After seeing that Kidman botch, I needed to take my mind off it with a glorious SSP.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqW8oJ6QlAs
Goddamn cameraman...
So we talked about powerbombs yesterday but now today the question is:
Who has the finest vertical suplex of all time?
So we talked about powerbombs yesterday but now today the question is:
Who has the finest vertical suplex of all time?
Yes, that's bulldog. Yes, he suplexed Vader.
I think I can get behind this Impact365 thing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9K23FIqj9E
Yep. I can definitely get behind that.
After that piss poor AA that Cena landed on Sandow Monday, I started to think how lame of a finisher it really is.
It's really just a shitty version of Brock's F5.
Demolition and Big Boss Man are AWESOME.
.
First off, the idea of Ric Flair eating pussy is absolutely disgusting.
Kimona Wanaleya/Leia Meow, Leilani Kai, Jumping Bomb Angels, Bull Nakano, and at least one other Asian female wrestler I'm forgetting who lasted long enough to get their name known.
I hear you US-folk do your dressing up parties tonight.
I don't mind the possibility of a turn, but I hope they give him a manager or team him up with a strong speaker. He does well in the silent enforcer-type role.
On a side note, my band played a Halloween show last night and we dressed up like the Dudley Boyz. Not many people picked up on who we were, but it was a blast nonetheless.
There are serious sale talks going on behind the scenes. After we reported it over the weekend, a lot of places ran with borderline ridiculous stories. What I can say at this point is that there is a potential buyer that has been looking at the company. Reps for the potential new ownership group have been at the offices. Talk of a potential sale has been going on for months, but has reached a serious enough point where things are at a significant stage. It is not entirely clear who will end up in power and run the company if and when the deal being negotiated goes through, and what percentage of the company, or if the entire company, is what is being negotiated. One source with significant knowledge of what is going down said the new group is unlikely to get involved without owning a controlling interest. Also, regarding speculation in various media of names involved, all of the speculation is way off, that much I know. It doesn't appear Viacom has any interest in buying the company (even though TNA gets far better ratings than Bellator, it's not as valuable because it can't get the corporate sponsors or ad revenue) and the parties involved come from outside the pro wrestling industry. The people who have at least been negotiating the most seriously are not from Viacom. The people involved have been successful in a number of other businesses. Just my gut says they are buying it more as a television property with the idea that future rights fees as those number escalate for sports will make it valuable.
The fact sale negotiations are as far along as they are and Hulk Hogan wasn't signed seems to indicate the new ownership group didn't feel he was a priority in the deal, or else TNA would have been aggressive in locking him up.
WON on TNA sale:
Good for her, but she killed her gimmick. Stan Hansen never would have lost 50 pounds and got some abs in his heyday.
TAJIRI beat TAKA. Sounds like it was a decent match too.
Syuri beat some jobber. I don't care about the rest of WNC.
Forbes did a feature on WWE's upcoming TV licensing deal with NBC Universal and noted that WWE is expected to receive 4 to 6 times their current $140 million per year deal. That would top NASCAR's $4.5 billion, 10 year contract.
I can get you some silicone and a block sized jaw dude, no problem.
WWE Financials came out. So more pay per view Buyrates came in:
Summerslam:
2013: 298,000 buys
2012: 358,000 buys
2011: 296,000 buys
2010: 350,000 buys
2009: 369,000 buys ($5 lower PPV price)
Money in the Bank:
2013: 199,000 buys
2012: 188,000 buys
2011: 195,000 buys
2010: 165,000 buys
2009: 267,000 buys ($5 lower PPV price)
Night of Champions:
2013: 175,000 buys
2012: 189,000 buys
2011: 161,000 buys
2010: 165,000 buys
I don't know why Summerslam did bad but it seems the B pay per views are doing better buy rates then during the 2010-2011 days.
Also, WWE is going to make a lot of money when the licensing deal is up according to forbes:
This has got to be one of the least appealing thing women can do.
Seriously, this does nothing for me other than remind me of jello.
Wow, that BossMan is spot on!
Always had a soft spot for Big BossMan. When he came back in the late 90's, I was heading out for a family vacation and saw him at the airport. I walked up and he was on the phone with his wife, and when he saw me coming up, he said "Honey, I need to call you right back." He sat and chatted with me for a good 20 minutes.
what's wrong with jello?/IMG]
I dunno how Summerslam did so bad with two legit dream matches (Punk/Lesnar and Cena/Bryan) and the most solid midcard in ages. Not only was it two dream matches, it was two dream matches that were dream matches for completely different reasons, and both of them delivered....
So strange...that was one of the lowest Summerslams in history....it only beat 2011 in recent history and 2011 had one of the worst cards ever...main evented by two rematches (Orton/Christian had been seen about five times already) and had no undercard at all
Those are/were dream matches?