analog_future
Resident Crybaby
nope
Last edited:
Sounds less like a DMCA take down and more like a pay off. Since these guys weren't sharing ROM files, Nintendo probably couldn't go after them legally. Didn't think they'd go this route for it.![]()
It's done.
Especially with all the pc handhelds out now. Nintendo is dumb as fuck. If you really want to end emulation release the game a few months after console on PC.That and Ryujinx and Yuzu are already offering what the Switch 2 is supposed to offer (higher resolutions, 60fps, and HDR). They're a direct competitor to the Switch 2.
Not necessarily."an agreement"? This sounds like they maybe paid him to take it down?
Don't recall there being any fallout over it but did Sony ever respond over the fact that that they used PCSX ReARMed without the creators permission when they released the PS mini? I still find it hilarious in the context of the Bleem situation.Someone should actually challenge them in court like the BLEEM case, and Nintendo would likely loose too.
![]()
Bleem! - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Not necessarily.
"Cease development, take down all the repos and downloads, sign this paper and we will let you go in peace" can qualify as an agreement just fine.
Perhaps not, but in many of those cases, small groups or individuals just don't have the time or money to fight against teams of lawyers, so they rather simply give up.Is there a strong legal case against emulators specifically though? Like I get pirated roms or hardware mods...but an emulator specifically? I don't think it would be a slam dunk legally...
In terms of Yuzu, Tropical Haze actually had pirated ROMs and got caught using them to get games working on Yuzu in parity with their official release.Someone should actually challenge them in court like the BLEEM case, and Nintendo would likely loose too.
![]()
Bleem! - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
No there isn't, no matter how much Nintendo (and Sony) want to believe there is. They'll make the claim that it promotes piracy but there is no way to get evidence proving it, just hearsay in a court room. Again, which is why I believe the Ryujynx devs worded this the way they did. It sounds like Nintendo came to them with a form of offer, maybe a payment but we can't say, and that they decided to take it.Is there a strong legal case against emulators specifically though? Like I get pirated roms or hardware mods...but an emulator specifically? I don't think it would be a slam dunk legally...
Which is why I am speculating they just offered him some large amount of money to stop?
You don't have to "lose" a lawsuit to lose a lawsuit. Especially one against a multinational corporation.Is there a strong legal case against emulators specifically though? Like I get pirated roms or hardware mods...but an emulator specifically? I don't think it would be a slam dunk legally...
Which is why I am speculating they just offered him some large amount of money to stop?
You don't have to "lose" a lawsuit to lose a lawsuit. Especially one against a multinational corporation.
On a high level, emulators are in the safe zone... As long as you're reverse engineering, and not using stolen code, or BIOS, or things like that. But I also think a company that wants to make life hell for an emu maker can.Is there a strong legal case against emulators specifically though? Like I get pirated roms or hardware mods...but an emulator specifically? I don't think it would be a slam dunk legally...
Which is why I am speculating they just offered him some large amount of money to stop?
Lol, no it wasn't. It's an old Tegra X1 from 2015.
Can either of you name one affordable mobile device from 2017 that was capable of playing console-level games for more than two hours without thermal throttling like crazy besides the Switch?Cmon man...it was underpowered even for 2017 what are we talking about here...the damn thing has games that don't hit 1080p...
I love my switch and especially the games but lets not act like it's some impressive piece of tech...
If they keep pulling shit like this, all emulation is going to move to the dark web.
The good news is Ryujinx is already very stable, feature complete, and can run virtually all Nintendo Switch titles reasonably well.
Even if no one picks up the reigns for development and/or no forks are created (which I doubt), Ryujinx will remain a great go-to Switch emulator in perpetuity.
Well that's how Sony killed VGS back in the day. Sued them, they were bleeding out and then bought them. They just sued Bleem! until it bled out and died. VGS was a much better emulator though.Sounds less like a DMCA take down and more like a pay off. Since these guys weren't sharing ROM files, Nintendo probably couldn't go after them legally. Didn't think they'd go this route for it.
Would explain why Nintendo is even more hostile to emulation than usual these days.It's as if switch 2 games are going to work on current switch emulators.
Nailed it.All these are good indicators that their next console is going to suck hardware wise, and will be easy to emulate. Rather than going for a more powerful, more difficult to emulate hardware, they most certainly went cheap and are suing everybody to protect their next product.
Mig Switch creators are from Russia and I guess a lot of Nintendo scene will move there because Nintendo won't and reach it with it's own division closed and shut.Don't be living in a DMCA country
They got big and greedy after the switchHow come they do that so effortlessly now? Surely they've wanted to kill emus since the GBA or earlier and every other system was also emulated & hacked early on, why are they so efficient now? Surely they tried before too, they had a big crack down on rom sites year past as well, so what changed since then? I imagine how openly they're monetised nowadays is a factor, though donations and what not aren't exactly a new thing either so yeah, what else is different?
Yes I suppose if we're talking about it as a mobile device,which granted it is...then yes in 2017 it was good but I guess I compare it more as a classic console tech as I use it in dock mode primarily. I don't mind games being underpowered as a portable but the docked mode should've easily pushed 1080p in 2017 which is where my dissapointment stems from.Can either of you name one affordable mobile device from 2017 that was capable of playing console-level games for more than two hours without thermal throttling like crazy besides the Switch?
The answer is no. For it's time it was a genuinely solid piece of hardware. Saying "ERM ACKTUALLY ITS A 2015 NVIDIA CHIP" is irrelevant and evidence you don't really understand what you're talking about. You do realize most consoles and mobile handhelds tend to use off-the-shelf components as a base that are already dated upon release, right? The original Xbox was a complete powerhouse for a console at launch and yet it was a generation behind the Pentium 4 on the PC side.
Even then, the Nvidia Tegra was incredibly powerful and efficient compared to other ARM solutions, so it being a few years in at that point didn't really matter.
I think the Switch is incredibly dated and long in the tooth at this point, but you can't really argue that Nintendo did the best they could do for an affordable handheld console. Newer Nvidia chips would've been far too costly and most likely not as efficient for what Nintendo was trying to achieve. Asking 1080p out of even 2017 mobile hardware was far too demanding. Even a 2022 Steam Deck x86-64 APU can't really achieve this well, and it's far more powerful.
I don't really think that the legal case itself and its strength matters here.Is there a strong legal case against emulators specifically though? Like I get pirated roms or hardware mods...but an emulator specifically? I don't think it would be a slam dunk legally...
Which is why I am speculating they just offered him some large amount of money to stop?
It's backcompat.How come they do that so effortlessly now? Surely they've wanted to kill emus since the GBA or earlier and every other system was also emulated & hacked early on, why are they so efficient now? Surely they tried before too, they had a big crack down on rom sites year past as well, so what changed since then? I imagine how openly they're monetised nowadays is a factor, though donations and what not aren't exactly a new thing either so yeah, what else is different?
Will PM youIf someone find a newer version then 09/22 you guys let's me know![]()