Hari Seldon
Member
Unions should have to pay half of any incompetent cop related lawsuit.
One of the most frustrating things about these lawsuits is that there is no consequences for the NYPD or the officer. The $3M will be paid by taxpayers and the officer won't be fired, docked pay or anything.
Something needs to be done about these payouts maybe along the lines of "10% needs to be paid by the officer who the lawsuit was against" otherwise there won't be any changes and taxpayers will be left footing the bill once this happens again with no consequences for the NYPD.
yea. The nypd acts like theres no consequences to their actions...
because there are none :\
But thats the same for all cops. Their pensions or Unions need to be hit. Only way for progress.
For real. So long as they know that they won't flip the bill and only the taxpayers will, they'll keep going around hurting people with reckless abandon.Fuck that. 100% of the bill should be footed by the officer, at least in this instance. Cops would think twice before being massive cunts if they knew they'd be held just as accountable as any other person, and that they wouldn't be bailed out by their higher-ups/the taxpayer.
The officer here absolutely deserves to be personally sued for $3 million.
Amazingly, the prisoners were more humane than the NYPD.
Can't make this shit up.
But the police aren't a gang, right?
It's because the prisons are filled with poor people who didn't do anything wrong.Amazingly, the prisoners were more humane than the NYPD.
Can't make this shit up.
They probably have higher body counts than terrorist groups.
The unions? B-b-but you're a liberal.
I don't know what makes sense anymore.![]()
The cop should have shown more empathy, absolutely. And it looked like he was probably speeding.
But, the old man was crossing the street illegally, was he not? It looked like he was literally walking across the middle of a street, with no crosswalks or intersections, at a slow pace. And it seemed very possible that, in order to avoid this pedestrian who should not have been in the middle of the street, the cop had to swerve and try to avoid him (unsuccessfully), causing the cop to possibly crash and endanger the cop's life.
That seems to be the cop's argument from what I can gather. Seems somewhat reasonable, taken disparately from his other deplorable actions.
What am I missing here with all of this rage? Guy was walking across street and looks like the cop laid down his bike to try and avoid him. Is it just because he arrested him after the fact?
Probably shouldn't have been arrested at all. Some of these comments and hyperbole in this thread caught me off guard.Did you see the video? Why should he have been arrested after the fact anyway?
Fuck that. 100% of the bill should be footed by the officer, at least in this instance. Cops would think twice before being massive cunts if they knew they'd be held just as accountable as any other person, and that they wouldn't be bailed out by their higher-ups/the taxpayer.
The officer here absolutely deserves to be personally sued for $3 million.
But, the old man was crossing the street illegally, was he not? It looked like he was literally walking across the middle of a street, with no crosswalks or intersections, at a slow pace. And it seemed very possible that, in order to avoid this pedestrian who should not have been in the middle of the street, the cop had to swerve and try to avoid him (unsuccessfully), causing the cop to possibly crash and endanger the cop's life.
What am I missing here with all of this rage? Guy was walking across street and looks like the cop laid down his bike to try and avoid him. Is it just because he arrested him after the fact?
Holy fuck that video D:
Sorry but what's jaywalking by the way?
Goldstein added that Hopper was suspended from the police force in 2009 for pulling a gun on another officer.
Isn't that when you're walking in the road with no regard for oncoming traffic?
Holy fuck that video D:
Sorry but what's jaywalking by the way?
Isn't that when you're walking in the road with no regard for oncoming traffic? That certainly doesn't include crossing the road after looking both ways.
Usually, crossing the street at anywhere else but the crosswalk/corner (or against the don't walk sign). Technically illegal, but pretty much ubiquitous in NY, and only selectively enforced (usually due to contempt of cop or a CYA situation like this one). But it doesn't even matter in this case, because he wasn't jaywalking. The cop was speeding and lost control, 100% his fault. Only reason he couldn't weasel his way out of it is due to the security cam footage.
1. Speed on scooter.
2. Hit elderly old man with such force that he breaks his neck.
3. Deny proper medical attention for the man whose neck you broke.
4. Arrest man whose neck you broke.
5. Lie on report about man whose neck you broke.
6. Cause elderly man's wife to die of heart attack.
7. Make tax payers pay for the above insanity.
8. Continue to work with no consequences for above insanity because you're part of a corrupt and broken institution.
Why should ANYBODY believe a single word any police officer says in instances where there is even a shred of doubt as to what actually transpired is beyond me. If this wasn't on camera this man would probably be in jail and/or dead for crossing the street. And yet people here and elsewhere will defend them tooth and nail and victim blame until they are blue in the face. Ugh.
And Flores's wife, who had been diagnosed with dementia a month before he was struck in 2012, was so worried that her husband would be put in jail for endangering a police officer that she suffered a heart attack three months later and died.
Anyone ever notice how union- busting is a major part of US history and it still occurs now in the 21st century (see Walmart thing all over the places like fast food restaurants). Where I live, public transportation workers are unionized and many in city administration don't like it at all and would love to do away with that union any chance they get.
But notice how police unions are completely unscathed... the only union the establishment loves unconditionally.
But, the old man was crossing the street illegally, was he not? It looked like he was literally walking across the middle of a street, with no crosswalks or intersections, at a slow pace. And it seemed very possible that, in order to avoid this pedestrian who should not have been in the middle of the street, the cop had to swerve and try to avoid him (unsuccessfully), causing the cop to possibly crash and endanger the cop's life.
.
I imagine a wall of lawyers, and a lobby, could make it so the Unions are on the hook for this, or the actual PD, or something.
Why can't legal gaf fix this?
halp.
Yep. That was exactly what I was getting at.They're the last line of defense between the aristocracy and the scary poors. It's not going to change.