Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 reviews and benchmarks

I've never spent more than 400€ on a GPU in my entire live, but unlike you seem to I don't begrudge those who do.

Do you plan to sit out this generation?
I don't think you will be able to get a new 1070 for less than 400€, and 1060 (which might go for <400€) isn't shaping like much of an upgrade from 970...
 
Do you plan to sit out this generation?
I don't think you will be able to get a new 1070 for less than 400€, and 1060 (which might go for <400€) isn't shaping like much of an upgrade from 970...
No, I plan to spend more. Having spent a significant amount of money on VR it seems counter-productive to hold back on the hardware driving it.
 
I usually buy high end GPU´s, so of course im concerned, from paying 500+€ 5 years ago to 800€ leaves a bad taste in my mouth, i know im not obliged to pay but if i want the best available that´s the current price i have to pay so i can only hope that AMD rises from the grave in order to have a price battle again. Just a recent exemple was the 290x launch, before that the 780 was almost 200€ higher, when 290x was released the 780 falled back to 500€ and we got a new high end gpu, the 780ti.

Everybody wins if we have at least two competitors on the market. Just my opinion.

Are you ignoring currency market in your comparison ? One Euro was worth 1,30 dollars few years ago , now we are barely in 1,1 territory
 
Are you ignoring currency market in your comparison ? One Euro was worth 1,30 dollars few years ago , now we are barely in 1,1 territory

That´s not what usually happens unfortunably when it comes to computer parts, Us$ prices normally translate to 1:1 euro prices even if the exchange rate varies. Same for consoles and games.

Example: 399$ PS4 = 399&#8364; PS4
 
That´s not what usually happens unfortunably when it comes to computer parts, Us$ prices normally translate to 1:1 euro prices even if the exchange rate varies. Same for consoles and games.

Example: 399$ PS4 = 399€ PS4

That was only true for earlier years where exchange rate covered VAT tax.

Consoles are bad example because they are priced to hit certain price point for marketing reasons.
 
That´s not what usually happens unfortunably when it comes to computer parts,
Not really. E.g. I bought a 5820k in September 2014 -- it never got any adjustment to its suggested USD retail price and $ prices for it were pretty stable. On the other hand, this is what it looks like in Europe:
5820k_pricesjkar4.png


That's an almost 25% price increase after launch for the same piece of hardware, coinciding in time with rapid devaluation of EUR compared to USD.
 
That was only true for earlier years where exchange rate covered VAT tax.

Consoles are bad example because they are priced to hit certain price point for marketing reasons.

Let´s take € out of equation, just focusing on $, 699$ for a reference card when previous generation card of the same segment was 599$ is a huge step up all thing considered, even nvidia states that 1080 is on the same segment that 980 was when lauched (even going by the marketing slides from nvidia).

I hope (but doubt) that we will see superior custom cards from partners starting 599$ without an equivalent AMD card out on the market raising this segment of GPUs 100$ more.
 
That´s not what usually happens unfortunably when it comes to computer parts, Us$ prices normally translate to 1:1 euro prices even if the exchange rate varies. Same for consoles and games.

Example: 399$ PS4 = 399€ PS4

Game prices around here have gone up recently so what you're saying isn't true. New games are €65 vs $60 in the USA.
 
Not really. E.g. I bought a 5820k in September 2014 -- it never got any adjustment to its suggested USD retail price and $ prices for it were pretty stable. On the other hand, this is what it looks like in Europe:
5820k_pricesjkar4.png


That's an almost 25% price increase after launch for the same piece of hardware, coinciding in time with rapid devaluation of EUR compared to USD.

OT: I can´t believe i have bought my 5820K almost two years ago (bought it at launch as well)

yes there was a big spike when euro lost value to US dollar but then it was slowly adjusted to almost similar levels of prices (EDIT: well not similar but on the middle of both max and min).

As i said in my previous post, just focusing on US currency we have an 100$ higher price for the same segment. That´s not good value in my book.
 
Just a recent exemple was the 290x launch, before that the 780 was almost 200&#8364; higher, when 290x was released the 780 falled back to 500&#8364; and we got a new high end gpu, the 780ti.

...and everybody kept buying NVidia.

We're getting EXACTLY what we deserve right now.
 
...and everybody kept buying NVidia.

We're getting EXACTLY what we deserve right now.

Uhhhhh... AMD made squillions during that generation because of the Bitcoin mining craze. You couldn't buy an AMD card for RRP because speculators, scalpers, and miners drove up the cost to insane levels. The 290X hit $900 at some point.

Then Nvidia came out with Maxwell, AMD shrugged and rereleased GCN again. Except this time the Bitcoin craze was over.
 
Are you dipping on the 1080 Durante? Or are you waiting it out for the 1080TI? I am going to dip on the 1080 but waiting for third party, I really want to stick with MSI and am excited to see what they will do with their cooler this time around.
If there is a really good third party 1080 with cooling that can generally hold 2GHz+ with good noise and thermal characteristics, and it's not insanely priced (that is, cheaper than the founder editions are currently going for), then I'll probably bite.

I'm certainly waiting for 1070 reviews though, but it seems like it might be too far off performance-wise (same for Polaris).
 
a Trump presidency would definitely lead to a lower dollar.
Lets hope for the best

Inflation isn't a bad thing. The USD is facing it right now, but the policies of the Federal Reserve are doing their best to hide it.

That's why wages haven't gone up in the past decade, but the cost of everything except consumer electronics have increased.

Having inflation will increase prices, but it will also increase wages which will allow people to pay off debt. People's 401Ks and IRAs will go up as the stock market inflates. The only people losing would be the ones just holding on to cash. The biggest losers would be corporations who are just holding extremely large stock piles of cash like Apple and Google.
 
14/16nm FF seems to be the reverse, clocking pretty well.

It isn't that the overclockability shrinks, but the relationship with clocks and efficiency. Finfet processes have a much more defined knee where there is an optimum ratio between efficiency and clockspeed. That knee is at a much higher frequency, but it gives less wiggle room.
 
No, I plan to spend more. Having spent a significant amount of money on VR it seems counter-productive to hold back on the hardware driving it.

I'm in the same boat. Having recently bought a 4K display, I need something that can actually allow me to play at that resolution without dropping many graphics settings.
 
Gtx 780 does not belong in that list

it's big kepler, 560mm² die, it's a cut down titan.

gtx 1080 is not a cut down pascal 'titan' (gp100) , it's the small die (gp104), like the 770 was and the 680, and the gtx 980 and 970, and the gtx 560-560ti before that.

I'm sure noone will read this and just argue that because big die kepler had a big die price that small die pascal should also cost 650 dollars...

Quoting this because i agree with this man.

It all started with the gtx680, just because Nvidia could. In another timeline where AMD 7970 drivers were matured from the start, the gtx680 would probably be sold as a gtx660ti or gtx670.

Same thing is happening with 1080, priced as a >Ti card from the start, and Nvidia sneaking in the FE tax, when will Nvidia price gouging ends?

A $599 1080 just aint happening unless AMD release Vega this year. Even so, a $599 small die gp104 is very bad gpu inflation, just because Nvidia can...

Things like VR and 4K graphics will take ages with these kind of pricing.
 
Yeah, that's how I feel on the whole situation. If I can get a 1080 third party with a decent cooler that will hold 2GHz + without sounding like a jet engine and between £500-550 I will bite.

I think the 1070 will perform great for the budget but I doubt it will get close the numbers the 1080 is doing, I also agree with you on Polaris, I just don't have a good feeling about AMD.

if you have something like a 970, it should be good enough to last you 12 more months. Then you can see what happens to the 1080 custom cards, how the 1070 performs, how both overclock and compare, and importantly what happens when Nvidia releases the 1080ti - either that will be one worth saving up for, or the price will drop on the 1080 making it better value than it currently is. For now the 1080 (assuming custom coolers hover around FE pricing) is too close to 980ti pricing to make it good value for me.
 
Forgive me guys, I have a real dummy question.

Does the GT 1080 out of the box (pictured below) have sufficient cooling to just throw in my PC and go to town? I only ask because my current GPU (my first, the only once I've ever bought) has like three small fans on it.

131102_1.jpg


Is that all i need to be good to go?
 
Also I'm confused why people would have absolutely no interest in OC. It isn't complicated anymore, it is literally sliding a couple of sliders in MSI afterburner while checking things stay stable, then you can leave it alone. Seems a no-brainer to get an extra 10%+ out of your expensive GPU.

Because I prefer stability.

My 970 boosts to 1405MHz by itself, some games work fine @1457MHz, others crash.

1443MHz seemed fine, but really, a 3% boost clock isn't worth a few crashes to see if it is stable or not.
 
Forgive me guys, I have a real dummy question.

Does the GT 1080 out of the box (pictured below) have sufficient cooling to just throw in my PC and go to town? I only ask because my current GPU (my first, the only once I've ever bought) has like three small fans on it.

131102_1.jpg


Is that all i need to be good to go?

The reference blower is OK if you plan on running at stock speeds. If you want to OC, you'll be much better served waiting for an AIB (like the one you have now with the three fans).
 
I have a feeling it will be a least a month, so late June.

Pretty sure rumors were early June, about the time 1070 hits, or am I missing something?

Custom coolers being late June would be a fucking kick in the balls, getting lots of stuttering in any semi-demanding game on my Vive, I need a new card damn it.
 
The reference blower is OK if you plan on running at stock speeds. If you want to OC, you'll be much better served waiting for an AIB (like the one you have now with the three fans).

If I wasn't planning on overclocking, is there any other benefit to waiting (other than the price that may or may not be lower)? Will the third party cards be faster/overclocked out of the box? Or will any extra power be something I'd have to do on my own (which I don't know anything about, and probably won't do)
 
Pretty sure rumors were early June, about the time 1070 hits, or am I missing something?

Custom coolers being late June would be a fucking kick in the balls, getting lots of stuttering in any semi-demanding game on my Vive, I need a new card damn it.

If it is, then I might be able to wait a little longer and not jump on the FE.
 
If I wasn't planning on overclocking, is there any other benefit to waiting (other than the price that may or may not be lower)? Will the third party cards be faster/overclocked out of the box? Or will any extra power be something I'd have to do on my own (which I don't know anything about, and probably won't do)

That's pretty much a given.

And the reference card has trouble keeping its boost frequency so if you can wait, wait.
 
Yes, to bolded, probably are OCd slightly.

At best, you'll get OC'd, custom cooled GPU for cheaper. I'd recommend waiting for news at very least before deciding.

You don't need to do anything by yourself with non-ref GPU unless you want to apply even more overclock.

That's pretty much a given.

And the reference card has trouble keeping its boost frequency so if you can wait, wait.

Fair enough! I'm in no rush. Thanks for the info guys :)
 
You 'may not notice' but the decibel output of a reference 980 compared to, say, an EVGA SC ACX 2.0 cooler is huge, with the EVGA 980 cooler being much quieter and totally silent at idle because of idle fan-off mode.

The original post called it a jet engine sound. It's obviously not a jet engine sound if I can't hear it. I don't have hearing loss. Every other fan in the enclosure we chosen specifically to build a quiet PC. It's very, very quiet. I have a couple of archive drives in my Mac that are the only sound that I can hear from a few feet away. I have to practically stick my head inside the PC to hear the 980's.

I had a Geforce FX 5800 Ultra... I know what a jet engine sounds like. Calling the current reference fans jet engines is just hyperbole.

Again, overclocking is probably a different situation, so I'm just referring to stock use. I had dual MSI cards before this with the Twin Frozr fan setup and it was the same as far as I'm concerned.. also quiet.

Edit: For fun, I downloaded EVGA's utility and cranked the fans to 100%. Yup, lots of air moving noise, but there's no whine or anything. It's bothersome though, but not anything I've ever heard during use.
 
The post I replied to was comparing to prices of similar cards of previous gens.

So by your reasoning that logic is invalid as well
28nm was cutting edge as too when the 680 released, it's apples to apples.

Which is why we got only a 300mm² die with the 680, and as yields improved we got a 400mm² die with the 980. Guess what is going to happen on 16nm? pascal launch is a carbon copy of the 28nm kepler launch.
-launch with a 300mm² die for x80-x70 card
-have a big fp64 card for workstations/servers on the new node

The 28 nm template will be upheld :
next will be titan based on the workstation card and an entry level chip for the x50-x60 cards
Then there'll be another ti card based on gp100

Then for their next architecture (if it's still on 16nm) we'll get a slightly bigger die for the x80 again (like maxwell gm204 @398mm²) and probably another pure fp32 card as there is no point for nvidia to design another workstation card on the same node.

And if you're really going to argue that each time a new process comes out it 'might be more expensive' then you're just suggesting to rationalize any price as being fair. How long are you going to keep that up? We're already completely off the deep end here... Tell anyone in 2011 you want them to pay 800 euros for a 560ti spec card and they'd laugh in your face, because it is ridiculous.

edit: and a good hint that it isn't is the fact that they stopped making maxwell cards a while ago, which means it's cheaper for them to sell you 16nm gpus than to rebrand a 28nm one for the lower end.

The fact is that nvidia stopped releasing BoM information after the 5xx cards so we will never know if it's more expensive or how much. Pluto might be filled with potatoes, can't prove otherwise so let's start taking those potatoes into consideration.

What we are left with without Bom info is a performance/dollar proposition and whether it's increasing enough to justify buying a new card after X years.

In this case , with the 1080, the value proposition is not much better than the 980ti, which has been available for ages.

It's really obnoxious how the early adaptors on this forum go out of their way to rationalize their spending every time some new crap comes out. So much so that the rest of us can't have a normal discussion about it.

Gpu prices keep inflating rapidly every generation and it has to stop. You can rationalize paying 800 euros for the same card that would have cost 300 euros back in 2011, but I don't have to.

Good post. The way graphics card prices have increased massively in the last 8 years is shocking.

Lets be clear here - Nvidia are selling the successor to their reference 980 (released at $549.99) for $699.99. 'Founders' Nvidia have admitted, is just a new name for 'reference'. But worse, this time the cooler they are selling on their $700 reference card is even worse than usual.

A more rational review of the 1080: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=myDYnofz_JE
 
Because I prefer stability.

My 970 boosts to 1405MHz by itself, some games work fine @1457MHz, others crash.

1443MHz seemed fine, but really, a 3% boost clock isn't worth a few crashes to see if it is stable or not.

Yours is a factory overclock? That's still overclocked, just somebody doing it for you.
 
Ahhhhh. It just keeps getting murkier, looks like I'm going to drop my preorder. I just emailed three sellers on Craigslist in my area, trying to get a 980ti for roughly $450. I justified the cost of the 1080 for too long and now I'm jumping off the hype train. Tuck and roll.

Unless anyone really needs to have a new GPU now it is kinda silly not to wait for the good cards (which may be cheaper or at a similar price as the FE version, but run much cooler and overclock better).
 
No point in getting mad people are scooping up FE cards. It is their money, they can do what they want with it. Plus supply is limited at launch so it isn't like there are a ton of cards being sold. We will see how the FE holds two months from now.


I think the biggest takeaway here is the fact that paying $100 over MSRP used to mean getting hardware on the level of EVGA Classified or MSI Lightning: custom PCB, cooler capable of dissipating 400W+ of heat and robust power delivery.

Instead, this time around, we get a GPU that barely maintains its default boost clocks and is only capable of overclocking once the fans are cranked up to near 100% (which according to HardOCP is unbearably loud). So what exactly does this mean for the 1080's at MSRP? An even shittier cooler? Lower base/boost clocks?

I don't know why people are expecting the aftermarket boards with better coolers/components to be cheaper than the Founder Edition, but I'd love to be wrong.
Aren't the classified line still coming? It will make the founders edition cards look foolish once available. Unless evga get super greedy with price.

The 1080 classified and the Strix will be the cards I look at but if pricing is too greedy I'll skip this generation. I'm bracing for 750 but could be more.

I fear what the 1080 TI will be sold for. Creeping back up towards 1000. TI might be the new Titan in terms of price with the 1080 the new TI.
 
Unless anyone really needs to have a new GPU now it is kinda silly not to wait for the good cards (which may be cheaper or at a similar price as the FE version, but run much cooler and overclock better).

Which is exactly the thing, time is a pretty crucial thing or I would wait. It's a unique circumstance, but I have a super light workload over the summer (no projects at an engineering firm until roughly September), after that I'll likely be working 60 hour weeks and travelling for the following 6 months to a year. So...the premium for a card right now is worth it to me (and it has to be Nvidia because I'm sitting on an RoG G-sync monitor).
 
Ahhhhh. It just keeps getting murkier, looks like I'm going to drop my preorder. I just emailed three sellers on Craigslist in my area, trying to get a 980ti for roughly $450. I justified the cost of the 1080 for too long and now I'm jumping off the hype train. Tuck and roll.

Why don't you just get a 1070
 
My excitement for the GTX 1080 AIB is kinda dropping now tbh, i really want to see a decent model from MSI but price is gona be an issue i feel. I may just hold onto my GTX970 a bit longer...
 
Good post. The way graphics card prices have increased massively in the last 8 years is shocking.

Lets be clear here - Nvidia are selling the successor to their reference 980 (released at $549.99) for $699.99. 'Founders' Nvidia have admitted, is just a new name for 'reference'. But worse, this time the cooler they are selling on their $700 reference card is even worse than usual.

A more rational review of the 1080: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=myDYnofz_JE

Posts like this are hilarious to me, because you literally don't know what you're talking about. I spent $550 on an ATI Radeon X1900XTX in 2006. You can do the math on how much that is in 2016 dollars with inflation. Spoiler for people incapable of math:
It's $652.75, which is not coincidentally close to how much a 1080 costs at launch. See, Nvidia can do math too!

The top shelf has always been brutal in pricing. That's how enthusiast tier works in PC gaming and how it always has. People are forgetting when AMD was pricing the Athlon 64 FX at $999 back in 2003 for God's sakes, like AMD doesn't price things high too when they have the performance advantage over their competitor. If anything Intel pricing the top HEDT Haswell-E CPU also at $999 today in 2016 means they are taking a loss on profit compared to AMD with the FX in 2003 because of inflation!

Of course you wouldn't know about historical video card prices since you have never spent more than $420 on a video card.
 
Ahhhhh. It just keeps getting murkier, looks like I'm going to drop my preorder. I just emailed three sellers on Craigslist in my area, trying to get a 980ti for roughly $450. I justified the cost of the 1080 for too long and now I'm jumping off the hype train. Tuck and roll.

it's a long shot but i'm selling mine for 450 if youre in the southern california area
 
My excitement for the GTX 1080 AIB is kinda dropping now tbh, i really want to see a decent model from MSI but price is gona be an issue i feel. I may just hold onto my GTX970 a bit longer...
Pretty much. The fact that there have merely been teases and basically no official reveals (no, the cheap ass GALAX blower card doesn't count lol) is slightly disheartening. Add in the uncertainity in regards to pricing and availability...
 
Yours is a factory overclock? That's still overclocked, just somebody doing it for you.

Yes and no.. It's still just buying a card, plugging it in, and running it at the intended spec. No downloading of utilities and fiddling with settings. I remember the time when I loved to squeeze every last ounce out of all my hardware, but that was a long time ago. It was a hobby within itself at the time, but now it would just be an annoyance.
 
Why don't you just get a 1070

The money I'd spend for the 980ti now is worth it just to have the card an extra month or more. Just got back and ended up getting an EVGA SC+ BP for $410, guy who sold it showed up in an absurd Lotus Exige S 260 and is planning on upgrading to SLI 1080's for his Vive. Now I can stop obsessing over such absurd things and just settle into some Doom/Witcher.
 
The money I'd spend for the 980ti now is worth it just to have the card an extra month or more. Just got back and ended up getting an EVGA SC+ BP for $410, guy who sold it showed up in an absurd Lotus Exige S 260 and is planning on upgrading to SLI 1080's for his Vive. Now I can stop obsessing over such absurd things and just settle into some Doom/Witcher.

That's a good deal. Probably price on par for performance of the 1070. Good job!
 
Top Bottom