• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

NVIDIA to release GeForce Titan

Man, if this really is $1000, then I'm out, unquestionably. Just gonna get a 680 Classified.

Only a couple more days until I know my fate!
 
Nvidia just pulled down this graph from their website:

1d6pix.png


No idea why... scared of people cancelling plans to pre-order?

#notgoodenough
 
The 1k price point stings, because for the same price you can get a 690 with better performance. For 2k sli 690 beats out titan.

I know I know, single card gpu benefits. Plus the memory and boost 2.0. But it just seems weird to me for the price to be exactly the same as 690.

Nah, quad-SLI is horrible. I had a 2nd 690 for about a week - sold it. Practically a paperweight. You want the most performance per GPU - Titan is it. Value is up to you.
 
Well I game at 1600p. For $945 I got a 680 SLI set up that pushes Metro 2033 past 60 fps. For more than that at 1k I can get 40 fps on Metro with Titan at my resolution. Hmmm.

While I get the whole consistent profile/performance (the micro stutter factor) and even the new boost 2.0 - the price doesn't make sense to me, given the performance.

I'm not sure how you're getting 60fps in Metro maxed on a 680 SLI setup - Guru3D benches say differently. Do you have DoF turned off?

Untitled-16.png


If we compare these numbers with Nvidia's graph the Titan is almost matching a 680 SLI setup here
 
I'm not sure how you're getting 60fps in Metro maxed on a 680 SLI setup - Guru3D benches say differently. Do you have DoF turned off?

Untitled-16.png


If we compare these numbers with Nvidia's graph the Titan is almost matching a 680 SLI setup here

He probably disabled the DoF and is using AAA instead of MSAA.
 
Right, I'm just not seeing why someone would opt for the single GPU aside from wanting to use HDMI.



Good points but I still think pricing this the same as the 690 is odd
.

I was actually being sarcastic!

I'm an SLI user and have none of those problems and can't see what all the fuss is about with this card when you take into account the price to be honest.

Many would say the advantages make up for the lost performance, as well as the potential for doing a Titan SLI setup down the road.

And then have all those 'problems' again having spent 2k... Quite ironic actually.
 
Microstutter, frame latency, SLI profiles, Noise, Heat, Fried eggs, something something something...

Since we are talking about the 690GTX you can throw noise and heat out the window. The card is very quiet and I've yet to see it hit 80c in anything but a benchmark. I've never actually tweaked the automatic fan profile either. With stock settings the card is only audible after hitting 75c or so. I have some pretty quiet case fans too.

Waiting for decent profiles does suck though. So does microstuttering that often can't be fixed unless you disable a GPU (I've only experience this in very few tittles and lucky for me I could still hold 60 FPS with one GPU).
 
Nah, quad-SLI is horrible. I had a 2nd 690 for about a week - sold it. Practically a paperweight. You want the most performance per GPU - Titan is it. Value is up to you.

Yeah, fair enough point. But my issue still is, for $945 my 680 SLI has better performance than a Single Titan. The price is my issue.
 
And then have all those 'problems' again having spent 2k... Quite ironic actually.

It's nice to have the option, however. This gives you options. Having an SLI setup that can barely outperform it gives you no (good) room for future growth.

Yeah, fair enough point. But my issue still is, for $945 my 680 SLI has better performance than a Single Titan. The price is my issue.

you've already invested your money in a setup that you're apparently happen with. this isn't a product for you. It's for those of us who haven't upgraded to something that powerful already. we get to enjoy similar performance at half the power draw, with fewer disadvantages, and the option to expand later.

I don't see any reason why someone with a 680sli setup should even be here at this point. You're good to go, unless you're looking for a reason to sell the 2 cards you only recently bought...which is just silly.
 
I'm not sure how you're getting 60fps in Metro maxed on a 680 SLI setup - Guru3D benches say differently. Do you have DoF turned off?

Untitled-16.png


If we compare these numbers with Nvidia's graph the Titan is almost matching a 680 SLI setup here

My apologies, guess I need to stop looking at these charts as - 100% universal numbers, and actually look at the settings being used on them. That's beyond obvious, I know.

So, are you guys saying a single Titan out performs a 680 SLI?
 
It's nice to have the option, however. This gives you options. Having an SLI setup that can barely outperform it gives you no (good) room for future growth.



you've already invested your money in a setup that you're apparently happen with. this isn't a product for you. It's for those of us who haven't upgraded to something that powerful already. we get to enjoy similar performance at half the power draw, with fewer disadvantages, and the option to expand later.

I don't see any reason why someone with a 680sli setup should even be here at this point. You're good to go, unless you're looking for a reason to sell the 2 cards you only recently bought...which is just silly.

True enough. I'll just butt out of this thread now. Nothing more to really say. I was actually considering getting one at $899. But $1,000 is just too much, given what I've already invested.
 
My apologies, guess I need to stop looking at these charts as - 100% universal numbers, and actually look at the settings being used on them. That's beyond obvious, I know.

So, are you guys saying a single Titan out performs a 680 SLI?

680 SLI out performs a 690 and a single Titan doesn't beat a 690.
 
Guys, titan is for 4k gaming and people with more money than common sense.

The fact that DP wasn't nerfed shows they are still making a very nice profit out of each one while making them the ideal poor man's GPGPU.

If you game at 1600p, their appeal is a bit more limited.
 
Guys, titan is for 4k gaming and people with more money than common sense.

The fact that DP wasn't nerfed shows they are still making a very nice profit out of each one while making them the ideal poor man's GPGPU.

If you game at 1600p, their appeal is a bit more limited.

How the hell is it for 4k gaming when it struggles at 2560x1600 to maintain 60FPS in a newly released game? What a silly comment.

There's no hardware even close to being '4k gaming' capable at this point.
 
Cant wait for more benchmarks, but what has been shown so far isnt really making me want to get the money together to buy it.

I was planning on starting to sell a lot of stuff that dont see so much use anymore to try to afford this thing, but im not going through all that effort just to have like 20-30% advantage over a 680.
 
It's nice to have the option, however. This gives you options. Having an SLI setup that can barely outperform it gives you no (good) room for future growth.

This argument makes no sense for several reasons:

- These cards are meant to be limited in their supply. The option for you to SLI a year or 2 down the line is blocked.

- By the time you look to upgrade again there will again be a better single card solution on the market (7xxx or 8xxx series).

- Will you have ANOTHER $1000 down the line to splash on one of these? Will you be able to justify it?

I say, just get the best there is for the money you are looking to spend that delivers the performance you need. And if that means going SLI and you are prepared for the potential pitfalls then so be it.

I've never seen a PC community that is as anti SLI/CF as this one. I don't understand where it comes from because there are many of us sitting here quietly with SLI/CF setups that aren't causing any problems.
 
This argument makes no sense for several reasons:

- These cards are meant to be limited in their supply. The option for you to SLI a year or 2 down the line is blocked.

- By the time you look to upgrade again there will again be a better single card solution on the market (7xxx or 8xxx series).

- Will you have ANOTHER $1000 down the line to splash on one of these? Will you be able to justify it?

I say, just get the best there is for the money you are looking to spend that delivers the performance you need. And if that means going SLI and you are prepared for the potential pitfalls then so be it.

I've never seen a PC community that is as anti SLI/CF as this one. I don't understand where it comes from because there are many of us sitting here quietly with SLI/CF setups that aren't causing any problems.

It has been debunked that these are limited supply. They are exactly like 690, short first-run and then a constant production - Just a heads up :)
 
This argument makes no sense for several reasons:

- These cards are meant to be limited in their supply. The option for you to SLI a year or 2 down the line is blocked.

- By the time you look to upgrade again there will again be a better single card solution on the market (7xxx or 8xxx series).

- Will you have ANOTHER $1000 down the line to splash on one of these? Will you be able to justify it?

I say, just get the best there is for the money you are looking to spend that delivers the performance you need. And if that means going SLI and you are prepared for the potential pitfalls then so be it.

I've never seen a PC community that is as anti SLI/CF as this one. I don't understand where it comes from because there are many of us sitting here quietly with SLI/CF setups that aren't causing any problems.

Nvidia actually said they're going to be in continuous production.
 
This argument makes no sense for several reasons:

- These cards are meant to be limited in their supply. The option for you to SLI a year or 2 down the line is blocked.

- By the time you look to upgrade again there will again be a better single card solution on the market (7xxx or 8xxx series).

- Will you have ANOTHER $1000 down the line to splash on one of these? Will you be able to justify it?

I say, just get the best there is for the money you are looking to spend that delivers the performance you need. And if that means going SLI and you are prepared for the potential pitfalls then so be it.

I've never seen a PC community that is as anti SLI/CF as this one. I don't understand where it comes from because there are many of us sitting here quietly with SLI/CF setups that aren't causing any problems.

Its a pretty common issue, just google your favorite top end GPU and the word microstutter and you will find tons of evidence on various forums.

My experience is personal, with the 6950 series, it was unbearable, I kept thinking there was something wrong with my setup and wasted so much time to try to fix it (vsync, d3d overdrive, disabling HT on my i7, frame capping with DxTory, etc etc).

As soon as I moved to a single GPU (7970), my woes where gone even though I supposedly lost like 20fps in every game.
 
Okay, $1000 for this card is madness.

I'm a tinkerer and enthusiast never with an eye towards $:performance. Part of the joy I get out of hardware is just playing with it, pushing it to its limits, benching, putting it under water, yada yada.

Asking $1000 for a high end card that would have been released any other generation at a reasonable price is a serious "Fuck you idiots, we know you'll pay for it" from NVIDIA. Not gonna do it.

unless it really does OC like a madman
 
How the hell is it for 4k gaming when it struggles at 2560x1600 to maintain 60FPS in a newly released game? What a silly comment.

There's no hardware even close to being '4k gaming' capable at this point.

See avatar.

Quake 3 at 4k yo!
 
Its a pretty common issue, just google your favorite top end GPU and the word microstutter and you will find tons of evidence on various forums.

My experience is personal, with the 6950 series, it was unbearable, I kept thinking there was something wrong with my setup and wasted so much time to try to fix it (vsync, d3d overdrive, disabling HT on my i7, frame capping with DxTory, etc etc).

As soon as I moved to a single GPU (7970), my woes where gone even though I supposedly lost like 20fps in every game.

There's your issue - AMD 6xxx was horrible in CF. I've had 580/680 in SLI and 7xxx in CF - leagues better.
 
It has been debunked that these are limited supply. They are exactly like 690, short first-run and then a constant production - Just a heads up :)

Ok fine, every other point still stands. When I see statements like:

"I have to buy this over SLI because that way I can avoid SLI problems but then I can also SLI in the future as there is an upgrade path"

It makes my head hurt. I look at that and I'm like "U mad".

Its a pretty common issue, just google your favorite top end GPU and the word microstutter and you will find tons of evidence on various forums.

My experience is personal, with the 6950 series, it was unbearable, I kept thinking there was something wrong with my setup and wasted so much time to try to fix it (vsync, d3d overdrive, disabling HT on my i7, frame capping with DxTory, etc etc).

As soon as I moved to a single GPU (7970), my woes where gone even though I supposedly lost like 20fps in every game.

Google Nvidia 6xx Series and microstutter... Theres not much out there. Its Nvidia's secret sauce.
 
So 2GB 680 SLI has 2GB of total vram, Titan has 6. That's my main issue right now. Adding a second 680 will probably perform similarly or better than Titan, but Vram could be a bottleneck going into next gen in a year+, thoughts?

edit: so after the first run warms up, these will be more widely available? Brick and mortar stores like Microcenter/Fry's? They carry 690s.
 
So 2GB 680 SLI has 2GB of total vram, Titan has 6. That's my main issue right now. Adding a second 680 will probably perform similarly or better than Titan, but Vram could be a bottleneck going into next gen in a year+, thoughts?

You could always go 4GB 680 SLI.
 
So 2GB 680 SLI has 2GB of total vram, Titan has 6. That's my main issue right now. Adding a second 680 will probably perform similarly or better than Titan, but Vram could be a bottleneck going into next gen in a year+, thoughts?

Should have gone 4GB when you got your 680. The question you've got to ask yourself is why did you get a 2GB card if you feel that 2GB could bottleneck in a year or so?

How much would it cost you to swap your 2GB for a 4GB and then go SLI vs just getting a titan outright?
 
There's your issue - AMD 6xxx was horrible in CF. I've had 580/680 in SLI and 7xxx in CF - leagues better.

Yep, I went from 4870x2 to the 5970 to the 690 and it is leagues better. I've heard AMD have improved their drivers dramatically in recent months but at the time I felt multi-GPU was a headache more than anything. Now, if the Titan retails for £830+ I just don't see how it could be recommended over the 690 which is comparatively £750. The negatives of SLI just aren't worth the extra expense just for the purpose of having a single GPU. If you feel you really need that extra VRAM though then I can see the benefits.

Of course, if the actual non-Nvidia benchmarks show that the Titan is indeed a beast then that would change things but going by the earlier Nvidia graph that is how I would feel.
 
My apologies, guess I need to stop looking at these charts as - 100% universal numbers, and actually look at the settings being used on them. That's beyond obvious, I know.

So, are you guys saying a single Titan out performs a 680 SLI?

30 FPS (Titan) vs 37 FPS (680SLI). OC'ing may be able to make up for the difference, though.
 
There's your issue - AMD 6xxx was horrible in CF. I've had 580/680 in SLI and 7xxx in CF - leagues better.

Wish people could just experience the leaps for SLI for each generation, they are pretty significant because there's a lot of misconceptions being spread around based on previous generations.
 
Should have gone 4GB when you got your 680. The question you've got to ask yourself is why did you get a 2GB card if you feel that 2GB could bottleneck in a year or so?

How much would it cost you to swap your 2GB for a 4GB and then go SLI vs just getting a titan outright?

I got the 680 last week, so I could exchange but the retailer only has reference design Zotac 4GB cards. I'm new to PC gaming and only at 1080P for the time being so it wasn't a huge concern. I'll probably sell it to move to a Titan if I decide to upgrade between Titan and 7xx series, which isn't a definite yet.
 
Top Bottom