plagiarize said:alright then try this one.
what mp3 player sold more than apple's top of the line iPod?
Not Sony's network walkman for sure.
plagiarize said:alright then try this one.
what mp3 player sold more than apple's top of the line iPod?
so the wii remote is *trying* to **** up genres? that's an interesting opinion.Kabuki Waq said:huh? when did i say that. The guitar controller is ONLY used for one game. Atleast one type of game....its not trying to **** up other Genres with its controller.
Needs to be quoted again for the truth.Boilerbird said:In all honesty, Sony, and to a much lesser extent Microsoft, have advanced technology to the point where it's no longer feasible for the average game consumer to purchase one of their consoles. People here are complaining that the rise of Nintendo means that there won't be any new advances in hardware. That isn't true. It just means advances in hardware will, in the future, more closely follow what consumers will pay for that hardware.
In short, the market can't support Sony's $600 price. That much is blatantly obvious. HD graphics and enhanced DVD (Blu-ray) should've been released when Sony could price it at $300/console. The Wii pretty much came in and took Sony's market, because Sony decided not to sell to their market anymore.
RetroElectro said:But you forget why ipod became the ruler. It wasn't because of a product lineup. They won because it had the best ease of use and design. There are many tech heads, myself included, that did not buy an ipod because it didn't offer things like gapless playback, digital audio out, color, etc. We bought our irivers and cowons but had to suffer with poor UI and firmware. (Thank god for RockBox.) Which system is differentiating itself from the others with it's intuitive controller and slim design? Not Sony.
firefoxsux said:This is not spin.
Playstation = iPod
Playstation have ps1, ps2, ps3, psp
iPod have 1G 2G 3G mini shuffle nano
It is a happy family. ps3 will soar in 2007-2008. iPod launch was expensive and sold less to Creative.
who won the ruler of mp3?
Merovingian said:Sorry [snip]
Sorry if i ...[snip] Sorry if i don't...[snip]
I'm sorry ..[snip]
I'm terribly sorry.
The Sphinx said:Well, 6-1/2 years is extraordinary even for market leaders and we shouldn't expect ANYthing to match it. It could continue to dominate for another three years, get retired in favor of the DS2/Game Boy Awesome/whatever, and still be significantly behind the PS2.
But to answer your question more directly: DS probably won't last as long as PS2's lifespan because Nintendo will replace it with a competent successor.
Merovingian said:How can i explain that i wouldn't expect a grown up man spending his own time alone playing a game about making surgeries. I can't explain how he wouldn't be interested in fighting princess peach in SMb.
ecause i can't tell you why i wouldn't expect a grown up to walk into a theatre to watch Cars on his own.
plagiarize said:so the wii remote is *trying* to **** up genres? that's an interesting opinion.
That is right on the money.Boilerbird said:Didn't we have this very same argument in the PSP/DS wars, back when they were competitive? "OMFG NON-GAMES ARE RUINING THE INDUSTRY," etc. etc.?
In all honesty, Sony, and to a much lesser extent Microsoft, have advanced technology to the point where it's no longer feasible for the average game consumer to purchase one of their consoles. People here are complaining that the rise of Nintendo means that there won't be any new advances in hardware. That isn't true. It just means advances in hardware will, in the future, more closely follow what consumers will pay for that hardware.
In short, the market can't support Sony's $600 price. That much is blatently obvious. HD graphics and enhanced DVD (Blu-ray) should've been released when Sony could price it at $300/console. The Wii pretty much came in and took Sony's market, because Sony decided not to sell to their market anymore.
GitarooMan said:I don't see him saying the momentum is slowing down, more that the system won't last for another 4.5 years, I think it will most likely be replaced by then.
Boilerbird said:Didn't we have this very same argument in the PSP/DS wars, back when they were competitive? "OMFG NON-GAMES ARE RUINING THE INDUSTRY," etc. etc.?
In all honesty, Sony, and to a much lesser extent Microsoft, have advanced technology to the point where it's no longer feasible for the average game consumer to purchase one of their consoles. People here are complaining that the rise of Nintendo means that there won't be any new advances in hardware. That isn't true. It just means advances in hardware will, in the future, more closely follow what consumers will pay for that hardware.
In short, the market can't support Sony's $600 price. That much is blatently obvious. HD graphics and enhanced DVD (Blu-ray) should've been released when Sony could price it at $300/console. The Wii pretty much came in and took Sony's market, because Sony decided not to sell to their market anymore.
Someone will. Microsoft has some incentive to encroach a little bit into Nintendo territory, perhaps in another convergence device (MP3/phone/camera/organizer/game system). While toppling Nintendo probably wouldn't be their main objective I could see them pushing the XBox brand as a weapon in their on-going war with Apple's iPod, and then Nintendo would have to respond.Pureauthor said:The only reason Nintendo released the GBC, the GBA, and the DS was to directly respond to a new challenger to the handheld throne. Otherwise, we saw how they milked the Gameboy.
PSP just got beat down - who else would be foolhardy enough to try and take on Nintendo in the portable realm now?
GhaleonEB said:World-wide or in the US? WW, definately. US, probably not. It outsold the 360 by 100k - it's going to take a long time for it to catch up at that rate, and we know the 360 will drop in price soon.
go back to playing your commodore 64.
you said it was *trying* to mess up genres. something which i can't accept at all.Kabuki Waq said:only Genres that require precise timing and controls.
If SSB: BRAW was using the Wiimote there would have been Riots? Why is it not using the Wiimote you think? it is one of the biggest games.
greatest generation ever bitches!PleoMax said:
Kabuki Waq said:only Genres that require precise timing and controls.
If SSB: BRAW was using the Wiimote there would have been Riots? Why is it not using the Wiimote you think? it is one of the biggest games.
sonycowboy said:It won't catch the 360 this year, as it's behind by 3.2M units, but the Wii is still supply constrained. It probably could have outsold the 360 by much, much more. We have to wait until units stay on shelves to know what the support level by month will be.
We have very good data that suggest that the 360 is going to sell 50-55k/week until either a price drop hits or something signficant with the platform happens. You can look at the release schedule and hope for a bump, but that hasn't happened in the past 8 months despite some pretty big releases (FN R3, Oblivion, GRAW, Madden, Dead Rising, Saints Row, Gears of War, Lost Planet, and Crackdown), so I don't see it happening until at least Halo.
If the Wii can maintain a 80/week in the US this year, it would catch up on the 360 by ~120-150k per non-holiday month in the US and probably by 20k month in Canada based on current results. And then what happens once we hit October-December?
That would let it catch up 1M units before October and who knows how the year would end out?
Again, it almost certainly won't catch the 360 this year in the US, but it will in Europe and worldwide and could pass the 360 sometime in 2008 in the US.
Based on current trends (which can change based on a variety of events/factors)
REV 09 said:i think that for the most part, gamers under the age of 14 are playing the wii and ds while gamers over that age are playing the 360 and ps2. I think it's great that these 2 systems are targeting two separate markets and performing extremely well in those markets. Again, i do understand that i'm generalizing the markets and that there are many exceptions.
the best analogy i think would be the sony fans fighting valiantly against overwhelming odds.Vagabundo said:So who is the Spartans?
firefoxsux said:don have mp3 mpd data.
who is applecowboy? beep hoink hoink. we need applecowboy!
sonycowboy said:Again, it almost certainly won't catch the 360 this year in the US, but it will in Europe and worldwide and could pass the 360 sometime in 2008 in the US.
Based on current trends (which can change based on a variety of events/factors)
Pureauthor said:PSP just got beat down - who else would be foolhardy enough to try and take on Nintendo in the portable realm now?
and as we're seeing now, and have seen in the past, no one is untouchable.Arsenal said:Seeing as how Sony makes a nice profit on the PSP, I'm sure they are going to remain "foolhardy" and continue to stay in the market making money. I'm sure they cringe when they see the absurd numbers that the DS is putting up, but as long as the accountants in the back room are seeing black numbers you can count this as a success for Sony.
I'm sure MS is also targeting the handheld market as well. Nobody is going to touch the DS this gen (and probably next too), but that doesn't mean there isn't money to be made and value to be had by establishing a portable platform even if you are not the market leader. The handheld market is only going to get more important in the future and this isn't something that MS is going to walk away from.
soul creator said:It probably won't happen, but I'd love to see if MS could reach a point before the end of the year where they can comfortably sell the core 360 for $199, (ideally with HD cables and the small memory card included). They will have been out for 2 years in November, so I would imagine there'll be some sort of cost reduction on the 360. I guess the reason I'll be curious is because everyone's saying Sony and to a lesser extent MS has priced themselves out the market, which is true...but MS is pretty much a price drop away from "mass market".
It'd be interesting to see how the Wii and 360 would match up if they're roughly similar prices. In this way, you'll pretty much always know that customers are making a direct "gaming philosophy I like" decision rather than "damn it costs too much" decision. Oh, and this idea would require the elimination of the "premium" system and having all hard drives be sold separately. That way people can't look at the 360 and say "well, the real price is $299...". If there's only one model for $199, then they pretty much have to look at it as that price
plagiarize said:you said it was *trying* to mess up genres. something which i can't accept at all.
the wii remote is a great alternative (arguably better) for many genres out there, but obviously it isn't superior for ALL games.
that's why the classic controller exists though.
i can verify this [anecdotally only, of course]. i have so many non-gamer friends talking about it just out of the blue. people i've known for awhile who never play games are going to parties with Wii's and this game and now it's all they talk about. hell, just the other day some girls from my class i was talking to just randomly went off about how awesome it was. i was pretty shocked.schuelma said:Wii Sports! Wii Sports!!! I'm telling you...this is a effing KILLER AP.
Wiitard said:Well, Sony is also one price cut away from mass market. Just cut the price of 20 gig to, say, 300.
So Microsoft cuts price of core to 199. before is was going to sell x million consoles at a profit p. Now they are selling a x+y million consoles at a loss of at least $100 for console.
You get a bunch of people buying the core and never downloading arcade games, never buying life - very profitable customers.
So how much do you they would sell with core at $199? Say 15 million? That is a loss of 1.5 billion. How much would they have sold without that (you know, Halo 3 coming and all that)? At least some 7 million, right. And now they are making something like $40 on hardware (premium). So they go from a profit of 280 million to a loss of 1.5 billion in just one year. That is HALF of what they invested in the original Xbox right there. In just the first year of this brilliant policy. Yeah, core at 199 for the win...
Kabuki Waq said:which Genre has the wiimote actually proved to be better for?
mini games dont count as a genre.
Oblivion said:People are STILL comparing PS3 to ipod?
shpankey said:i can verify this [anecdotally only, of course]. i have so many non-gamer friends talking about it just out of the blue. people i've known for awhile who never play games are going to parties with Wii's and this game and now it's all they talk about. hell, just the other day some girls from my class i was talking to just randomly went off about how awesome it was. i was pretty shocked.
anyhow, i really like the precedent that selling a console at this price sets [poor sales]. i want every manufacturer of all consoles in the future to KNOW that pricing a new system at this ridiculous price is suicide. i had thought they learned with the 3DO, but alas.... here we are.
time for that price drop now Sony. i wonder if their ego is so huge that they will refuse to drop the price for fear of it seeming like a reaction to these poor sales.
Pureauthor said:Well, thus far, simulation games.
Trauma Centre is <3.
Kabuki Waq said:which Genre has the wiimote actually proved to be better for?
mini games dont count as a genre.
TheGreatDave said:Zelda?
Kabuki Waq said:which Genre has the wiimote actually proved to be better for?
mini games dont count as a genre.
RTS games. racing games (though those are just as good on the SIXAXIS with motion control). point and click adventure games. football games (based on madden reviews).Kabuki Waq said:which Genre has the wiimote actually proved to be better for?
mini games dont count as a genre.
Kabuki Waq said:which Genre has the wiimote actually proved to be better for?
mini games dont count as a genre.
February, with consumers snapping up virtually every system available in America totaling more than 335,000 units.
Kabuki Waq said:simulation games? WTF is that? only TRauma centre? you told me Wiimote is better for MANY genres and all you could come up with is TRauma Centre? Medical Simulation Genre?
No idea, but I'm 24 and own both a DS and a Wii, no 360, no PS2 (I lapsed and went PC from ~'95 to 2006 with the euro release of the DS Lite).Tim the Wiz said:Do people (or more importantly, publishers) honestly believe this?
Fact: Trauma Center would be utterly unplayable on a 360 or a PS3.Kabuki Waq said:simulation games? WTF is that? only TRauma centre? you told me Wiimote is better for MANY genres and all you could come up with is TRauma Centre? Medical Simulation Genre?