• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

NPD Sales Results for March 2013 [Up5: BioShock Infinite]

honestly, they're just keeping it afloat until the ps4 comes out and they can position it as a fancy peripheral, i think. if that fails, then the system will just quietly be silenced in early 2015.

it's not like it hasn't had anything that has done well. it's gaining some support in japan, slowly. it just wont ever be what the psp was.

Yep that's looking like the plan
 

Road

Member
Good enough for government work:
npdzkx1g.png

(67 actually fits better than 68, changed that after taking the picture)

lol

I was doing the same, but changing the numbers on Excel itself.

npdchartpieyty5w.png
 

kinggroin

Banned
There's been bugger all to play on both systems, post launch. And whatever there has been has had next to no awareness at all. They are both in dire need of system sellers.


Bullshit.

There's stuff to play, for both platforms in fact. It just happens to be the kind of games that many feel, uh, aren't worth playing?
 

chubigans

y'all should be ashamed
The difference being Vita could disappear from shelves tomorrow and it wouldn't impact Sony all that much. For the Wii U to be performing this badly, and no relief in sight, is so bad for Nintendo that I honestly don't know what they'll do.
 
When it comes to the poor Wii U and Vita sales, do most people here thing it's more due to the marketing or the hardware not being appropriate for the market (high price of Vita, Wii U gamepad, etc.)?

There is no market for either.

For Wii U:

Hardcore gamers have 360s and PS3s and don't want to spend $350 on a similarly powered console with Durango and PS4 on the horizon.

Casual gamers stopped playing their Wii's years ago and don't give a shit about the Wii U.

Nintendo fans will buy anything Nintendo makes, but in the home console space there are only so many of them around and they seemingly are a shrinking demographic.

The Vita is a nice piece of tech, but who is it selling to exactly? Hardcore gamers? Great but they can't carry a system. Casuals have moved on to tablets. Kids have 3DS'. Teens and young adults can play console style games at home, on a console.
 
honestly, they're just keeping it afloat until the ps4 comes out and they can position it as a fancy peripheral, i think. if that fails, then the system will just quietly be silenced in early 2015.

it's not like it hasn't had anything that has done well. it's gaining some support in japan, slowly. it just wont ever be what the psp was.

I am sad because this appears to be the case. The world doesn't want the Vita, but I do.
 

Metallix87

Member
Why talk about the future when we're analyzing March 2013 sales data? Right now the Wii U is competing with the PS3 and 360, and it's failing miserably. Yes, clearly my analysis will change once Sony and Microsoft release their next generation consoles.

It's still a poor comparison, then, since Wii U is a new system, it's still at least a bit more powerful than 360 / PS3, and it's using a pricey new controller that offers up new gameplay possibilities.
 
This is where we're at now? Now we are hoping a game company fails just because they don't make stuff we like.
Nintendo should fail because they didn't learn to make their console cheap enough for what they offer.

Sony should fail because they won't make their console cheap enough for what they offer.

Microsoft should fail because they won't make their console cheap enough for what they offer. Also always online.





I don't know what else you would attribute to the Wii-U's debacle short of sheer incompetence.

Nintendo really thought they had something with the Wii-U because they lived in a bubble. The casual audience that made the Wii so successful is not coming back, and many core gamers like myself are waiting for Nintendo to actually release the games they want.

Nintendo reaps what they sow.
Of course yes this core-casual fallacy is the best way to explain why no one wants the Wii U.




Don't see why it's so weird to want Nintendo to go back to focusing on games instead of adding 70 or 80 dollars cost to their systems to contain a gimmick that doesn't improve gameplay in any way.

Believe it or not, it is possible to sell a system these days with just a controller without a second screen, camera, wand, steering wheel, or gyro in it.
Every controller is going to have a gyro in it. Even the Ouya controller has a gyro.





What makes the Wii U a bad product? The system is fine. The OS updates are coming. Games are coming. The biggest issue it has, right now, is that the games aren't coming fast enough.
It's not a defective product, it just has no games that justify it's rather high price tag to more than a small handful of people.
 

GetemMa

Member
I predict another massive price cut ($225 WiiU basic/$275 deluxe) followed by another Ambassador program for us early adopters.

Iwata really needs to step down. I like Iwata as a person but he is simply doing everything either wrong or too slowly and he has been now for 5 years.

The WiiU hardware power, 3rd party support, online services, regularly providing good 1st party games for the WiiU: he has failed miserably on all counts. I don't know what other evidence they need. He doesn't have a grasp of the current market and he hasn't built any relationships with western studios, in fact it seems he has driven them further away.

WiiU should have been "Wii 2". Instead of the gamepad they should have put that money into making it have genuine next gen power (or approaching it) with a standard 10 button dual analog controller (like the WiiU Pro Controller) that also supported Wiimote+.

This is two terrible hardware launches in a row but the WiiU has the bigger problems than the 3DS. Japan won't save them and they have bigger competitors in home consoles.

They will probably give him another E3 where Nintendo will probably give another underwhelming presentation with a few scattered cheers for Smash 4 and Mario Galaxy 3 (or whatever its called) while they spend more than half their time on shit nobody wants like Wii Party U and Wii Fit U.
 
What does Sony even do with the Vita at this point? Wait for Killzone before they drop the price? I've never seen a platform with so little buzz.

Honestly? I think Sony's ongoing strategy of moneyhatting indie devs to make PS3 + Vita ports is the best approach, and try to get people in via having a large backlog of games through Cross Buy. Might be worthwhile promoting PlayStation+ online in a similar manner to what's going on in Europe (a few gaming site takeovers, getting YouTube & Twitch ads highlighting the latest and greatest games currently on the service. Yes, that means Virtue's Last Reward is getting advertised in Europe), and get people to grow Vita backlogs that way. Sure, it won't stop the decline, but at this stage I don't think anything will. Just keep things ticking over, pander to the people who bought the bloody thing and try to get as much PSN Store commision out of it as possible.
 

Miles X

Member
LTD (using the prediction threads estimates for Jan/Feb and what we've deducted here)

Wii: 40.99m
360: 38.82m
PS3: 24.07m
PS2: 46.2m

The rate at which 360 is outselling Wii grew this Q yoy yet again, 515k in 12, 554k this year.

Should outsell Wii by Dec.
 

Y2Kev

TLG Fan Caretaker Est. 2009
I think the Wii U's upper bound is probably gamecube territory in the US.

Vita's is probably Lady Chatterly's Lover sales from the Young Adult Section at a library
 

RedSwirl

Junior Member
When it comes to the poor Wii U and Vita sales, do most people here thing it's more due to the marketing or the hardware not being appropriate for the market (high price of Vita, Wii U gamepad, etc.)?

For the Vita, the latter. For the Wii U, marketing. For both, lack of software.

I still believe that if a system has enough good games, nobody's gonna give too much of a shit how powerful it is.
 

Massa

Member
Even with four major releases the industry is still down yoy? This is pretty bad. Though I suppose a retail tracker will only go down over the next few years.
 
What makes the Wii U a bad product? The system is fine. The OS updates are coming. Games are coming. The biggest issue it has, right now, is that the games aren't coming fast enough.

So it has a bad OS and no games, by your own admission, and you are asking why it's a bad product? So people should spend $350 on the promise of a better OS and more games?
 

jvm

Gamasutra.
Just because redundancy is fun.

Xbox 360 = 148.9°
PS3 = 119.8°
Wii = 52.3°
Wii U = 39°

That works out to:
Xbox 360 = 261K
PS3 = 210K
Wii = 92K
Wii U = 68K

Done with ImageJ angle measurement tool.

If people care for a second opinion, I can do same for handheld chart.
 
For the Vita, the latter. For the Wii U, marketing. For both, lack of software.

I still believe that if a system has enough good games, nobody's gonna give too much of a shit how powerful it is.
The problem is finding the minimum level of power required to get said games in the first place. I guess it's not a problem if you think that Nintendo and indies can make a console sell 75 million units... or even 50 million.
 

RedSwirl

Junior Member
So it has a bad OS and no games, by your own admission, and you are asking why it's a bad product? So people should spend $350 on the promise of a better OS and more games?

He probably thought you meant the hardware itself, or the concept of the controller, which is what a lot of people in this thread have suggested. I still think those things are secondary to a system's hardware library.
 
So outside of a price cut (and even then...) the WiiU's next opportunity to sell more than 100k units in a month would be... October?

Holy shit! A brand new console scrapping the bottom of the barrel for that long would be completely unpresidented :/
 

BlackJace

Member
Just because redundancy is fun.

Xbox 360 = 148.9°
PS3 = 119.8°
Wii = 52.3°
Wii U = 39°

That works out to:
Xbox 360 = 261K
PS3 = 210K
Wii = 92K
Wii U = 68K

Done with ImageJ angle measurement tool.

Yea let's go with this.

Goddaaaamn you have some work to do, Ninty.
 

Metallix87

Member
So it has a bad OS and no games, by your own admission, and you are asking why it's a bad product? So people should spend $350 on the promise of a better OS and more games?

Better OS is coming next week, so that's a non-issue at this point.

The games thing is subjective. I still think that the system has a pretty good library so far, but the drought is hitting hard now.

The price is the main issue here. Why should people pay $350 for the Wii U? The system isn't a bad product, but it's perceived value may definitely be lower than it's retail value, and that's tied to the software releases and Nintendo's lack of advertisement.
 
Best thing about Wii U is MiiVerse, brilliant sense of community from what I have experienced. If the system picks up I can see it thriving especially with the smartphone app
 

RedSwirl

Junior Member
The problem is finding the minimum level of power required to get said games in the first place. I guess it's not a problem if you think that Nintendo and indies can make a console sell 75 million units... or even 50 million.

But that only matters directly to developers. Most consumers don't compare game consoles like they're comparing washing machines.
 

Metallix87

Member
He probably thought you meant the hardware itself, or the concept of the controller, which is what a lot of people in this thread have suggested. I still think those things are secondary to a system's hardware library.

That's exactly what I had assumed he meant, and a lot of the posts in here seem to support that assumption.

I think the hardware is fine. The controller is fine. The problems are the software release schedule (and the delays of key titles), the lack of advertisement, and potentially the price of the system.
 
Also, let it be said that 7.2k/week in America is still Elvis territory. Basically, if you're doing sub-10k in a week, it's time to book the funeral in my book.
 
Nintendo completely wasted their year head start. Even Sega, in all their fucked up-ness, coming off the 32X/Saturn debacle, nailed the head start with Dreamcast. Xbox 360 also used a year head start to build a great foundation. Wii U is pretty much dead. It may not even hit Gamecube numbers and the third party support and game droughts will get worse and worse.
 
LTD (using the prediction threads estimates for Jan/Feb and what we've deducted here)

Wii: 40.99m
360: 38.82m
PS3: 24.07m
PS2: 46.2m

The rate at which 360 is outselling Wii grew this Q yoy yet again, 515k in 12, 554k this year.

Should outsell Wii by Dec.
At that rate it seems likely. That rate wont be possible though with ps4 and 360s successor coming out though. It might pull ot off in march 14 though.
 
Iwata's replacement is gonna sweep the WiiU under the rug so fast.

Can't do it so fast. They have completed games ready for Wii U that are coming in Summer after being strategically delayed to try relaunching it at E3 rather than try now. If they cancel the Wii U too quickly, its not like the drought of first-party releases will stop suddenly to a heavenly chorus.

It would be a major cash sink to cancel a system <1 year in and would kill Nintendo's presence in retail and in mindshare even moreso than now.

And Iwata will not go this year unless they have been training a successor in the background. The company might even make a profit this year if the yen and 3DS offset things. It's this upcoming FY that shit has to go down and hard.
 
But that only matters directly to developers. Most consumers don't compare game consoles like they're comparing washing machines.
Wait... how are consumers supposed to care about the thing if it can't get games? What matters to developers matters to consumers. You'd think the Wii dying a death would make that obvious.
 
It's still a poor comparison, then, since Wii U is a new system, it's still at least a bit more powerful than 360 / PS3, and it's using a pricey new controller that offers up new gameplay possibilities.
But there is no evidence to support this. New Super Mario bros. U is using Wii assets, and Pikmin 3 started out as a Wii game. The Wii U's biggest problem is that it hasn't differentiated itself from the competition yet, and because of how gimped the hardware is, it probably never will. The tablet controller is too convoluted for the casuals to use.
 

javac

Member
Best thing about Wii U is MiiVerse, brilliant sense of community from what I have experienced. If the system picks up I can see it thriving especially with the smartphone app

I also like how Iwata uses it in his Directs to show the fans support etc and uses it as an indication of what the fans want like 60htz in PAL Land, Earthbound etc.

Maybe it doesn't actually make a difference, but at least it feels like it makes a difference.
 

Schnozberry

Member
Wii U needs a Fall Price Drop to go along with its game releases. The faster Nintendo gets it down to $249, the better. It needs to be at a mass market price while the other consoles hover around $400-500.

Also, games. E3 needs to be a thunder clap from the mountains tops in terms of killer software from Nintendo on Wii U.
 
Top Bottom