Agena setting after WW2 by propping money into Japan and it becoming a satellite state.
Japan is not a satellite state of the US. If anything, it has become one of the most free, peaceful and prosperous countries in the world. And the same for Germany.
In fact, both have been going against the US in ramping up their military. If it hasn't been for Russian war in Europe and Chinese aggression in South Asia, both would still be ignoring the US.
Btw, I am a Canadian/US citizen with Pakistani heritage... whoops, forgetting the rest of the atrocities in the last 50 years aren't we from destabalizing governments to installing puppet regimes and even going to different battlefields. Let's just focus on the narrative of invasion over proxy wars and coups in others that bring destabalization.
Yes, during the Cold War, both the USA and the Soviet Union were propping up regimes one against the other.
You might remember that Truman was not interested in a Cold War, but the Soviet Union was so aggressive, it gave no other choice to the USA but to participate.
In fact, the Soviet Union was so aggressive, even Communist China joined in, on the side of the USA in a few conflicts. For example, in the Angolan civil war.
But after the fall of the Soviet Union, these kind of tactics fell by the way side. Except that Russia continued to invade it's neighbors, and all of these invasions were to conquer territory. None were to remove a dictator.
Here is a nice comparison. After WW2, western Europe had zero conflicts, became prosperous and democratic.
Eastern Europe continues to have conflicts, and almost all countries have problems with extreme corruption, poverty and dictatorships.
BTW, why did you go to one of the countries on the planet, that is under the most USA influence? Maybe democracy and prosperity aren't so bad.
Oh jee, regurgitating narratives must be quite fun on what is fed to people's minds. Why isn't Saudi treated with the same equivalence? Or any of the Petro Dollar ME nations?
The first Iraq war was done under those presets. And had a support of most of the UN Nations. So, no this is not just some type of narrative.
For all the problems with Saudi Arabia, it was never as bad as Iraq under Saddam Hussein. Truth be told, the problems with Saudi Arabia, are not that different than Pakistan.
Both have terrible records in human rights. Both have problems when dealing with minorities. And both have active conflicts in their borders.
Was the second invasion of Iraq an error? Yes it was.
But one invasion from the USA does not validate other invasions from Russia. And that is the problem we have seen with Russian propaganda.
The second war on Iraq does not justify the invasion of Ukraine. Neither the invasion of Georgia. neither the invasion of Crimea.
Unless you're from that region, this wouldn't really concern you. Its just the point made that one power is benevolent while another who wants a piece of the power instantly demonized. And USA would give a shit about Ukraine unless there was vested interest within the region. Its how powers keep each other in check eg. South China Sea as well.
I'm from Europe, so this affects us. The invasion of Ukraine is the biggest war in Europe since WW2, so it's a big deal.
If Russian invasion are not stopped now, several European countries will be next. Such as Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Poland, Checoslováquia and Finland.
And if we go by Lavrov's words, even Eastern Germany is on the table.
There is a reason why so many countries are begging to enter NATO, and that reason is Russian aggression towards it's neighbors.
All the stuff you said is basically warranting a check on history and facts. Transgressions are usually tribal and ancient and seep in to the modern world. Also, Russia is not the only country who did this. Might I remind you of the Native Lands and Genocide here as well. Pot calling the kettle black.
All the stuff I said ahs been verified by historians. You might remember that the Soviet records were open for a few years, after the fall of the Soviet Union.
Gorbachev even admitted to the Holodomor, in public. So don't even try to obfuscate facts with current Russian propaganda.
There is a big diference in regards to the genocide the USA did against the Natives, and the genocides Russia. And that diference is that Russia continues to perpetrate them.
Almost every country has a dark side to their history, but some have learned from it. Others are still repeating it.
In case you didn't notice, lot's of eastern Europeans countries are seeking NATO protection, from Russia, as not to become the next victims.
Play into the propaganda, he is the ultimate dictator of the country, he can sway polls however which way he wants even if he is despised. Im just surprised how many people reprise themselves in a mind cage and don't think openly about what war is actually being waged; the one on mindshare.
Yes, Putin is a dictator and has power over the people. So did Tsar Nicolai II, but soon he was lying in a ditch, his bullet riddled with bullets.
The Russian people still have agency. They can still choose to revolt, like they did in 1917. But the fact remains that they choose not to.
We even have Russians in free European countries protesting in favor of Putin and Russia. Some even attack Ukrainian refugees.
I remember Bush having absolute support from 70+ countries and gaining popularity polls when he went to war. The only reprecussions we have later in the west is a slap on the wrist and saying sorry while looking all coy without anyone being taken in by warcrimes while others pay with their lives in the millions.
You are correct. But again, the second invasion of Iraq does not justify the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Two wrongs does not make one right.
And for all the mistakes the USA has made, supporting Ukraine in defending it self and it's people, against a Russian invasion is the right thing.
The Ukrainian people have the right to be free, they have the right to peace and to prosperity.