The above is almost entirely calorie-free from a conversational standpoint.
If you read more, your communication skills would likely improve.
You should read more. Not just spot-checking wikipedia with a confirmation bias for less than five minutes when challenged to educate yourself on a larger topic that is relevant to the larger context of the discussion at hand.
All of which you've now admitted to twice.
Besides: in a forum where the primary mode of communication is text (although gif & emoji are getting up there) a willingness to read for long periods of time seems like it would be helpful in general.
Wow. My attempt to get educated on a subject I admittedly stated as knowing nothing about and digging into the issue through the use of Wikipedia, all at your request, apparently gives you the right to criticize my communication skills. Cause you must have a deep knowledge of how well I am at communicating things right?
Then you characterize me as having to admit things twice as if I ever denied anything in the first place.
All this, while ignoring my questions on the subject at hand and still offering no reasons as to why I should think her opinions on the GamerGate controversy are at all relevent to her confirmed reporting on Trump-Russa.