There is no Epstein Client List
- Thread starter YCoCg
- Start date
kapshin
Member
This.
12Goblins
Lil’ Gobbie
Yes, Trump won't release the list that includes Hakeem Jeffries, Chuck Schumer, and definitely does not include DJT. What is this logic?
ProtoByte
Weeb Underling
Don't get suckered into Tucker's nonsense.
LegendOfKage
Member
If the list showed conclusive proof that happened, then why didn't the Biden and Harris administration release it?
The truth is, that list is about leverage. And it shows that both major political parties in the US care more about that leverage than they do getting justice for those children. That's an incredibly sad thing to realize.
kruis
Exposing the sinister cartel of retailers who allow companies to pay for advertising space.
You clearly didn't understand that tweet. The point was that the Democrats are ready to criticize Trump's decisions wherever and whenever they can. Trump reneging on a campaign promise is an easy win for them, but the Dems stayed mum. They've got just as much to win by burying this as Trump seems to have at this moment.
HeisenbergFX4
Member
Leverage or too much damage to both parties and mega wealthy elites world wide?
Rentahamster
Rodent Whores
Isn't that functionally the same thing due to mutually assured destruction?
Blackmail loses all its power once the cat is out of the bag and everyone's toast.
AJUMP23
Parody of actual AJUMP23
I'm adding content. Not commentary. Hard to believe it is anything other than a cover up.
HeisenbergFX4
Member
Personally don't think leverage and mutually assured destruction are the same things
Dr.Morris79
Gold Member
There's a fuck ton of a difference there chief...
Rentahamster
Rodent Whores
Not that they are the same things, but that they have both and must consider both. Some or all parties have leverage on some or all other parties, and they don't want to give it up due to want of power and/or they also don't want to give it up because there is a non-zero chance that using said leverage will also fuck their own shit up too.
swaffles23
Member
Trump got a little upset when that reporter brought up Jeffery Epstein possibly being a foreign agent(Mossad). Can't let it come out that our government has been compromised by our greatest ally and has many of them on film fucking kids
Rentahamster
Rodent Whores
Not that Elon is the great moral role model of our time, but he consorts with adult women and gets their consent. Big difference.
Dr.Morris79
Gold Member
chromhound
Member
Free Ghislaine then ?
12Goblins
Lil’ Gobbie
Yes, I understand. But what does Trump have to win if his name is not implicated? While It's true dems should be foaming at the mouth, it's safe to say at this point that democratic top dogs like Bill Clinton was likely fucking kids alongside his mega donor buddies, ie Bill Gates.
The part that makes no sense is the tweet saying Trump is not on the list. Why would he sit on this list if it rid him of any culpability in order to protect people like Jeffries, Schumer, etc?
Libs are more than happy incriminating their own if they were found to be fucking kids. Conservatives, well, to be determined. Right now I'm just seeing a lot of mental gymnastics building around the premise that Trump can't possibly be on the list, when its the most simple explanation as to why things are playing out the way they are
12Goblins
Lil’ Gobbie
Because it also incriminates them? I don't understand what is so hard to understand about this (╥﹏╥)
But yes, I agree it's incredibly sad but I hope this can serve as a point of reckoning for both constituencies to springboard us into a future less corrupted ʕ ꈍᴥꈍʔ
Last edited:
But he pays these women, the payments always contingent upon sticking to strict terms of a contract with regard to how they can live their lives from here on out.
It seems a scummy practice that can take advantage of women in bad situations, knowing they otherwise wouldn't have wanted that for their lives but can't resist the money.
Dr.Morris79
Gold Member
But you're missing the point of consent.
Donald mac Ronald
Member
It's funny how it's brought Americas left and right together to call this bullshit out. Coincidentally it's also brought the political establishment left and right together too.
When they originally raided Epstein island they found he had secret cameras everywhere. There are recordings of the rich and powerful fucking kids and it's sick. I assume it's already been destroyed.
When they originally raided Epstein island they found he had secret cameras everywhere. There are recordings of the rich and powerful fucking kids and it's sick. I assume it's already been destroyed.
It technically is, I get that. I never thought it wasn't. It's just ethically horrendous to dangle money in front of women to get them to become a loveless baby factory, where they then spend a lifetime dominated by Elon's judgment over whether they've been compliant enough to get their monthly allowance. He ends up with all the power. My original post wasn't meant to draw an equivalence, but lament that this is our society's standard now for who gets to judge Jeffrey Epstein.
My guess is that after a deep judicial review, there isn't strong enough evidence to convict most people on the list, so releasing it will just create a MOUNTAIN of slander and libel lawsuits from whoever gets named and shamed. Really, what actual actionable evidence can they really have? Just airplane logs ain't gonna cut it. Even a ledger full of "Bill Gates slept with Lisa Ann (age 16) on 3/3/2005" entries would get DESTROYED in court if 'Lisa Ann' doesn't show up to testify AND survive the character (and possibly literal) assassination headed her way. Ghislaine is keeping mum and that's probably keeping her alive. Those videos likely are not in possession of the US government, at least in a capacity where the AG can access them.
And the leverage provided against sooooooo many elites will serve the admin well.
Best we can probably hope for, outside of a Manning/Snowden hero, is a deadbed release of documents in 10-50 years, especially if (currently) living presidents are gonna get it. Clearly if Trump was on there and could be excised from the rest of the names he ABSOLUTELY would have been charged, no question. The DNC + MSM complicity could absolutely squash any mud slinging coming from Trump, at least up till Elon bout X. So they had TWO YEARS of the silly russiagate crap and never moved on epstein. Trump ain't gonna be a name on any 'list'.
And the leverage provided against sooooooo many elites will serve the admin well.
Best we can probably hope for, outside of a Manning/Snowden hero, is a deadbed release of documents in 10-50 years, especially if (currently) living presidents are gonna get it. Clearly if Trump was on there and could be excised from the rest of the names he ABSOLUTELY would have been charged, no question. The DNC + MSM complicity could absolutely squash any mud slinging coming from Trump, at least up till Elon bout X. So they had TWO YEARS of the silly russiagate crap and never moved on epstein. Trump ain't gonna be a name on any 'list'.
Buggy Loop
Member
Pam Bondi's reaction when she finally saw the peoples in the list
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Has anyone even said Thank You once?
Rentahamster
Rodent Whores
Has anyone even said Thank You once?
Thanks Obama
Toons
Member
Elon is now just a bridge troll vying for your attention because the admin is no longer giving it to them.
Just a couple weeks ago he was claiming he new Trump was on the list. Then backed off of that and now is throwing out memes.
The dudes no better than any of em. Hes only out for himself. He doesn't care about epsteins victims, this list, or who's on it unless they affect his bottom line and/or allow him to fellas his own ego.
Last edited:
Unknown?
Member
Probably also on the list, everyone at the top.
MrTroubleMaker
Member
Unknown?
Member
Definitely Lincoln and Martin Van Buren are not there either.