ErasureAcer
Banned
Bloodbeard said:I'll tell you what, they will be exactly how the people want them to be.
huh? neither funny or of practical value.
Bloodbeard said:I'll tell you what, they will be exactly how the people want them to be.
So....ineffectual and silly?Bloodbeard said:I'll tell you what, they will be exactly how the people want them to be.
Bloodbeard said:I'll tell you what, they will be exactly how the people want them to be.
I imagine you'll be waiting some time.Flying_Phoenix said:I really need a conservative. Jaydubya isn't on yet and this has me worried.
Yes, they are influencing the people who see them on the news to disregard their message, so you're correct.CHEEZMO said:They're still more influential than you.
elrechazao said:Yes, they are influencing the people who see them on the news to disregard their message, so you're correct.
Goya said:Policies that people say they support in surveys =/= policies that politicians need to support in order to get people to vote for them.
kame-sennin said:If people are disregarding the message, why is the movement growing?
kame-sennin said:That's the problem with the two party system.
Something Wicked said:Because, there are a lot of unemployed hippies out there that have nothing better to do- granted, they'd likely be still not be working if jobs were plentiful and the unemployment rate was under 2% instead of 9%+.
Despite their honest intentions, many of the Occupy Wall Street protesters are being suckered into a trap and calling for the very solutions that are part of the financial elites agenda to torpedo the American middle class higher taxes and more big government.
Watch the clip below in which journalist Adam Kokesh talks to Occupy Wall Street protesters.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFVR9Nv43J4
The ignorance displayed in these interviews knows no bounds. The protesters just dont get it. They are calling for the government to use force to impose their ideas, all in the name of bringing down corporations who they dont realize have completely bought off government regulators. Corporations and government enjoy a mutually beneficial relationship getting one to regulate the other is asinine and only hurts smaller businesses who are legitimately trying to compete in a free market economy that barely exists.
The zeal for totalitarian government amongst some of the protesters is shocking. One sign being carried around read, A government is an entity which holds the monopolistic right to initiate force, which seems a little ironic when protesters complain about being physically assaulted by police in the same breath.
One woman interviewed by Kokesh also announces her intention to help Obama to capture a second term. How can a self-proclaimed Occupy Wall Street protester simultaneously support the man whose 2008 campaign was bankrolled by Wall Street, whose 2012 campaign is reliant on Wall Street to an even greater extent, and whose cabinet was filled with Wall Street operatives?
Something is very wrong with this picture.
The usual suspects, mega-rich foundations and elitists, behind the young radicals have also started to emerge George Soros, The Ruckus Society, the Tides Foundation and the Ford Foundation.
The belated crusade against Wall Street is even more pathetic as it is coordinated by groups who wouldnt exist without men like Soros, who made their money from deals that make the Street look sparkling clean. Its class warfare as a cynical jab at the populist center, the people who mutter to themselves that the Street is full of crooks and so is Congress, writes Daniel Greenfield.
The thousands of Americans currently expressing their disgust at Wall Street and the bankers who have ruined the economy to the detriment of the poor and middle class should be commended for getting off their hind ends and doing something, unlike the millions who will continue to watch American Idol, drink beer and laugh in ignorance as the country is flushed down the toilet. It should also be added that there is a sprinkling of End the Fed demonstrators who truly understand the root cause of the problem.
However, the fact that the majority of the Occupy Wall Street demonstrators are advocating solutions which the very elite they claim to be protesting against also want should set alarm bells ringing.
The official Occupy Wall Street website vehemently supports Obamas tax agenda, again in the deluded belief that Obama, the ultimate Wall Street puppet, genuinely wants to go after big corporations who use loopholes to avoid paying income tax.
In calling for higher taxes on the middle class, the protesters are mimicking the likes of billionaire Warren Buffet. The top corporations pay virtually zero income tax because of loopholes that they have crafted in league with bought off government regulators. Obamas tax hikes will only impact genuine middle class businesses and middle class Americans earning over $200,000 with the rate of inflation as it is this can hardly be described as the super rich.
As Anthony Wile writes, the protesters are being completely misdirected by their socialist/communist leaders. The real center of financial control is the Federal Reserve and the city of London, and yet ideologue Michael Moore said earlier this week that ending capitalism was more important than dealing with the Fed.
Wile notes that the protesters seem obsessed with those who conduct financial transactions, not those who actually run global central banks, the real string pullers.
To get at the root of the problem, one should be protesting, say, in Londons City where central banking originated. Or protesting in front of the Federal Reserve in Washington DC.
These are real seats of power. But the shadowy and excessively powerful and wealthy individuals who have created the modern economic system are quite satisfied no doubt to have Wall Street take the blame. It suits their purposes, writes Wile.
It is too bad that the Occupy Wall Street movement seems to be obscuring the larger issues by apparently blaming the private (transactional) sector in entirety for what has occurred in the past few years.
Piss off with this shitty attitude. Seriously.Something Wicked said:Because, there are a lot of unemployed hippies out there that have nothing better to do- granted, they'd likely be still not be working if jobs were plentiful and the unemployment rate was under 2% instead of 9%+.
I'm still suprised any Ron Paul/small government people support this. Those protestors can freeze their ass off all winter, everyone knows at the end of the day they are going to vote for Obama and his democrats, and swallow their policies.Morn said:
Morn said:
Now who's projecting?elrechazao said:Yes, they are influencing the people who see them on the news to disregard their message, so you're correct.
Morn said:
travisbickle said:Morn, I am assuming you will be going to the "Occupy the Fed" rally mentioned in the article? That was the whole point of the article, don't blame Wall Street blame the Fed. Good luck, I admire you.
Ether_Snake said:Blah blah blah, what a pointless article. It tries to paint the protest with one brush stroke. What a joke!
People are protesting because they are fed up.
Look at how things went in the Great Depression. It wasn't people going in the streets over one issue, it was people fed up. It turned out for the best in the end. The more people protest, the better. It's all about getting the balance of politics to tip back onto the side of the people, rather than the side of corporations.
This might just be the start of a counter-Tea Party movement, which is expected.
Nature at work.
You seriously posted an article from infowars? The comments you got were better then I expected. You deserved to get laughed out of the threadMorn said:
SolKane said:One of the many incorrect things in that article, since several of these protests are already targeting local Federal Reserve banks, e.g. Boston, Minneapolis.
SolKane said:One of the many incorrect things in that article, since several of these protests are already targeting local Federal Reserve banks, e.g. Boston, Minneapolis.
Be sure to edit it thoroughly.Flying_Phoenix said:Podcast recording is done.
Jaydubya showed up!
I'll have it up either late late tonight or tomorrow morning.
I'll post a link when its done.
Morn said:
Well, right now, the protest is pretty small, only a few dozen protesters, and only in a single corner of McPherson Square, but it isn't really organized yet. Also there was confusion about when it would be starting, as there was another event for Occupy DC scheduled for the 6th, so I'd be watching to see what happens on the 6th.magicstop said:I'm pretty excited about the Occupy DC movement coming up, and I hope DC-GAF will keep up informed.
cooljeanius said:Well, right now, the protest is pretty small, only a few dozen protesters, and only in a single corner of McPherson Square, but it isn't really organized yet. Also there was confusion about when it would be starting, as there was another event for Occupy DC scheduled for the 6th, so I'd be watching to see what happens on the 6th.
milkyjay20 said:if this ever gets co-opted by the democrats, this protest will lose its power. so if hillary clinton or obama shows up, reject them. hell, i'm wary of even michael moore running his gullet. this protest needs a strong voice from the people themselves rather than an establishment figure.
I tend to agree. One of the main reasons nothing is getting done is because of how divided the country is. The left and the right need to find common ground, and that won't happen if this movement is seen as a leftist thing. It being co-opted by Democrat politicians and polarizing figures like Michael Moore will not help in that regard.milkyjay20 said:if this ever gets co-opted by the democrats, this protest will lose its power. so if hillary clinton or obama shows up, reject them. hell, i'm wary of even michael moore running his gullet. this protest needs a strong voice from the people themselves rather than an establishment figure.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politic...wall-street-drawing-the-battle-lines-20110927AstroLad said:has taibbi commented on this at all?
He said he was going to go to it and write something up... I don't know if he's actually written on it yet. I'll try and find the small blog he made.AstroLad said:has taibbi commented on this at all?
It's a bit to late for that. Moore and other leftist celebrities have been there and were treated like celebrities.demon said:I tend to agree. One of the main reasons nothing is getting done is because of how divided the country is. The left and the right need to find common ground, and that won't happen if this movement is seen as a leftist thing. It being co-opted by Democrat politicians and polarizing figures like Michael Moore will not help in that regard.
Rocket Scientist said:http://i.imgur.com/G8uRD.jpg[/url]
[url]http://i.imgur.com/CxVda.jpg[/url]
[url]http://i.imgur.com/YZL4r.jpg[/url]
Now carry on as usual.[/QUOTE]
Name names.
Polari said:Reading that list of grievances, what a fucking joke. Makes it seem like a platform for every left-leaning activist to tie their interest to. I don't know what the protesters expect to happen. They'll lose steam after a few more weeks and everything will return to normal. These people aren't for real, they're not about to put their lives on the line for this shit and do something meaningful.
They're unrealistic demands but reasonable ones nonetheless. The very notion of those ideas being considering "left-leaning" is exactly what's wrong with the right and why I'm proud to consider myself a liberal.Polari said:Reading that list of grievances, what a fucking joke. Makes it seem like a platform for every left-leaning activist to tie their interest to. I don't know what the protesters expect to happen. They'll lose steam after a few more weeks and everything will return to normal. These people aren't for real, they're not about to put their lives on the line for this shit and do something meaningful.
demon said:Also, "put their lives on the line"? What the fuck does that even mean?
lol?Polari said:It means Arab Spring, Red Army Faction they are not. If these people were truly oppressed by corporations, they'd be bombing Wall Street rather than "occupying" it.
The Arab spring has been a largely peaceful movement. It only got violent in Libya when Qaddafi decided to kill all the protestersPolari said:It means Arab Spring, Red Army Faction they are not. If these people were truly oppressed by corporations, they'd be bombing Wall Street rather than "occupying" it.