Melchiah
Member
It is too early to say but a year wait and releasing in the Holiday season does not help its chances.
Timed exclusives rarily sell good a year later on another platform, see Bioshock and Mass Effect 2.
It is too early to say but a year wait and releasing in the Holiday season does not help its chances.
They can barely do $299 right now, so I really doubt it
Aesthetics matter more than you think.
Discount PC sales didn't please SE the first time around.
If one of SE goals was to have a higher ASP (which i would think so ) .
This not looking good for them .
I can't wait to see the slide(s) describing what they think of this from the next investor meeting.
Valid points, especially the last one that some fans will remember this for a long time and hold it against SE. We'll never know how it would have fared without this deal but it's an interesting discussion.
My main point is that we can't assume TR would have done well with a simultaneous release if they stuck with this same release window. Personally, I think that November release window was suicide. If they would have released in either June/July or January '16 they would be much better off. In that scenario, a simultaneous release would be best. But in that brutal November release window, I think Square actually benefited from this deal because MS helps bail out the sinking ship and they have more guaranteed money.
Wanna bet?
Just kidding: in all seriousness why do you say they "can barely do $299 right now". Just curious
$349 was a limited time only originallyBecause the $299 is happening for a limited time only, and it seems more like a counter for PS4 temporary price cut. This makes me think the decision to go $299 is hurting MS financially but they had to do it to compete.
So Fallout 4 did more on XBO? I sure didn't expect that.
I think most people will be unwilling to pay full price for a delayed game when all the new stuff is out next year. Personally, I will be waiting for $20-30.
$349 was a limited time only originally
For 9 weeks though, that's far from limited. They could have done the same with $299 offers but they didn't, which means this new $50 price cut hurt more than the last time.
BTW please note my first post on this subject specifically mentioned a factor will be what mft costs will be 6-9 months from now
Even if we presume that 299$ now is covering the costs - do you really expect them to go down a full 100$ more in 9 months?
At the moment, MS is stating something now, and the opposite the next day.
Last thing I heard, and many here echoed, is that they want to be profitable.
What most hurt the game and the entire deal was Microsoft's attempt to hide the true nature of the deal.The Tomb Raider deal was really weird in general because literally the first thing on everyone's mind was "that shit aren't staying exclusive so just tell us when its coming to PS4 and PC?".
Like why even bother to do it. At most it'll push some people really, really ready to buy an Xbox One in 2015 but it wouldn't convince anyone else to do an impulse buy.
Read all my posts on the subject
Hell just read the snippet you quoted
Bundle:
4 III ~ 251
U Splatoon ~ 140
1 FO4 ~ 158
All NDP_Mulcair info we got:
NPD Nov 2014
Advanced Warfare - 4.269M
Advanced Warfare bundled copies included - 4.66M
NPD Nov 2015
Blops3 - 4.607M
Blops3 bundled copies included - 4.89M
[that means 283K PS4 bundles sold]
NPD Nov 2015
Fallout 4 bundled copies included - 2.54M
[probably stronger digital sales]
NPD Nov 2011
Skyrim bundled copies included - 2.833M
NPD Nov 2015
Star Wars: Battlefront - 1.725M
Star Wars: Battlefront bundled copies included - 2.1M
[that means 375K Battlefront bundles sold in Nov]
So, using all of his info we get:
375K Battlefront bundles sold in Nov
283K Blops3 bundles sold in Nov
1539M PS4s sold in Nov
1539-375-283 = [up to] 881K Uncharted Collection bundles sold in Nov
If I answer it does not automatically mean I call you out or disagree.
As far as I can see you said it depends on their strategy. Sure.
Also you said it depends on if they manage to lower their costs so much. Yes, I completely agree.
I only doubt that they can as 100$ is a lot. So we are on the same side, you are just saying "it might be possible" and I am saying "highly unlikely".
Maybe they will lower the price and eat the costs, but that would be against the strategy they announced recently, being profitable.
If there is something else I missed I am sorry. I think I get a flu...
Sign.That said the reason why I'm saying it's possible is because despite them saying one thing ("we aren't trying to compete against Sony") their action for their pricing this month in response to Sony screams another; that they damn well are still trying to at least match or beat Sony in sales in the US.
So, Blops bundle was 251K and not 283K like numbers from NDP_Mulcair pointed? Close enough.
So, Blops bundle was 251K and not 283K like numbers from NDP_Mulcair pointed? Close enough.
I said "as for software."
"As for software" is referring to a comparison I made between the barebones standalone software sales on The NPD Group's data feeds with the combined total of everything including bundles.
No extraordinary curve if that's what you're asking.
No game you listed above was in the top 10 wii u this month, so all were below 34k
Smash and Kart are still in the top 10 though, around 45 and 35 respectively.
Sign.
I learned to take all MS statements with a huge rock of salt, too. This tale of profitability was entertaining but keeping the price high for a month or two, just to slash it for the two months where half of the sales for the year are made is sweet nonsense.
Also I would like to see who will bring the price further down first. I can imagine that Sony wants to push VR and for that make it affordable (if they are not dumb).
If the headset is 250 to 300 they could announce a bundle for 450 to 500, having the price of the console included psychologically at 200 to 250. And that would put MS further under pressure.
Let's put this under fan fiction so far, but 299$ have been fan fiction 3 months ago, too.
It's ok to change business strategies, in fact it's vital to assess, reassess and adjust. But I just hope they aren't wandering around aimlessly in the desert.
Spencer has to show that the division is profitable and can sell good numbers.
Problem is that both at the same time not seems to be possible.
They can barely do $299 right now, so I really doubt it.
Do we have any numbers how much a die shrink saves MS and Sony?
i wonder what incentives they'll have by then, tho? Like, maybe, do some PS4-exclusive DLC? There has to be something! LOL
Demo of FFVIIR with every copy. It's the only chance.
Do we still not have 3DS figures? Need them to do the prediction calculations.
Are those not included in the NPD reports?
Last month we also did not get them at the beginning.
I wonder why.
Are those not included in the NPD reports?
Last month we also did not get them at the beginning.
I wonder why.
For Nintendo squids.
Predictions:
NFS < 700K (390k)
Halo < 550K
AC < 400K
JD < 350K
SMM < 200K (140k)
11 & 12 -> Minecraft, GTA
Splatoon > 250K with bundles(245k)
4890-4607=283
4607+251=4858
!=
I want the game to fail miserably. I'll be doing my part by getting it used from GS or ebay.i think peeps writing off the PS4 release of RotTR are speaking too soon. Releasing after U4 + it being well-reviewed will help the remastered (LOL) definitive edition sell well on PS4.
I think you're underestimating how uninteresting a year-old game is in the fall release window.i think peeps writing off the PS4 release of RotTR are speaking too soon. Releasing after U4 + it being well-reviewed will help the remastered (LOL) definitive edition sell well on PS4.
Xbone version of Fallout 4 with bundles is ahead of PS4 version by a 10k-15k difference. COD BO3 standalon sold better on Xbone, but with bundles PS4 is ahead :
XB1 42% of 4.6m = 1.932.000
PS4 41% of 4.6m = 1.886.000
PS4 bundle: 251k
Which thanks to the 1 year delay (instead of 3/ 6 months) would now release again during a crowded Holiday, now with a possible Goty edition of UC4, on top of all the new titles which may include one with a red headed female hunting robo dinos with a bow.I think you're underestimating how uninteresting a year-old game is in the fall release window.
I think you're drastically underestimating just how badly public perception was effected by the exclussivity deal, and how much the massive fan backlash would have contributed to that soured image.
The deal has given almost nothing but bad press since day one, every single discussion about the game once it was made exclussive was derailed, no longer about whether the game was good or not or why anyone should be excited, but about how bad of an idea the deal was, how there was no point in buying it when you could wait for it to come out elsewhere, how badly it was going to crash and burn and how much of a kick in the teeth it was for the overwhelming majority of it's fanbase.
You can't have that constantly negative narrative surrounding the title and not expect it to harm sales, especially from the group who usually work as free publicity, the established fans.
Hell, think about how many other titles have benefited from positive word of mouth, how many sequels have gone on to increase sales over their predecessors because of the hype built up around it from people that loved the first game.
MS and SE/CD poisoned the well with this game the moment they signed that deal. It's the reason I and so many people accurately foresaw this disaster the moment it was announced, well before any other factor like Fallout 4 or the Uncharted 4 delay reared their heads.
Without the deal, all we'd have had would have been months of excited fans of the first game bugging it up and getting everybody excited.
That hype train wouldn't have just got the PC/PS fans on board, but would have boosted the Xbox sales too.
I mean there's a reason everyone expects the sequels of popular, critically well received titles to see a sales increase. People sell these games to other people. Take that away, as happened here, and this sales collapse is the result.
Sony won't make the same mistake they did last year.Another COD bundle incoming
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=189159881&postcount=453
Another COD bundle incoming
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=189159881&postcount=453
I believe Microsoft will do the same move with Halo 5, a new bundle with the standard 500GB console in early 2016.