ninj4junpei said:I definitely believe that Moffat is not done with the Weeping Angels. He still hasn't explained how they are created.
In 'old' Who, it's been stated a few times that a Time Lord can regenerate 12 times, so they can have 13 lives. This is currently the 11th Doctor.Linkified said:Right with this talk of regenerations and what not. Don't Timelords in general have a fixed number of regenerations before their body can't regenerate further?
In a show where "That's impossible." is often said as that thing is happening, I don't think there's much doubt that they'll work around whatever's been stated in the past.Linkified said:Right with this talk of regenerations and what not. Don't Timelords in general have a fixed number of regenerations before their body can't regenerate further?
Thomper said:In 'old' Who, it's been stated a few times that a Time Lord can regenerate 12 times, so they can have 13 lives. This is currently the 11th Doctor.
... but take all that with a grain of salt. The Master has apparently used up all of his regenerations a bunch of times, now, if I'm not mistaken. If Doctor Who is still a big hit by the time they're up to the 13th Doctor, there's always an easy to simply give him a fresh set of regenerations.
I recall an interview with Moffat in which he mentioned not being particularly fond of all the confusing Gallifrey/Time Lord backstory-stuff. Not entirely sure how accurate that is, but I don't expect to hear about the White Guardian or Matrix or Valeyard or anything. The Time War wiped out all that 'confusing' stuff: by the time they get to Doctor 14, they can easily just claim that with there no longer being any other Time Lords, there's unlimited regenerations for the Doctor.Raydeen said:I've always forseen some plotline where the Doctor dies but gets granted a whole recycle of regenerations by the White Guardian or something as his job isn't done yet. Or perhaps he absorbed the power of The Matrix and doesn't have a lifespan....they could just gloss over it and go to 14...15...16 ect with just a throwaway line and not make a big deal out of it. Wonder how they do with the Valeyard?
Linkified said:Right with this talk of regenerations and what not. Don't Timelords in general have a fixed number of regenerations before their body can't regenerate further?
DieNgamers said:Hey there! I just started watching Doctor Who last week and already arrived at season 4.
DieNgamers said:I'm at the second episode with theshadows...Man, it's so scary, funny and awesome at the same time!library and the
Yeah, he also did the episodes with the "are you my mum" kid, the other one with the strange clockwork guys and "blink", right? I already can't wait.Keyser Soze said:That writer is the guy that is in-charge of the whole show now... hooray!
I liked every episode with the Daleks...That said: I liked every episode except maybe the strange filler one with that blonde guy from Band of Brothers (?) telling the story.Power of the Daleks is great.
I don't get how the Doctor lived for 850ish years without using a single regeneration then burnt through 10 in half a century. Surely he'd start to slow down after that. Might want to stop wasting them saving Bernard Cribbins.Thomper said:In 'old' Who, it's been stated a few times that a Time Lord can regenerate 12 times, so they can have 13 lives. This is currently the 11th Doctor.
... but take all that with a grain of salt. The Master has apparently used up all of his regenerations a bunch of times, now, if I'm not mistaken. If Doctor Who is still a big hit by the time they're up to the 13th Doctor, there's always an easy to simply give him a fresh set of regenerations.
DieNgamers said:I liked every episode with the Daleks...That said: I liked every episode except maybe the strange filler one with that blonde guy from Band of Brothers (?) telling the story.
RedShift said:I don't get how the Doctor lived for 850ish years without using a single regeneration then burnt through 10 in half a century. Surely he'd start to slow down after that. Might want to stop wasting them saving Bernard Cribbins.
DieNgamers said:I liked every episode with the Daleks...That said: I liked every episode except maybe the strange filler one with that blonde guy from Band of Brothers (?) telling the story.
That's what I thought, too, so I looked it up, and... the first Doctor lived to be about 450 years old, apparently. :lol Details on Doctor's age, here: http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/The_Doctor's_ageRedShift said:I don't get how the Doctor lived for 850ish years without using a single regeneration then burnt through 10 in half a century. Surely he'd start to slow down after that. Might want to stop wasting them saving Bernard Cribbins.
Yes, I liked that one. :lol Wasn't revolutionary or anything but still entertaining.infiniteloop said:You liked the one about the little girl who could trap people in her drawings? If you can sit through that, you can enjoy any Doctor Who.
Mama Robotnik said:Love and Mosters is so bloody awful. Its by far and away the worst episode in the forty-year-history of the show.
Dr Zhivago said:The only Time Lord I'd like to see again is the Meddling Monk. In fact, he's probably making the cracks. Along with the Myrka.
...
Alphahawk said:While it would be awesome for the time lords to be creating the cracks I kinda doubt that's what's going on.
In America BBC America aired a special entitled "Dr Who the ultamate Guide" The special was intended to catch new viewers up, they spent a good portion explaining the reoccuring villans appearing this year (Daeleks. Cybermen and Weaping Angels) notably absent was The Master.Given the ending "The End of Time" I find it highly unlikely that the Time Lords would appear without the Master
Mama Robotnik said:Love and Mosters is so bloody awful. Its by far and away the worst episode in the forty-year-history of the show.
Aaaah! I knew I've seen her before! Thing is, even in most of the (not very common) filler episodes there's still the doctor so I can enjoy them.DrForester said:The girlfriend in that episode creeps me out to no end after seeing her play a 15 year old in 2 of the Harry Potter films while she's 40 years old.
DieNgamers said:Aaaah! I knew I've seen her before! Thing is, even in most of the (not very common) filler episodes there's still the doctor so I can enjoy them.![]()
DieNgamers said:Hey there! I just started watching Doctor Who last week and already arrived at season 4. Most entertaining and addicting series ever? Man, it must be close! The first one may still be my favourite but Tennant is just as good!
I'm at the second episode with theshadows...Man, it's so scary, funny and awesome at the same time!library and the
It'd be better if it was Susan but seeing as how RTD wrote the episode then it's more likely it'd be something that would make the least possible sense.DrForester said:The girlfriend in that episode creeps me out to no end after seeing her play a 15 year old in 2 of the Harry Potter films while she's 40 years old.
Few episodes behind, but figure I'll ask. Have they addressed who the Woman from The End of Time that The Doctor (and others) see was? Or is it still unaddressed/open to interpretation (I've heard people say it's his Mother, others that it's Susan)
Raydeen said:I've always forseen some plotline where the Doctor dies but gets granted a whole recycle of regenerations by the White Guardian or something as his job isn't done yet. Or perhaps he absorbed the power of The Matrix and doesn't have a lifespan....they could just gloss over it and go to 14...15...16 ect with just a throwaway line and not make a big deal out of it. Wonder how they do with the Valeyard?
DieNgamers said:Aaaah! I knew I've seen her before! Thing is, even in most of the (not very common) filler episodes there's still the doctor so I can enjoy them.![]()
mclem said:The idea I liked was to suggest that there was some sort of monster who 'eats regenerations', and when the Doctor defeats it, he gets all the regenerations it had left - and he doesn't know how many there were.
A thought about the Valeyard:
Didn't Trial of a Timelord take place on Gallifrey? That's now time-locked? How can the future doctor go back to there?
mclem said:Always bear this in mind:
Blink was a filler episode.
So was Midnight, but you've got that to look forward to yet.
Blader5489 said:Midnight was unbelievably good, because it was a low-budget RTD-penned episode.
Regulus Tera said:Fixed that for you.
Blader5489 said:Just because it was simpler than the big budget episodes doesn't it make any easier to write. It takes real talent to create something compelling and dramatic out of a one room scenario like that. An episode like that could easily be extremely boring.
I feel like I'm the only person who really enjoyed "Love and Monsters".Mama Robotnik said:Love and Mosters is so bloody awful. Its by far and away the worst episode in the forty-year-history of the show.
ninj4junpei said:I'm sure that this has been mentioned before, but I think there is a scene from the finale in The Eleventh Hour. I'm referring to the scene where it shows 7 year old Amy sitting outside and then she hears the Tardis. I'm certain that's when The Doctor comes to tell her whatever it is that she is supposed to remember.
Blader5489 said:Just because it was simpler than the big budget episodes doesn't it make any easier to write. It takes real talent to create something compelling and dramatic out of a one room scenario like that. An episode like that could easily be extremely boring.
ninj4junpei said:I feel like I'm the only person who really enjoyed "Love and Monsters".
It's always the same with series and that's why I'll probably wait for the new DVD set to come out...Will be a long wait but well. I can't stand week to week watching, to be honest. However, I'm not the person who thinks too much about an episode after watching it. If I only had the chance to watch them week to week I'd probably lose interest. Sometimes it's like watching a big episode movie but with big gabs this of course wouldn't be the case anymore.Dead Man Typing said:Be careful, I was like you, I'd seen one or two episodes in the past, then got a loan of all the DVD's of "new Who" and watched them in rapid succession. It's definitely a great way to watch the show, as you don't spend a week focusing on plot-holes or weak episodes, only the best bits and cool moments stand out and carry over as you marathon into the next episode.
The reason I say be careful, is that once you catch up to the new series and start watching week-to-week, your expectations and sense of entitlement will start to inflate to ridiculous proportions. You'll start to over-think scenarios and rules, characters and plot points, and the 45 minutes each week just isn't enough to satisfy the appetite you've developed through the DVD's. The show may be better now than it's ever been, but my perception of it, is to criticise almost all aspects, even when I see good things now, the bad stay with my just as much. Which wasn't the case when watching on DVD.
Just be aware of this warning when you start on series 5, which is the first season I've watched week-to-week. I loved every episode of series 1-4, even the one's everyone here says they hate.
Android18a said:As for the regeneration thing, they should just not mention it until Doctor 13 "dies", expecting to not regenerate at all. When he wakes up as a new man, he's just like "hm. maybe I mis-counted?" and shrug it off until the show is cancelled again in 2037.
Oh no you didn't... I'm throwing both you and your friend Sam into the crack.Regulus Tera said:Respectfully disagree on the grounds that Fear Her and The Doctor's Daughter exist.
Also, Time and the Rani.
Dr Zhivago said:I can't believe people are spoiler-tagging Trail of a Time Lord. :lol Anyway, it was set on a funky space station, the (rather nice) FX shot of which used up nearly the entire budget for the series.