Nintendo Switch Emulator Ryujinx's Github and Profile Have Been Deleted

Marlon Brando Movie GIF


It would be interesting if Nintendo's offer was actually as a contractor/employee to help further the Switch 2's capabilities. But I hopes and doubts are in equal quantities.
 
They got Dolphin for taking code, but they may not have looked that deep for it had it not been going to Steam.

I don't know if Nintendo (or anyone) knew iOS was coming so I'm not saying it moved their hand -but it would have had they made it that far.
 
That and Ryujinx and Yuzu are already offering what the Switch 2 is supposed to offer (higher resolutions, 60fps, and HDR). They're a direct competitor to the Switch 2.
Especially with all the pc handhelds out now. Nintendo is dumb as fuck. If you really want to end emulation release the game a few months after console on PC.
 
Someone should actually challenge them in court like the BLEEM case, and Nintendo would likely loose too.
Don't recall there being any fallout over it but did Sony ever respond over the fact that that they used PCSX ReARMed without the creators permission when they released the PS mini? I still find it hilarious in the context of the Bleem situation.
 
Not necessarily.

"Cease development, take down all the repos and downloads, sign this paper and we will let you go in peace" can qualify as an agreement just fine.

Is there a strong legal case against emulators specifically though? Like I get pirated roms or hardware mods...but an emulator specifically? I don't think it would be a slam dunk legally...

Which is why I am speculating they just offered him some large amount of money to stop?
 
Is there a strong legal case against emulators specifically though? Like I get pirated roms or hardware mods...but an emulator specifically? I don't think it would be a slam dunk legally...
Perhaps not, but in many of those cases, small groups or individuals just don't have the time or money to fight against teams of lawyers, so they rather simply give up.
 
I have to assume the source has been forked and preserved. Not that it'll matter in the short term. Switch emulation looks like it'll be dormant for the next couple of years.

Also seems certain that Nintendo are taking the Wii method for the next machine. IE tape a bunch of the previous gen machine together and call it a new product.
 
Someone should actually challenge them in court like the BLEEM case, and Nintendo would likely loose too.
In terms of Yuzu, Tropical Haze actually had pirated ROMs and got caught using them to get games working on Yuzu in parity with their official release.

This still sounds like they paid the Ryujynx team off to stop. Not sure if that's something you can take to court if you accept the pay-off.

Is there a strong legal case against emulators specifically though? Like I get pirated roms or hardware mods...but an emulator specifically? I don't think it would be a slam dunk legally...

Which is why I am speculating they just offered him some large amount of money to stop?
No there isn't, no matter how much Nintendo (and Sony) want to believe there is. They'll make the claim that it promotes piracy but there is no way to get evidence proving it, just hearsay in a court room. Again, which is why I believe the Ryujynx devs worded this the way they did. It sounds like Nintendo came to them with a form of offer, maybe a payment but we can't say, and that they decided to take it.
 
Last edited:
Is there a strong legal case against emulators specifically though? Like I get pirated roms or hardware mods...but an emulator specifically? I don't think it would be a slam dunk legally...

Which is why I am speculating they just offered him some large amount of money to stop?
You don't have to "lose" a lawsuit to lose a lawsuit. Especially one against a multinational corporation.
 
Last edited:
Well at least it kinda confirms that Switch 2 will be way more iterative than we think.

On the other hand, Mario and his lawyer squad can suck my johnson with this Yakyza-style bullying of clearly legal products. Once hanafuda company = always hanafuda company.
 
How come they do that so effortlessly now? Surely they've wanted to kill emus since the GBA or earlier and every other system was also emulated & hacked early on, why are they so efficient now? Surely they tried before too, they had a big crack down on rom sites year past as well, so what changed since then? I imagine how openly they're monetised nowadays is a factor, though donations and what not aren't exactly a new thing either so yeah, what else is different?

Edit: jesus folks responding to me with why N want emus dead, Switch 2, back compat, duh, of course they do, just like Sony when they killed Bleem!, I'm asking what changed to make it so easy vs any time before that they still wanted it (and were already big and greedy, were you born yesterday?).
 
Last edited:
Is there a strong legal case against emulators specifically though? Like I get pirated roms or hardware mods...but an emulator specifically? I don't think it would be a slam dunk legally...

Which is why I am speculating they just offered him some large amount of money to stop?
On a high level, emulators are in the safe zone... As long as you're reverse engineering, and not using stolen code, or BIOS, or things like that. But I also think a company that wants to make life hell for an emu maker can.
 
Lol, no it wasn't. It's an old Tegra X1 from 2015.

Cmon man...it was underpowered even for 2017 what are we talking about here...the damn thing has games that don't hit 1080p...

I love my switch and especially the games but lets not act like it's some impressive piece of tech...
Can either of you name one affordable mobile device from 2017 that was capable of playing console-level games for more than two hours without thermal throttling like crazy besides the Switch?

The answer is no. For it's time it was a genuinely solid piece of hardware. Saying "ERM ACKTUALLY ITS A 2015 NVIDIA CHIP" is irrelevant and evidence you don't really understand what you're talking about. You do realize most consoles and mobile handhelds tend to use off-the-shelf components as a base that are already dated upon release, right? The original Xbox was a complete powerhouse for a console at launch and yet it was a generation behind the Pentium 4 on the PC side.
Even then, the Nvidia Tegra was incredibly powerful and efficient compared to other ARM solutions, so it being a few years in at that point didn't really matter.

I think the Switch is incredibly dated and long in the tooth at this point, but you can't really argue that Nintendo did the best they could do for an affordable handheld console. Newer Nvidia chips would've been far too costly and most likely not as efficient for what Nintendo was trying to achieve. Asking 1080p out of even 2017 mobile hardware was far too demanding. Even a 2022 Steam Deck x86-64 APU can't really achieve this well, and it's far more powerful.
 
Last edited:
The good news is Ryujinx is already very stable, feature complete, and can run virtually all Nintendo Switch titles reasonably well.


Even if no one picks up the reigns for development and/or no forks are created (which I doubt), Ryujinx will remain a great go-to Switch emulator in perpetuity.

Kenjinx will be up on GitHub next week, don't worry.
 
Nintendo are pricks. The guy probably did nothing illegal (unlike Yuzu devs) and just doesn't want to deal with lawyers and court dates. Oh well, Ryujinx as it exists today will never go away and works nearly flawlessly.
 
Sounds less like a DMCA take down and more like a pay off. Since these guys weren't sharing ROM files, Nintendo probably couldn't go after them legally. Didn't think they'd go this route for it.
Well that's how Sony killed VGS back in the day. Sued them, they were bleeding out and then bought them. They just sued Bleem! until it bled out and died. VGS was a much better emulator though.

That's the easiest way for companies to deal with stuff like this, bleed them out or buy them, they have no actual legal case otherwise. Just flat out offering them money to fuck off somehow wasn't what I was expecting though....Unless it was, "Fuck off, or fuck around and find out"
 
Russ from the YouTube channel retro game corps also got 2 copyright strikes from Nintendo of Japan over this past few days. Nintendo is at it again. In the USA what the YouTubers film is under fair use clause but in Japan there is no fair use so that's why NOJ are attacking people
 
Last edited:
A lesson for anyone attempting this in future.

Squeaky clean code,

decentralized repositories,

no discord (seriously why do they keep doing this? It's a hive for piracy talk and only attracts the wrong kind of attention),

stay as anonymous as possible.

Don't be living in a DMCA country
 
Last edited:
So I guess the moral of the story is that you can expect to get a big payout as long as you are the administrator of a popular enough Switch emulator.
 
All these are good indicators that their next console is going to suck hardware wise, and will be easy to emulate. Rather than going for a more powerful, more difficult to emulate hardware, they most certainly went cheap and are suing everybody to protect their next product.
Nailed it.


95b49n.jpg
 
Don't be living in a DMCA country
Mig Switch creators are from Russia and I guess a lot of Nintendo scene will move there because Nintendo won't and reach it with it's own division closed and shut.

Я почти уверен, что эмуляторы Switch уже вовсю раздаются на торрент-трекерах по всему СНГ.

hehehehe
 
All this did was remind me to download the latest versions for Windows and Linux.

Thanks Nintendo I guess.
 
These emulators got too good too early. I've "seen" Mario games and Cruis'n Blast (the best Nintendo switch game of all time) running on a steam deck perfectly. Nintendo can't let that slide.
 
How come they do that so effortlessly now? Surely they've wanted to kill emus since the GBA or earlier and every other system was also emulated & hacked early on, why are they so efficient now? Surely they tried before too, they had a big crack down on rom sites year past as well, so what changed since then? I imagine how openly they're monetised nowadays is a factor, though donations and what not aren't exactly a new thing either so yeah, what else is different?
They got big and greedy after the switch
 
Can either of you name one affordable mobile device from 2017 that was capable of playing console-level games for more than two hours without thermal throttling like crazy besides the Switch?

The answer is no. For it's time it was a genuinely solid piece of hardware. Saying "ERM ACKTUALLY ITS A 2015 NVIDIA CHIP" is irrelevant and evidence you don't really understand what you're talking about. You do realize most consoles and mobile handhelds tend to use off-the-shelf components as a base that are already dated upon release, right? The original Xbox was a complete powerhouse for a console at launch and yet it was a generation behind the Pentium 4 on the PC side.
Even then, the Nvidia Tegra was incredibly powerful and efficient compared to other ARM solutions, so it being a few years in at that point didn't really matter.

I think the Switch is incredibly dated and long in the tooth at this point, but you can't really argue that Nintendo did the best they could do for an affordable handheld console. Newer Nvidia chips would've been far too costly and most likely not as efficient for what Nintendo was trying to achieve. Asking 1080p out of even 2017 mobile hardware was far too demanding. Even a 2022 Steam Deck x86-64 APU can't really achieve this well, and it's far more powerful.
Yes I suppose if we're talking about it as a mobile device,which granted it is...then yes in 2017 it was good but I guess I compare it more as a classic console tech as I use it in dock mode primarily. I don't mind games being underpowered as a portable but the docked mode should've easily pushed 1080p in 2017 which is where my dissapointment stems from.

So yes as a portable it's impressive for 2017,I agree.

As a docked console though it's not great.

Which I hope they focus a bit on with Switch 2,make a more expensive docked version thats more powerful.
 
Last edited:
Is there a strong legal case against emulators specifically though? Like I get pirated roms or hardware mods...but an emulator specifically? I don't think it would be a slam dunk legally...

Which is why I am speculating they just offered him some large amount of money to stop?
I don't really think that the legal case itself and its strength matters here.

The question here is simple: "There's a chance you might win, but do you really want to risk losing everything for it?"

No one wants to be the guy who suffers immeasurably so we can all post about how great the ruling he got was for Emulation.

The calculus gets even worse when you're the guy who did it for the streets and then lost.

No one online will help you if you fuck around with Nintendo and find out, so most people go along to get along.
 
How come they do that so effortlessly now? Surely they've wanted to kill emus since the GBA or earlier and every other system was also emulated & hacked early on, why are they so efficient now? Surely they tried before too, they had a big crack down on rom sites year past as well, so what changed since then? I imagine how openly they're monetised nowadays is a factor, though donations and what not aren't exactly a new thing either so yeah, what else is different?
It's backcompat.

Backcompat and having all the games in one big unified ever-expanding market means that games retain their original value to the publisher even after they move on to making new systems.

In 8 years, Super Mario Odyssey won't stop being valuable to Nintendo because they're about to launch Switch 3, no, they will want to continue making money on it.

Sony will come for the Bloodborne guys too, the only reason they're waiting is to be able to seize actually working code for emulation and fixes instead of a wonky one that will cost them more money.
 
Top Bottom