Lactose_Intolerant
Member
they need to find something that actually uses all the ram to show off the card.
Nvidia just pulled down this graph from their website:
![]()
No idea why... scared of people cancelling plans to pre-order?
The 1k price point stings, because for the same price you can get a 690 with better performance. For 2k sli 690 beats out titan.
I know I know, single card gpu benefits. Plus the memory and boost 2.0. But it just seems weird to me for the price to be exactly the same as 690.
Wait a minute, this is priced the same as the GTX 690 yet the GTX 690 is still faster? Am I missing something here?
Well I game at 1600p. For $945 I got a 680 SLI set up that pushes Metro 2033 past 60 fps. For more than that at 1k I can get 40 fps on Metro with Titan at my resolution. Hmmm.
While I get the whole consistent profile/performance (the micro stutter factor) and even the new boost 2.0 - the price doesn't make sense to me, given the performance.
Wait a minute, this is priced the same as the GTX 690 yet the GTX 690 is still faster? Am I missing something here?
single gpu vs dual gpu.
Microstutter, frame latency, SLI profiles, Noise, Heat, Fried eggs, something something something...
I'm not sure how you're getting 60fps in Metro maxed on a 680 SLI setup - Guru3D benches say differently. Do you have DoF turned off?
![]()
If we compare these numbers with Nvidia's graph the Titan is almost matching a 680 SLI setup here
Good points but I still think pricing this the same as the 690 is odd.
Right, I'm just not seeing why someone would opt for the single GPU aside from wanting to use HDMI.
Good points but I still think pricing this the same as the 690 is odd.
Many would say the advantages make up for the lost performance, as well as the potential for doing a Titan SLI setup down the road.
Microstutter, frame latency, SLI profiles, Noise, Heat, Fried eggs, something something something...
Nah, quad-SLI is horrible. I had a 2nd 690 for about a week - sold it. Practically a paperweight. You want the most performance per GPU - Titan is it. Value is up to you.
Nvidia just pulled down this graph from their website:
![]()
No idea why... scared of people cancelling plans to pre-order?
And then have all those 'problems' again having spent 2k... Quite ironic actually.
Yeah, fair enough point. But my issue still is, for $945 my 680 SLI has better performance than a Single Titan. The price is my issue.
I'm not sure how you're getting 60fps in Metro maxed on a 680 SLI setup - Guru3D benches say differently. Do you have DoF turned off?
![]()
If we compare these numbers with Nvidia's graph the Titan is almost matching a 680 SLI setup here
It's nice to have the option, however. This gives you options. Having an SLI setup that can barely outperform it gives you no (good) room for future growth.
you've already invested your money in a setup that you're apparently happen with. this isn't a product for you. It's for those of us who haven't upgraded to something that powerful already. we get to enjoy similar performance at half the power draw, with fewer disadvantages, and the option to expand later.
I don't see any reason why someone with a 680sli setup should even be here at this point. You're good to go, unless you're looking for a reason to sell the 2 cards you only recently bought...which is just silly.
My apologies, guess I need to stop looking at these charts as - 100% universal numbers, and actually look at the settings being used on them. That's beyond obvious, I know.
So, are you guys saying a single Titan out performs a 680 SLI?
Guys, titan is for 4k gaming and people with more money than common sense.
The fact that DP wasn't nerfed shows they are still making a very nice profit out of each one while making them the ideal poor man's GPGPU.
If you game at 1600p, their appeal is a bit more limited.
How the hell is it for 4k gaming when it struggles at 2560x1600 to maintain 60FPS in a newly released game? What a silly comment.
1000 huh
Meh. I'd rather get two 680 4GB with that. Or even a 690 but the vram in that thing hurts it.
It's nice to have the option, however. This gives you options. Having an SLI setup that can barely outperform it gives you no (good) room for future growth.
This argument makes no sense for several reasons:
- These cards are meant to be limited in their supply. The option for you to SLI a year or 2 down the line is blocked.
- By the time you look to upgrade again there will again be a better single card solution on the market (7xxx or 8xxx series).
- Will you have ANOTHER $1000 down the line to splash on one of these? Will you be able to justify it?
I say, just get the best there is for the money you are looking to spend that delivers the performance you need. And if that means going SLI and you are prepared for the potential pitfalls then so be it.
I've never seen a PC community that is as anti SLI/CF as this one. I don't understand where it comes from because there are many of us sitting here quietly with SLI/CF setups that aren't causing any problems.
This argument makes no sense for several reasons:
- These cards are meant to be limited in their supply. The option for you to SLI a year or 2 down the line is blocked.
- By the time you look to upgrade again there will again be a better single card solution on the market (7xxx or 8xxx series).
- Will you have ANOTHER $1000 down the line to splash on one of these? Will you be able to justify it?
I say, just get the best there is for the money you are looking to spend that delivers the performance you need. And if that means going SLI and you are prepared for the potential pitfalls then so be it.
I've never seen a PC community that is as anti SLI/CF as this one. I don't understand where it comes from because there are many of us sitting here quietly with SLI/CF setups that aren't causing any problems.
This argument makes no sense for several reasons:
- These cards are meant to be limited in their supply. The option for you to SLI a year or 2 down the line is blocked.
- By the time you look to upgrade again there will again be a better single card solution on the market (7xxx or 8xxx series).
- Will you have ANOTHER $1000 down the line to splash on one of these? Will you be able to justify it?
I say, just get the best there is for the money you are looking to spend that delivers the performance you need. And if that means going SLI and you are prepared for the potential pitfalls then so be it.
I've never seen a PC community that is as anti SLI/CF as this one. I don't understand where it comes from because there are many of us sitting here quietly with SLI/CF setups that aren't causing any problems.
It has been debunked that these are limited supply. They are exactly like 690, short first-run and then a constant production - Just a heads up![]()
How the hell is it for 4k gaming when it struggles at 2560x1600 to maintain 60FPS in a newly released game? What a silly comment.
There's no hardware even close to being '4k gaming' capable at this point.
Its a pretty common issue, just google your favorite top end GPU and the word microstutter and you will find tons of evidence on various forums.
My experience is personal, with the 6950 series, it was unbearable, I kept thinking there was something wrong with my setup and wasted so much time to try to fix it (vsync, d3d overdrive, disabling HT on my i7, frame capping with DxTory, etc etc).
As soon as I moved to a single GPU (7970), my woes where gone even though I supposedly lost like 20fps in every game.
It has been debunked that these are limited supply. They are exactly like 690, short first-run and then a constant production - Just a heads up![]()
Its a pretty common issue, just google your favorite top end GPU and the word microstutter and you will find tons of evidence on various forums.
My experience is personal, with the 6950 series, it was unbearable, I kept thinking there was something wrong with my setup and wasted so much time to try to fix it (vsync, d3d overdrive, disabling HT on my i7, frame capping with DxTory, etc etc).
As soon as I moved to a single GPU (7970), my woes where gone even though I supposedly lost like 20fps in every game.
So 2GB 680 SLI has 2GB of total vram, Titan has 6. That's my main issue right now. Adding a second 680 will probably perform similarly or better than Titan, but Vram could be a bottleneck going into next gen in a year+, thoughts?
So 2GB 680 SLI has 2GB of total vram, Titan has 6. That's my main issue right now. Adding a second 680 will probably perform similarly or better than Titan, but Vram could be a bottleneck going into next gen in a year+, thoughts?
There's your issue - AMD 6xxx was horrible in CF. I've had 580/680 in SLI and 7xxx in CF - leagues better.
My apologies, guess I need to stop looking at these charts as - 100% universal numbers, and actually look at the settings being used on them. That's beyond obvious, I know.
So, are you guys saying a single Titan out performs a 680 SLI?
There's your issue - AMD 6xxx was horrible in CF. I've had 580/680 in SLI and 7xxx in CF - leagues better.
Guru 3D is reporting a 30% increase with just the stock air cooler.30 FPS (Titan) vs 37 FPS (680SLI). OC'ing may be able to make up for the difference, though.
Guru 3D is reporting a 30% increase with just the stock air cooler.
And mkenyon, you know deep down inside ... You want one, you need one ...
Should have gone 4GB when you got your 680. The question you've got to ask yourself is why did you get a 2GB card if you feel that 2GB could bottleneck in a year or so?
How much would it cost you to swap your 2GB for a 4GB and then go SLI vs just getting a titan outright?
I know, that's why it's frustrating!And mkenyon, you know deep down inside ... You want one, you need one ...