• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

NVIDIA to release GeForce Titan

No Crysis 3 benchmarks yet?

There are some:

nvidia-geforce-gtx-titan-1920-1080-performance-650px.png


nvidia-geforce-gtx-titan-2560-1600-performance-650px.png
 
Feels like I just bought a Barbie doll. Now I need all the accessories; Fancy SLI bridge, EVGA Backlate, High airflow bracket etc
 
In that case, I'm definitely gonna wait and see on Mr. Titan. Lightning Edition? OC's? Direct's? oh snap.

aren't those non-reference EVGAs just reference boards with another bios (higher MHz) and a backplate ?

every site is talking about how Nvidia won't allow partners to come up with custom boards ...

Feels like I just bought a Barbie doll. Now I need all the accessories; Fancy SLI bridge, EVGA Backlate, High airflow bracket etc

COME ON BARBIE LETS GO PARTY
fucking danes lol
 
In that case, I'm definitely gonna wait and see on Mr. Titan. Lightning Edition? OC's? Direct's? oh snap.

Meh. NVIDIA neutered all the "fun" stuff for GPUs last gen (MSI Lightning - nixed, EVGA Classified - nixed) - so you're just paying extra for a slightly higher factory OC.
 
Yeah, this will be just like the 690, no custom coolers outside of waterblocks. Just backplates, airflow brackets and the likes.

COME ON BARBIE LETS GO PARTY
fucking danes lol

Whoa, WHOA! HOLD THE FUCK UP SON - You dissin' our national anthem?!
 
So there really is no point in waiting for a SC version of this since I'll be slapping a water block and over clocking myself. Or is there something else I'm missing about the SC version?
 
Just checked the order page on Caseking. Said 25/2 on the card when I ordered and here, 20 minutes later it says 1/3 - So start of March. Then the doubt kicks in; did I get the initial batch or did I get kicked back in queue as well. Order still processing.
 

I know, my english is "l'horreur"

I had sli setups several times and I have always sought mainboards with much separation between the slots so that both cards have good air circulation.

But when I ride more than two cards, fans are hidden and not enough cold air can enter to the gpus.

I mean something like this

geforce-gtx-titan-016-650px2.png
 
1080p/120hz, yes.

1080p/60hz, no.

:P

I know, my english is "l'horreur"

I had sli setups several times and I have always sought mainboards with much separation between the slots so that both cards have good air circulation.

But when I ride more than two cards, fans are hidden and not enough cold air can enter to the gpus.

I mean something like this

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-...NORVTgU/s576/geforce-gtx-titan-016-650px2.png

Correct me if I'm wrong but the main intake is not at the fan. The fan sucks in the air at the back and shoots it out the front, so closing the front doesn't matter too much.

Just have to worry about a supply of fresh air coming from the front of the case.
 
1080p/60hz, no.

:P



Correct me if I'm wrong but the main intake is not at the fan. The fan sucks in the air at the back and shoots it out the front, so closing the front doesn't matter too much.


¿?

The fan moves the air from the interior of the chassis through the metal plate with mini slots. This air collects heat from the metal and takes it out behind the computer.
 
The bad news is that while GTX 680 shipped with a max power target of 132%, Titan is again only 106%. Once you do hit that TDP limit you only have 6% (15W) more to go, and that’s it. Titan essentially has more headroom out of the box, but it will have less headroom for making adjustments. So hardcore overclockers dreaming of slamming 400W through Titan will come away disappointed, though it goes without saying that Titan’s power delivery system was never designed for that in the first place. All indications are that NVIDIA built Titan’s power delivery system for around 265W, and that’s exactly what buyers will get.

Second, let’s talk about overvolting. What we didn’t realize on Tuesday but realize now is that overvolting as implemented in Titan is not overvolting in the traditional sense, and practically speaking I doubt too many hardcore overclockers will even recognize it as overvolting. What we mean by this is that overvolting was not implemented as a direct control system as it was on past generation cards, or even the NVIDIA-nixed cards like the MSI Lightning or EVGA Classified.

Overvolting is instead a set of two additional turbo clock bins, above and beyond Titan’s default top bin. On our sample the top bin is 1.625v, which corresponds to a 992MHz core clock. Overvolting Titan to 1.2 means unlocking two more bins: 1006MHz @ 1.175v, and 1019MHz @ 1.2v. Or put another way, overvolting on Titan involves unlocking only another 27MHz in performance.
NVIDIA, stop being such a chicken. You sell a $1000 card to enthusiasts and then try to reinvent the world 'overvolt' to mean something else, and think that will placate people?

WTF is this?
EVGA is going to have all of their usual flavors at some point...my guess the non-reference ones will come out in ~90 day increments from this launch. Except the Hydro Coppers which will be like 6-8 months from now. :-P

http://www.evga.com/articles/00729/

Kingpin with the Titan - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDAA7KNoqec

EDIT: 4-way SLI CONFIRMED with TITAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1) Awww yisss!!!!

2) Hydro Copper Blocks are terrible. They mill out the water channels in the acrylic, and then have a thin copper plate. Then they have the gall to charge more than proper blocks from Aquacomputer or Heatkiller.
 
NVIDIA, stop being such a chicken. You sell a $1000 card to enthusiasts and then try to reinvent the world 'overvolt' to mean something else, and think that will placate people?

WTF is this?

The new normal. Only Kingpin gets access to the real deal OC.
 
Maybe for NVIDIA it is.

Even then, I appreciate honesty. When NVIDIA flat out said, "Our AICs have decided to remove the features due to losing out on RMA from us because these cards die super quick when you overvolt them". I didn't bitch once about the lack of OC capability.

Dangling it in front of the face of enthusiasts, and then disguising features that people are asking for as something else entirely is extremely disingenuous and honestly offensive.
 
Maybe for NVIDIA it is.

Even then, I appreciate honesty. When NVIDIA flat out said, "Our AICs have decided to remove the features due to losing out on RMA from us because these cards die super quick when you overvolt them". I didn't bitch once about the lack of OC capability.

Dangling it in front of the face of enthusiasts, and then disguising features that people are asking for as something else entirely is extremely disingenuous and honestly offensive.

The great thing is AMD is still rocking in this area. One reason why I'll definitely still go AMD when they drop their new shiz in late '13 or early '14. The most fun cards to play with. Do you still have that ASUS MATRIX 7970GE Plat?
 
lol I don't want it back. :) I am hoping to buy 4 Titans I need my pennies.

Tom's benches are up:

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-titan-performance-review,3442.html#xtor=RSS-998

Their wrap-up really does make the case for who should and who should not be buying a Titan.

I'm glad I read the Conclusion page. It put me on the right path, I think. That is a 680/7970 or waiting until Winter for the next generation. If I had a triple-monitor setup instead of this IPS display that cost damn near as much as 3 monitors, I would want a Titan for sure.
 
Fuuu

I need a titan. Well don't need as this is a luxury item but whatever.

It's specifically geared towards my type of setup and I missed out on the evga pre order :l
 
Man those CF results that PCPer show in their Titan review are so bad. I'm still not sure if I agree with how they determine what a 'usable frame' is. But even ignoring that and only looking at the Fraps results is ridiculous. I thought the last catalyst update was supposed to help out their consistency quite a bit. It must only have patched single GPU performance in those specific games.
 
I know, my english is "l'horreur"

I had sli setups several times and I have always sought mainboards with much separation between the slots so that both cards have good air circulation.

But when I ride more than two cards, fans are hidden and not enough cold air can enter to the gpus.

I mean something like this

geforce-gtx-titan-016-650px2.png

The thing is radial fans would just blow air out the top. Imagine that... white thing is a radial fan. The arrows show where the air would go. The actual airflow is more curved and in a blower card the air is directed one way. Don't know how the Titan doesn't blow too much air out the rear, but I'm guessing it is much easier for the air to go over the big heatsink (tighter fins over the VRM) to force the majority to cool the GPU.

BTW, that pic took way too much effort. I gave the center "fan" 1024 edges and thanks to the cycles rendering with 150 samples and a huge ring lighting everything up it took my 3570k 35 seconds to render that simple graphic :P
The white backgound is a part of the light source with rays being rendered and reflected and it's still flawed with some random dots because 150 samples wasn't quite enough. As you can see I need a Titan :(
 
Man those CF results that PCPer show in their Titan review are so bad. I'm still not sure if I agree with how they determine what a 'usable frame' is. But even ignoring that and only looking at the Fraps results is ridiculous. I thought the last catalyst update was supposed to help out their consistency quite a bit. It must only have patched single GPU performance in those specific games.
They don't show what drivers they used. Most websites do not rerun benches for every new test.

Plus:

If you haven't been following our sequence of stories that investigates a completely new testing methodology we are calling "frame rating", then you are really missing out. (Part 1 is here, part 2 is here.) The basic premise of Frame Rating is that the performance metrics that the industry is gathering using FRAPS are inaccurate in many cases and do not properly reflect the real-world gaming experience the user has.

Because of that, we are working on another method that uses high-end dual-link DVI capture equipment to directly record the raw output from the graphics card with an overlay technology that allows us to measure frame rates as they are presented on the screen, not as they are presented to the FRAPS software sub-system. With these tools we can measure average frame rates, frame times and stutter, all in a way that reflects exactly what the viewer sees from the game.

Also, better 95th and 99th percentile frame times than the 690 at 1080p. I knew the FPS benches would be hiding this. This is, for all intents and purposes, a better performing card than the 690.

skyrim-19x10-per.png
 
Yea with your setup, I'd have to have one.

HAVE TO.

I just read through the toms article... Great read. What I took from it is a 690 is still king if your going for a one card solution. However the performance of sli titans at 5760x1080/1200 and 2560x1600 hit me in the weak spot.

Now that I've seen the benches I don't want anything other than two. Amazing performance.
 
Top Bottom