Disappointed at the 1080. Can't do 4K VR. The end.
lol what :-D
guessing this is a joke
Disappointed at the 1080. Can't do 4K VR. The end.
I thought you meant a 1241 base clock. Mine is 1260 and boosts to 1500
lol what :-D
Also i am pretty sure it can, just depends on what level of detail you expect in the game and what game you are talking about.. also no VR headset supports 4Kguessing this is a joke
Yes.
Yes, the reference design can't even hold its advertised boost clocks due to thermal issues.
I always assume max settings, because if not then a lot of videocards can do 4K if you lower your video settings enough.
What determines your boost speed out of interest? My base clock is ~1250 and my memory 1952MHz but my boost is only 1338???
Thanks for the detailed and insightful answer.
each card has its own curve depending on the quality of the chip. 2 seperate 980tis can boost to a different level with an identical base clock for instance. from everything ive seen higher asic quality gpus boost higher off of a given base clock since they require less voltage
Perhaps that's why it's called boost. Intel CPUs don't maintain their turbo on all cores if you take a completely hands off approach.
In my experience they absolutely do (to varying levels), even on their crappy stock cooler.
PCB of a $700 "High End" GPU!
Wow that's a new low for Nvidia.
I got offered a couple week old EVGA 980ti FTW edition for $450. Do it??? I play at 1440p, and 4k. Will OC it further. Figure with SLI benchmarks doing well at 4k, I can add another down the line when prices drop further.....
I got offered a couple week old EVGA 980ti FTW edition for $450. Do it??? I play at 1440p, and 4k. Will OC it further. Figure with SLI benchmarks doing well at 4k, I can add another down the line when prices drop further.....
Depends on if you can wait for the non FE 1070 to come out(And assuming partner cards actually meet the non FE msrp)
each card has its own curve depending on the quality of the chip. 2 seperate 980tis can boost to a different level with an identical base clock for instance. from everything ive seen higher asic quality gpus boost higher off of a given base clock since they require less voltage
Perhaps that's why it's called boost. Intel CPUs don't maintain their turbo on all cores if you take a completely hands off approach.
Its also been shown that the FE does this and more with some pretty simple adjustments to fan speed and such. No modding or anything necessary. Of course this might depend on the particular game, since data is still somewhat limited.
Disappointed at the 1080. Can't do 4K VR. The end.
Actually checking the boost using Afterburner I am hitting near 1500 so I suspect GPU-Z just states your minimum boost speed or something.
Only the unlocked chips, think there are even timer limits on the normal chips.. And if we are talking reference design, then try using an Intel made motherboard.
1080 PCB is very stripped down regarding power delivery (to save costs). It is, after all, a reference card.
PCB analysis here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_2_iCCesxI
ooh god would people please stop.. just don't buy the reference card if you have issues with it
ooh god would people please stop.. just don't buy the reference card if you have issues with it
As someone who is interested in the 1080, I'm glad these discussions are being had in the thread. I like to be as informed as possible about my purchase and the technical specs/abilities of the card, beyond nVidia's marketing bullshit.
Why would anyone wanna stifle productive technical discussion?
Yea I'd much rather discuss the technical aspect, then whine about the marketing, etc.
If that was a jab at me, then I'm not complaining about their marketing, but rather making a point that NO company would be forthcoming about the shortcomings of a product before release. The onus is on the reviewers, experts, and buyers to scrutinize the card and figure out what it can and cannot do.
All you're gonna get from nVidia are pretty nondescript graphs and "THIS IS THE BEST GTX CARD YET", which while true, leaves a lot in the dark for those of us hoping to upgrade from cards like the 980 Ti.
Why would anyone wanna stifle productive technical discussion?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=myDYnofz_JE
Analysis by AdoredTV:
- 3% faster than GTX 980ti at 1430mhz
- 10% slower than Titan X at 1500 Mhz
- Much better than Fury X overclocked @ 1150 or so
- Founder's Edition throttles and wasn't benched in cases, rather open bench = different thermal environment
- Usual clock at stock power and temp target after 20 minutes of gaming is only the base clock...
If that was a jab at me, then I'm not complaining about their marketing, but rather making a point that NO company would be forthcoming about the shortcomings of a product before release. The onus is on the reviewers, experts, and buyers to scrutinize the card and figure out what it can and cannot do.
All you're gonna get from nVidia are pretty nondescript graphs and "THIS IS THE BEST GTX CARD YET", which while true, leaves a lot in the dark for those of us hoping to upgrade from cards like the 980 Ti.
There's nothing in the dark. Reference to reference is a good representation of what you'll see between OC vs OC as well. If you want an OC 1080 or is running an OC 980Ti the reference 1080 is obviously not for you. I'd argue that 1080 in general is a bad upgrade for 980Ti owners but hey it's not my money (I myself might jump to 1080 if only out of curiosity).
Arent there only reference Titan X's available?
People put aftermarket air cooling or more commonly water cool them.
EVGA sells a Titan X with a hybrid cooler.Arent there only reference Titan X's available?
980tis dropped a bit further today on Amazon. Some of them have a $30 rebate as well.
I'm thinking about a 1070. I'm currently on a 770 and I don't plan on moving beyond 1080p in the next 5 years so I suspect a 1070 should perform extremely well at least that long.
I'm definitely projecting here, but I'll offer up my opinion on the matter: can you possibly hold out until HBM2 cards are released? The folks that are dropping serious cash on these cards might be better served waiting 6-8 months, because HBM2 cards are going to be monstrous in terms of performance and allow for more compact designs.
That said, if you want something to last you for 5 years...why not the 1080?
We're preorders from nvidia supposed to go up today?
I'm thinking about a 1070. I'm currently on a 770 and I don't plan on moving beyond 1080p in the next 5 years so I suspect a 1070 should perform extremely well at least that long.
I don't know how I got it in my head that nvidia was selling them through their own website. Blech I need one of these asap.Apparently Newegg put them up already? I wasn't going to buy a reference card anyways.
A 1070 should kill 1080p for a long time. That said, even at 1080p there's supersampling and downsampling to consider.
holy cow, the CAD price increase is crazy. Is anyone from canada actually buying this? it's 910 bucks..
In other words, it's exactly what it should be based on the currency conversion?
I don't know how I got it in my head that nvidia was selling them through their own website. Blech I need one of these asap.
I swear someone here said they'd be selling them on nvidia.com today.... What a disaster of a "launch"
+1. I always find it hilarious when Canadians majorly overreact, as if they don't know what the exchange rate is.
![]()
Y'all need to simmer down.
I swear someone here said they'd be selling them on nvidia.com today.... What a disaster of a "launch"
I thought that was the 27th.
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1080 XTREME GAMING pictured
http://videocardz.com/60298/exclusive-gigabyte-geforce-gtx-1080-xtreme-gaming-pictured
EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 SC ACX 3.0 pictured?
http://videocardz.com/60297/evga-geforce-gtx-1080-sc-acx-3-0-pictured
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1080 XTREME GAMING pictured
http://videocardz.com/60298/exclusive-gigabyte-geforce-gtx-1080-xtreme-gaming-pictured
EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 SC ACX 3.0 pictured?
http://videocardz.com/60297/evga-geforce-gtx-1080-sc-acx-3-0-pictured