Smashing Pumpkins are great if you ignore most of their lyrics (much like NIN) but Billy Corgan is such an insane egomaniac that I think it just makes me happy by proxy to see you feel the need to troll APC/Tool threads. It's like a great reminder that this wouldn't be happening if Corgan hadn't single-handedly destroyed 2 bands full of talented individuals who could have continued to make great music.
What? The lyrics in the Pumpkins were great. Corgan is without a doubt one of the best artists around today, musically and lyrically (though recently he's been a lot stronger lyrically, even if a bit corny at times). He has wrote more amazing lyrics than he has cliche or dull, to call him a bad songwriter is absurd.
Billy did not single-handedly destroy two bands, SP fell apart. Darcy was a drug addict and quit without notice, James got tired of it, Jimmy wanted to start a family (which doesn't help Zwan much later on), Billy too was sick of it altogether, and they were tired of Virgin screwing them over. Zwan didn't work not only because of Corgan's stubborn attitude, but because you had two mainstream people, Billy and Jimmy, and then Paz who joined and probably slept with half the band (that always screws things up). Then you had Matt and Dave, two INDIE rockers. You can't mix all those talented musicians up and expect it to last. One of the first reasons could very well be Corgan's attitude in the studio, but regardless, the band would have never lasted even if he let everyone have as much contribution to the album as they wanted. They're all too different. Sluts, indie snobs and mainstream artists don't mix too well, especially in a studio; there's really no need to expalin why.
Uh..... I read the words you typed, but they make no sense to me.
REAL ALTERNATIVE ROCK BAND. I assume you're talking about multi-million selling mainstream band The Smashing Pumpkins.
Uh... maybe you are stupid, then. Mainstream bands from last decade can't be real? Compared to mainstream rock bands today, yeah, SP is a lot more real than these stupid bands are. Real in the sense that they really really cared about the music they were making. Not recycling the same riffs and lyrics like today's top mainstream bands do, like Linkin Park, Staind or Korn. SP was willing to fall on their own sword for the sake of artistic integrity (Adore is proof of that). No band would do that today, and if they do they're still indie so it really doesn't matter anyway.
CURRENT GOTH ROCK BAND TRYING TO ACT LIKE THEIR INFLUENCES DID 10+ YEARS AGO: Hmm... yeah, I do listen to a lot of goth rock bands that are aping 10 + year old acts. Oh wait, I DON'T. Yeah, the Shins, Polyphonic Spree and Gary Jules sure are GOTHIC.
Sorry, I thought you were kissing APC's ass like every other SP basher on this forum.
Maybe you're just upset about your continued inability to support your supposition that Billy Corgan is anything more than a hack, and that's why you've decided to libel me with scurrilous accusations. Hey, I can understand. I've backed some losing horses in my time before as well, but I've ALWAYS, ALWAYS admitted they were losers and just moved on. Maybe you should consider doing the same!
Oh stop. I've already admitted that Corgan clearly has some issues, especially right now. So there's no need for your first sentence there. You're just trying to tear me down because you have nothing else better to do. Corgan's far from a loser, he released the best selling double album of the 90's. It may have been angsty and had a couple filler tracks on it, but he still accomplished that regardless, and it's still superior to the shit you hear on the radio today.
But yeah, I have no problem in saying that a LOT of bands, be them mainstream or indie, from the early/mid 90's are so much more REAL than current mainstream/indie bands today. Smashing Pumpkins happen to be one of those bands; when you compare the mainstream today to what the Pumpkins were doing last decade, they slaughter them. A lot of people may not think so, but I do. And that's my opinion. If you don't like it, I don't care. I'm sick and tired of people thinking SP is the only band I listen to; the only reason why I get into these STUPID and POINTLESS arguments over a fucking BAND that broke up in 2000 is because if it's one thing I hate, it's being attacked for no reason, so I'll see to it that you don't get away with trolling me. Not without a good fight. There is no need for this constant picking on me because I happen to think that Smashing Pumpkins were and still are the best in the world. Take your inefficent bickering somewhere else, I'm sick and tired of it. Quite simply: get a life. Because ours is too short to sit here and type lines of text on a forum over pretentious bands led by bald men with good drummers. If I make a comment that pisses you off, put up with it unless it seems personal. I say one general thing about something and people like you get up in my face about it. I'm sick and tired of it.
Oh, and Trippingmartian has named the only non-criticizable album in the entire thread.
Riiiight. See my first post in this thread.