Fancyarcher
Member
Wait....he did an interview with the NYT? I can't believe he even did that.
He's an idiot that's why. The "failing NYT" is only good when it's spotlighting him, only this interview didn't make him look good.
Wait....he did an interview with the NYT? I can't believe he even did that.
She heard about the Scalise incident. She's worried she'll face a similar fate.Safety from Democrats she will say.
She's ready, folks.
Moscow (CNN)A Russian lawyer who attended a controversial June 2016 meeting with Donald Trump Jr. at Trump Tower told CNN on Wednesday that she is willing to testify before the US Senate.
Asked by CNN if she is willing to testify before the US Senate, Natalia Veselnitskaya texted back: "Yes, I'm ready, if I will be provided with guarantees for my safety. I do not intend to say anything more, on the advice of my lawyers."
Lawyer offers 'real, true story'
Veselnitskaya told the Russian government-backed media outlet RT on Tuesday that she was ready to testify before the US Congress in order to clarify the "mass hysteria" around her story, if it was done within a legal framework and her safety was assured.
Oh FUCK YEAH
Bring an interpreter?How is she going to testify if she doesn't speak english? I don't think I've ever seen a hearing with someone who spoke another language.
There's this certain mystique about celebrity that compels people to put them on some kind of elevated plateau on a subconscious level.
Which is rather absurd considering that they're just human beings like anyone else... susceptible to the same faults and idiosyncrasies.
They just happen to have more fame/money/followers on YouTube or whatever to distinguish them.
And that shit is simply numbers. Most of which are meaningless.
Fuck yeah what? She's going to tell the story she's been telling all along and has no fear of lying as a Russian national. There's no way she would ever be extradited for perjury.
Yeah this is going to be a thing that totally validates Don Jr.'s claims.She's ready, folks.
Moscow (CNN)A Russian lawyer who attended a controversial June 2016 meeting with Donald Trump Jr. at Trump Tower told CNN on Wednesday that she is willing to testify before the US Senate.
Asked by CNN if she is willing to testify before the US Senate, Natalia Veselnitskaya texted back: "Yes, I'm ready, if I will be provided with guarantees for my safety. I do not intend to say anything more, on the advice of my lawyers."
Lawyer offers 'real, true story'
Veselnitskaya told the Russian government-backed media outlet RT on Tuesday that she was ready to testify before the US Congress in order to clarify the "mass hysteria" around her story, if it was done within a legal framework and her safety was assured.
Mr. Trump... warned that investigators would cross a red line if they delve into Trump family finances unrelated to Russia.
Bring an interpreter?
They'd probably bring in someone who has experience as a court interpreter. I don't know of any examples of an interpreter at a congressional hearing, but the court system definitely deals with cases where a witness, for example, doesn't speak english. I don't think it would be significantly different here.If anyone can find an example of this happening at a previous hearing I'd like to see how it works.
Place this in the context that Trump fired the NY Attorney, Preet Bharara, after promising not to do so; Bharara was the State Attorney with jurisdiction to investigate the Trump Organisation and was reportedly doing so at the time.
It is very clear that Trump companies are a nest of illegal activity and will not withstand scrutiny. He has faced countless civil lawsuits which he has always settled, but he can't just throw money at a criminal charge. It's amazed me that he has managed to escape criminal investigation so far, really.
They'd probably bring in someone who has experience as a court interpreter. I don't know of any examples of an interpreter at a congressional hearing, but the court system definitely deals with cases where a witness, for example, doesn't speak english. I don't think it would be significantly different here.
Place this in the context that Trump fired the NY Attorney, Preet Bharara, after promising not to do so; Bharara was the State Attorney with jurisdiction to investigate the Trump Organisation and was reportedly doing so at the time.
It is very clear that Trump companies are a nest of illegal activity and will not withstand scrutiny. He has faced countless civil lawsuits which he has always settled, but he can't just throw money at a criminal charge. It's amazed me that he has managed to escape criminal investigation so far, really.
In the interview, Mr. Trump said he believes Mr. Comey told him about the dossier to implicitly make clear he had something to hold over the president. In my opinion, he shared it so that I would think he had it out there, Mr. Trump said. As leverage? Yeah, I think so, Mr. Trump said. In retrospect.
The president dismissed the assertions in the dossier: When he brought it to me, I said this is really, made-up junk. I didnt think about any of it. I just thought about man, this is such a phony deal.
He's terrified Mueller will look into his family finances. That's where all the real dirt is I'd guess.
I have a feeling hes terrified about all his rich friends knowing just how in debt and poor he actually is. The thought of his financial standings being brought to light and everyone seeing what a financial liability he really is and his emperor's clothes out in the open is what eats at him the most. As far as Trump is concerned its fuck the country protect my ego.
It was good. We are very close. It's a tough — you know, health care. Look, Hillary Clinton worked eight years in the White House with her husband as president and having majorities and couldn't get it done. Smart people, tough people — couldn't get it done. Obama worked so hard. They had 60 in the Senate. They had big majorities and had the White House. I mean, ended up giving away the state of Nebraska. They owned the state of Nebraska. Right. Gave it away. Their best senator did one of the greatest deals in the history of politics. What happened to him?
But I think we are going to do O.K. I think we are going to see. I mean, one of my ideas was repeal. But I certainly rather would get repeal and replace, because the next last thing I want to do is start working tomorrow morning on replace. And it is time. It is tough. It's a very narrow path, winding this way. You think you have it, and then you lose four on the other side because you gave. It is a brutal process. And it was for Democrats, in all fairness.
I mean, you think of Hillary Clinton, and you look, she went eight years — very capable — went eight years as the first lady, and could not get health care. So this is not an easy crack. The one thing I'll say about myself, so, Obama was in there for eight years and got Obamacare. Hillary Clinton was in there eight years and they never got Hillarycare, whatever they called it at the time. I am not in here six months, and they'll say, ”Trump hasn't fulfilled his agenda." I say to myself, wait a minute, I'm only here a very short period of time compared to Obama. How long did it take to get Obamacare?
Hillary had to fix health care as first lady?
That's what Trump does. He threatens the people investigating him... and then he fires them when they don't cave to his threats.Yes Trump, threaten the man investigating you. Good idea, keep going
Coming off you firing the head of the FBI, it's the best idea. The best.
That's what Trump does. He threatens the people investigating him... and then he fires them when they don't cave to his threats.
He did it to Bharara.
He did it to Comey.
And he'll do it to Mueller... even if he has to lynch Sessions to do it.
Veselnitskaya is an unbearable blowhard and attention seeker, I don't expect anything new from her testimony except another tearful lecture on how Magnitsky Deserved It.
Trump has no concept of hypocrisy.Trump complaints about conflict of interest? Trump?
Oh that darn Comey, trying to blackmail the president with obviously false information!
To be fair, she was big on trying to get healthcare reform in the 90's. It was called Hillarycare as a slur because she was an easy target, but also because she spent a lot of effort on it. Though he is so god damn wrong about the amount of time spent on it. Obama spent ~1 year getting both healthcare reform and Dodd-Frank banking regulations through, and the ACA is way more comprehensive than this shitty ass Republican bill. On top of that, they had to get 60 votes meaning every single democrat had to be in line as well as Lieberman because of the death of Ted Kennedy.
He is the perfect example of the mouth moving faster than the brain. You can see his brain catching up here in realtime.
Fun fact:
Trump, as some (not him) remember, infamously promised to repeal and replace Obamacare with something much better within a week/day/hour.
Did Trump spend any time on the bill?
@blakehounshell
So this is weird, huh? Trump seems to suggest here that he'd heard about the Trump Jr. meeting, then says he hadn't.
I mean, he says clear as day that he knew about the meeting.
He came in thinking it was a business and thinking he could just yell at and shame people and they would get it done.Fun fact:
Trump, as some (not him) remember, infamously promised to repeal and replace Obamacare with something much better within a week/day/hour.
Did Trump spend any time on the bill?
Should probably be shouted from the rooftops as frequently as possible that Veselnitskaya's firm was in the midst of a NY court case when Bharara was fired.
They got a favorable settlement ruling just this spring.
All the pieces matter.
'I didn't know nothing'
No, he gives these interviews because he's a moron and needs attention. He has no 'masterplan'.It seems clear that Trump gives these interviews because he knows that it doesn't matter what he says, as long as the Republicans hold power nothing will be done to him. He does this to set the groundwork for the actions he'll take next which will clearly be to clean house at the Justice Dept. to restore "fairness" to his administration.
If the congressional Republicans stand by and let him do it then I'll know for sure that it isn't that they're afraid of him or being overwhelmed by their greed to keep him in power, they can largely achieve the same goals with Pence. If Trump is allowed to stop this investigation then the what the Republicans really want is to start to model the USA after Russia. A kleptocracy run by American oligarchs sounds like a right-wing wet dream.