What he did or did not do is immaterial right now. We're not going to modkill or anything over a rule that's never been stated before. (Unless Ynnny or Royal feel really strongly otherwise.) However, the rule is set now.
No, if he did or didn't put me on ignore is important right now. I didn't mention modkilling or anything happening to him. So please don't make it seem that way with my response to you.
Splinter seems to be trying to make it out as an intentional play to try and judge responses.. If he didn't actually put me on ignore and just said it and gauged reactions, ok, fine.
Your statement saying "I'm certain that Splinter doesn't actually have Zeke on ignore"
Could be argued that he really didn't put me on ignore and it really was a gambit, at least in my mind. If you did the same post w/o the bold, I would've never had a problem with the post. Maybe I'm over thinking it. If I am, my bad.
With this post he
did put me on ignore. Now that we know that, we can go look at the "gambit"/"bad play" or w/e he wants to call it.
And now I see Zeke arguing with the one person who won't respond to him. Super.
*Splinter 10:20am said:
I've got Zeke on ignore to avoid a repeat of yesterday. Let me know if he says something that isn't drivel.
Sophia 10:28am said:
Splinter did put me on ignore, so he didn't see my vote. So for him, Sophia is the only vote for him.
*Splinter 10:33 said:
See this is my problem. I do something clearly stupid and """""anti town""""" and see who jumps on it, and then the confirmed townie goes for it every time. Are you hunting for scum or """""bad play"""""?
So he wanted to see who jumped on it after letting it sit for 13min?
After seeing my argument, he backtracks saying it was a bad play instead.
It wasn't a gambit, that was just a potential upside to an otherwise bad play.
Ok I guess. But in his response to splinter he puts "anti town" and "bad play" in quotes like he knows what he was doing.
=====================================
The premise in the "Splinter lynch tells something about you" was that you continue the case against him and commit to him by having a vote on him at the day's end. If this happens, and he flips town, it would look bad on you. I think gorlak is town. You hound him. You hound Splinter. He dies and flips town. Bad. In the opposite case, you would be receiving #townpoints.
I wasn't hounding Splinter, I don't even think I really said anything substantial about Splinters until the later part of this day phase. My suspicions on Splinter were mostly a response to Sophia asking what I thought about him. If anything Splinter was the one hounding me about why Gorlak took the vig shot.
I'm willing to take w/e consequences/scum reads for me that would come with a town gorlak flip. I've argued my case and to me it makes sense and could be possible.
Splinter though? That vote was 99% percent because of his ignore thing and his shitty attitude. Even when I argued that Splinter could be scum, I kept my vote on Gorlak. But a supposed town player puts someone on ignore?