Nintendo Switch Dev Kit Stats Leaked? Cortex A57, 4GB RAM, 32GB Storage, Multi-Touch.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Is switch rumored to have an sd card memory expansion slot?

Some people are speculating that vicarious visions is helping Bungie to bring Destiny 2 to switch. But it's just fan speculation.

That would be a huge win for Nintendo, but I haven't heard anything from Activision people about what their level of support for the Switch is going to be. Bringing a game like Destiny 2 is a big commitment with all the DLC and patches that come along with it
 
That would be a huge win for Nintendo, but I haven't heard anything from Activision people about what their level of support for the Switch is going to be. Bringing a game like Destiny 2 is a big commitment with all the DLC and patches that come along with it

Well they just brought vicarious visions onboard to help work on Destiny and VV is a developer that has a history of working on mobile and working with Nintendo. Otherwise it's unclear how they can help with Destiny 2. That's where all the fan speculation comes from. I guess it would also depend on the early sales numbers for switch.
 
Well they just brought vicarious visions onboard to help work on Destiny and VV is a developer that has a history of working on mobile and working with Nintendo. Otherwise it's unclear how they can help with Destiny 2. That's where all the fan speculation comes from.

I'd be all for it. It is probably the only way I could see myself hopping back into the grind would be if it was released for the Switch
 
I've briefly touched upon two chips I think nintendo might be after but it's not concrete. Rather um certain people including myself are wondering if nintendo has balls on mobile1050 being cutdown some form being the gpu if not that a GTX950m is of interest to me. I wouldn't compare an AMD based chip to nvidia considering the circumstances mainly tdp and actual world performance. I don't like comparing it to X1 I'd rather take what I know and judge it vs a pc of similar specs giving it bit more performance because low level api/os and not running on bloaty windows.

This in no way is a real rumor, certainly not after certain games being shown off like zelda switch. Nor should we take it as such because both nintendo and nvidia are exceptional on keeping very robust customization to themselves. When get to see what inside retail units keep this as quote prediction if you like.

When you say X1 here, do you mean Xbox One or Tegra X1? I would imagine using Tegra X1 as the base comparison point would make the most sense here, given we know it's a Tegra line product, rather than GTX. I'd be a bit surprised if it gets to GTX950m if that's what you're predicting (unless you meant cut down version of 950m) and I think we've set fairly realistic expectations here for GPU power (~500-750 max, docked), do you think it could be likely to surpass that?

After what you've said over the past couple pages though I'm very excited to hear about the dev tools once the console releases. I'm betting properly optimized titles will be very impressive now.
 
So I was wondering if all possibility of the Supplemental Computing Device is dead, or is that still a reasonable possibility with Nvidia on board and publicly saying they expect the Nintendo partnership to last two decades.
 
He means Xbox One. He's saying he doesn't like comparing to Xbox one as its not apples to apples.

Ah gotcha, I was just a bit confused seeing the Switch SoC compared to PC chips rather than Tegra which we're used to seeing.

So I was wondering if all possibility of the Supplemental Computing Device is dead, or is that still a reasonable possibility with Nvidia on board and publicly saying they expect the Nintendo partnership to last two decades.

I'd say it's more likely for a mid gen upgrade to coincide with a new Switch tablet but that's just a guess. I don't see why they wouldn't use it at some point though, assuming the technology actually works decently.
 
Nintendo Switch |OT| Roof Top Parties Optional

It's... all I've got.

Is switch rumored to have an sd card memory expansion slot?

Some people are speculating that vicarious visions is helping Bungie to bring Destiny 2 to switch. But it's just fan speculation.

That would be a bigger win for Nintendo than GTA/RDR2, imo. Destiny on the go would be a massive success, and I would think that Bungie has learned it's lesson and made a more wieldy engine this time around that could easily support a Switch release. Lord knows if the 360/PS3 could play Destiny 1, then the Switch should absolutely be able to handle Destiny 2. My only concern is that the always-online needs of Destiny or some business BS from Activision will keep the game away from the Switch.
 
When you say X1 here, do you mean Xbox One or Tegra X1? I would imagine using Tegra X1 as the base comparison point would make the most sense here, given we know it's a Tegra line product, rather than GTX. I'd be a bit surprised if it gets to GTX950m if that's what you're predicting (unless you meant cut down version of 950m) and I think we've set fairly realistic expectations here for GPU power (~500-750 max, docked), do you think it could be likely to surpass that?

After what you've said over the past couple pages though I'm very excited to hear about the dev tools once the console releases. I'm betting properly optimized titles will be very impressive now.

I only mean cut down not full, very few other chips can really get where they are trying to go. I don't know the exact chip, but as things come about this GPU could punch 3-6x above the WiiU GPU. 5-6x is me adjusting for potential customization and improvements.

Skittzo0413 thanks for the clarification.
 
I only mean cut down not full, very few other chips can really get where they are trying to go. I don't know the exact chip, but as things come about this GPU could punch 3-6x above the WiiU GPU. 5-6x is me adjusting for potential customization and improvements.

Skittzo0413 thanks for the clarification.

Thank you for clarifying too, and I certainly understand these are predictions or expectations, not leaks or rumors. But thanks as always for sharing your thoughts!
 
I've briefly touched upon two chips I think nintendo might be after but it's not concrete. Rather um certain people including myself are wondering if nintendo has balls on mobile1050 being cutdown some form being the gpu if not that a GTX950m is of interest to me. I wouldn't compare an AMD based chip to nvidia considering the circumstances mainly tdp and actual world performance. I don't like comparing it to X1 I'd rather take what I know and judge it vs a pc of similar specs giving it bit more performance because low level api/os and not running on bloaty windows.

This in no way is a real rumor, certainly not after certain games being shown off like zelda switch. Nor should we take it as such because both nintendo and nvidia are exceptional on keeping very robust customization to themselves. When get to see what inside retail units keep this as quote prediction if you like.

Very interesting indeed :) Thanks for the reply.
 
I only mean cut down not full, very few other chips can really get where they are trying to go. I don't know the exact chip, but as things come about this GPU could punch 3-6x above the WiiU GPU. 5-6x is me adjusting for potential customization and improvements.

Skittzo0413 thanks for the clarification.
Thanks for your replies. Going by what we have been hearing, 3x the Wii U when docked is my minimum expectation for the Switch. I am also expecting titles that takes advantage of its feature set (2x fp16, possibly stronger CPU) to potentially nearly double that performance. That is still slightly below XB1 in power, which is above 7x the Wii U, but that would be great for a hybrid HH/console.
 
I only mean cut down not full, very few other chips can really get where they are trying to go. I don't know the exact chip, but as things come about this GPU could punch 3-6x above the WiiU GPU. 5-6x is me adjusting for potential customization and improvements.

Skittzo0413 thanks for the clarification.

I'd say 3x is pretty unlikely as a stock Tegra X1 is roughly 3x a WiiU. Even with no customization if it's a Tegra P1 it should be 5x a WiiU, up to 10x if FP16 can be used heavily (not sure what impact the lower precision would have on graphics in their games).
 
I'd say 3x is pretty unlikely as a stock Tegra X1 is roughly 3x a WiiU. Even with no customization if it's a Tegra P1 it should be 5x a WiiU, up to 10x if FP16 can be used heavily (not sure what impact the lower precision would have on graphics in their games).

It's a modest estimate at best. As things pan out I might up it slightly. 10x in raw specs is a bit unbelievable to me.
 
I only mean cut down not full, very few other chips can really get where they are trying to go. I don't know the exact chip, but as things come about this GPU could punch 3-6x above the WiiU GPU. 5-6x is me adjusting for potential customization and improvements.

Skittzo0413 thanks for the clarification.

Considering the Wii U's GPU is 180GFLOPS, 6x would it put right above 1 TFLOP. I'm guessing the 5-6x isn't accounting for architectural advantages of nvidia over AMD not seen on paper...

Any info on final RAM also?
 
It's a modest estimate at best. As things pan out I might up it slightly. 10x in raw specs is a bit unbelievable to me.

10x wouldn't be in raw specs, it would be only for code that can run in FP16. Raw specs I'm thinking 700-800GFLOPS when docked should be reasonable. My main concern is memory speed, given that mobile SoCs are usually 20-50 GBps...
 
Considering the Wii U's GPU is 180GFLOPS, 6x would it put right above 1 TFLOP. I'm guessing the 5-6x isn't accounting for architectural advantages of nvidia over AMD not seen on paper...

Any info on final RAM also?

I'm also very interested to hear about any information regarding the RAM.
 
Also, anyone know how much better was the Wii U's GPU over the 360? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I heard 360's GFLOPs is 230, while Wii U's 180 TFLOPS. Though Wii U's GPU is more modern and I've pretty much always heard its better than 360 and PS3(newer more efficient hardware).
 
So are the specs fake or what?

The specs in the OP are probably real in the fact that they are an off the shelf devkit you can buy from retailers. It is likely at some point in development something like it would have been used as a devkit.

Honestly the idea that there are multiple fans to the Switch is what is curious to me. A relatively tiny single fan is all it takes to keep a full powered Tegra x1 cool. So the dock having additional cooling certainly seems to indicate a power greater than a Tegra X1.
 
Also, anyone know how much better was the Wii U's GPU over the 360? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I heard 360's GFLOPs is 230, while Wii U's 180 TFLOPS. Though Wii U's GPU is more modern and I've pretty much always heard its better than 360 and PS3(newer more efficient hardware).

I think you pretty much covered it, I don't think any meaningful measurement can be provided. The difference is pretty minimal. If the GPU hadn't been downclocked, and if it had a been paired with a better CPU the difference could have been much more substantial.
 
We'll probably get at least some specs, like amount of RAM and internal memory.

Internal memory I could see. As far as I know Nintendo never officially provided RAM specs for WiiU or 3DS, though maybe the developer NDAs will expire so we'll get info from them.
 
Internal memory I could see. As far as I know Nintendo never officially provided RAM specs for WiiU or 3DS, though maybe the developer NDAs will expire so we'll get info from them.

What do you mean by RAM specs? Like speed and specifics? Nintendo was very open about having 1GB of RAM for games and 1GB of RAM for OS/Miiverse when it came to Wii U.
 
We'll probably get at least some specs, like amount of RAM and internal memory.

Nintendo hasn't put out specs since the gamecube days, when they made consoles that were roughly on par with their competition. You'll get specs from unofficial sources and leaks from developers like always.
 
Nintendo hasn't put out specs since the gamecube days, when they made consoles that were roughly on par with their competition. You'll get specs from unofficial sources and leaks from developers like always.

What Nintendo does is anyone's guess at this point with Iwata gone.. Kimishima has multiple times said specs will be talked about next year. Could be relatively detailed or it could be like the Wii U spec page that was pretty much a joke.
 
Just 30 days to go my God, tired of this speculations.

You think this will be over?

Just wait till after Switch releases, some random YouTuber is going to make up a rumour that there'll be an SCD or a console version of the Switch called the Switch Pro which will be more powerful than Scorpio and then everyone is going to go gaga over it because you'll have guys with inferiority complexes that can't brag about the Switch's graphics in comparison to PS4.
 
Nintendo hasn't put out specs since the gamecube days, when they made consoles that were roughly on par with their competition. You'll get specs from unofficial sources and leaks from developers like always.

Who revealed the Wii U RAM specs before release? I remember at least a few articles about it.

Internal memory I could see. As far as I know Nintendo never officially provided RAM specs for WiiU or 3DS, though maybe the developer NDAs will expire so we'll get info from them.

From Nintendo? We absolutely will not

http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/news/31665/wii-u-to-have-2gb-internal-memory-gpgpu-support
 
The specs in the OP are probably real in the fact that they are an off the shelf devkit you can buy from retailers. It is likely at some point in development something like it would have been used as a devkit.

Honestly the idea that there are multiple fans to the Switch is what is curious to me. A relatively tiny single fan is all it takes to keep a full powered Tegra x1 cool. So the dock having additional cooling certainly seems to indicate a power greater than a Tegra X1.

The fact that they're working so closely with Nvidia means we're getting something more powerful than the X1.
 
4 years was such a long time.. I think Nintendo did confirm the RAM before Wii U was released.

Digging up threads on gamefaqs, and it seems like the RAM for Wii U was confirmed around September 2012, which was 2 months before Wii U came out.

Before the Wii U was released, Emily Rogers notedfrom her sources that the Wii U would only have 1 to 1.5GB of RAM 4 years ago around August 2012.

However a french developer on neogaf, claimed the Wii U will have 2GB of RAM, around march 2012.

With the presentation only a month away now, and the switch releasing merely two months after, I feel pretty confident that the basic specs like storage and RAM will be revealed. If it was anything like Wii U, We should be getting some additional leaks from devs from insiders about the power. I'm sure of it.
 
4 years was such a long time.. I think Nintendo did confirm the RAM before Wii U was released.

Digging up threads on gamefaqs, and it seems like the RAM for Wii U was confirmed around September 2012, which was 2 months before Wii U came out.

Before the Wii U was released, Emily Rogers notedfrom her sources that the Wii U would only have 1 to 1.5GB of RAM 4 years ago around August 2012.

However a french developer on neogaf, claimed the Wii U will have 2GB of RAM, around march 2012.

With the presentation only a month away now, and the switch releasing merely two months after, I feel pretty confident that the basic specs like storage and RAM will be revealed. If it was anything like Wii U, We should be getting some additional leaks from devs from insiders about the power. I'm sure of it.

Iwata confirmed 2GB of RAM during the Japanese Wii U September Pre-Launch Presentation video.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom