The post I replied to was comparing to prices of similar cards of previous gens.
So by your reasoning that logic is invalid as well
28nm was cutting edge as too when the 680 released, it's apples to apples.
Which is why we got only a 300mm² die with the 680, and as yields improved we got a 400mm² die with the 980. Guess what is going to happen on 16nm? pascal launch is a carbon copy of the 28nm kepler launch.
-launch with a 300mm² die for x80-x70 card
-have a big fp64 card for workstations/servers on the new node
The 28 nm template will be upheld :
next will be titan based on the workstation card and an entry level chip for the x50-x60 cards
Then there'll be another ti card based on gp100
Then for their next architecture (if it's still on 16nm) we'll get a slightly bigger die for the x80 again (like maxwell gm204 @398mm²) and probably another pure fp32 card as there is no point for nvidia to design another workstation card on the same node.
And if you're really going to argue that each time a new process comes out it 'might be more expensive' then you're just suggesting to rationalize any price as being fair. How long are you going to keep that up? We're already completely off the deep end here... Tell anyone in 2011 you want them to pay 800 euros for a 560ti spec card and they'd laugh in your face, because it is ridiculous.
edit: and a good hint that it isn't is the fact that they stopped making maxwell cards a while ago, which means it's cheaper for them to sell you 16nm gpus than to rebrand a 28nm one for the lower end.
The fact is that nvidia stopped releasing BoM information after the 5xx cards so we will never know if it's more expensive or how much. Pluto might be filled with potatoes, can't prove otherwise so let's start taking those potatoes into consideration.
What we are left with without Bom info is a performance/dollar proposition and whether it's increasing enough to justify buying a new card after X years.
In this case , with the 1080, the value proposition is not much better than the 980ti, which has been available for ages.
It's really obnoxious how the early adaptors on this forum go out of their way to rationalize their spending every time some new crap comes out. So much so that the rest of us can't have a normal discussion about it.
Gpu prices keep inflating rapidly every generation and it has to stop. You can rationalize paying 800 euros for the same card that would have cost 300 euros back in 2011, but I don't have to.