rush.
now you're just being ignorantIt's NOT a penalty. His head was DOWN and Kronwall did not target the head.
It's NOT a penalty. His head was DOWN and Kronwall did not target the head.
Did you make a second bet or did you cash out at twenty?
HE HIT HIM IN THE FACE! How is that "head down?"
"Target" is the key word. Did ANY part of Kronwall's body lead out in front of him? No.
I agree with this.Looks like a suspsension under the new rule. Clean overall in terms of I don't think he was trying to scramble his eggs.. Kronwall is a bit of a headhunter though.
uh, i don't disagree with any of this.Bullshit, the dumbass had his head down, he walked (or skated I guess) right into it. Other than that, the hit was clean.
http://i.imgur.com/2RhSm.gif[IMG]
[SPOILER]I stole your gif Marvie[/SPOILER][/QUOTE]
haha
Wheres Schuey? :D
Looks like a suspsension under the new rule. Clean overall in terms of I don't think he was trying to scramble his eggs.. Kronwall is a bit of a headhunter though.
What the fuck are you talking about? Are you saying headshots can only be leaping shoulders and elbows now? You're not making any damn sense. The FIRST point of contact is his face. That's a penalty. You want the rule changed? Write Bettman.
Made the second bet on the advice of you guys.
You need to calm down.
No penalty was called because it wasn't a penalty. It's a clean hit. He probably will get suspended, but he wasn't "targeting" the head.
I'm against headshots where elbows are clearly leading and clearly meant to injure. That wasn't one of those hits.
Yea, suspensions without penalties make a lot of sense. He's gonna get off for this.
Socreges, I present this entire conversation as Exhibit A that more people agree with me than they actually realize regarding head shots. They just don't realize it until it's their team.
Holy shit Lucic you had a wide open net
So it is suspension worthy, but not penalty worthy. Got it. Makes sense. I'm not calling Kronwall dirty. I'm saying he violated the rules by committing a hit with a primary contact point at the head. That's a penalty.
EVERYONE is against the hits you're talking about. This is the EXACT argument I've had on here numerous times. The rule is more strict than that.