I usually don't get into Kobe Bryant rape discussions/arguments but for you I'll make an exception.
To assume that Kobe Bryant RAPED, not had sex with the "victim" is just that--an ASSUMPTION. None of us were there, so none of us know.
What we DO know is:
-The semen of other men was found in the panties that the girl had on the night of the alleged crime.
-She was more anxious to settle as she was not interested in testifying. Wouldn't you want to see the person who commited such a terrible violation of you go to jail? Would money be enough?
Wait, before you answer that with, oh Kobe had money and she would have never won, blah, blah,blah, let's think back on another athlete who had tremedous amounts of money and was accused of rape--Mike Tyson.
Did his victim take the money and run? No. She pressed charges to the point that it went to trial and Tyson was CONVICTED and SENT TO PRISON.
Faber could always have gotten money in the long run, (writing books, making appearances on talk shows, suing Kobe in a civil trial) AFTER sending this to trial and showing enough evidence to CONVICT him.
But she didn't.
She took the money and ran.
So based on everything I've just mentioned, (that are fact, not an ASSumption of guilt) there is no validity to your statement.