The Trump administration on Friday escalated a battle with government ethics groups by declining, even in the face of a federal court order, to release a comprehensive list of individuals visiting with President Trump at his familys Mar-a-Lago resort during the two dozen days he spent at the private club in Palm Beach, Fla., this year.
The surprising move by the Department of Justice, which had been ordered in July to make the visitors log public, came after weeks of promotion by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, the liberal nonprofit group known as CREW, that it would soon be getting the Mar-a-Lago visitors logs.
Instead, on Friday the Justice Department released a State Department list of just 22 names all of them members of the delegation of the Japanese prime minister who visited the club in February for a meeting with President Trump.
But the Department of Justice, in a statement it sent to CREW, said it had decided not to release the names of everyone visiting with the president at Mar-a-Lago.
The remaining records that the Secret Service has processed in response to the Mar-a-Lago request contain, reflect, or otherwise relate to the presidents schedules, Chad A. Readler, acting assistant attorney general, wrote in response to CREW in a letter dated Tuesday, but delivered on Friday. The government believes that presidential schedule information is not subject to FOIA.
Noah Bookbinder, CREWs executive director, said that the organization would challenge the Justice Departments decision. The Obama administration had faced a similar lawsuit before it decided in late 2009 to start to make visitor logs public, a practice that stopped with Mr. Trumps arrival.
After waiting months for a response to our request for comprehensive visitor logs from the presidents multiple visits to Mar-a-Lago and having the government ask for a last minute extension, today we received 22 names from the Japanese prime ministers visit to Mar-a-Lago and nothing else, Mr. Bookbinder said in a statement. The government does not believe that they need to release any further Mar-a-Lago visitor records. We vehemently disagree. The government seriously misrepresented their intentions to both us and the court. This was spitting in the eye of transparency. We will be fighting this in court.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/15/...-at-mar-a-lago.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur
Impeach me if old.