funkmastergeneral
Banned
So I've been trying to get into shape this spring, started running last week and eating shit like salad and granola. Woke up this morning and had a root beer and 3 slices of cold pizza. Dammit food is just so damn tempting
funkmastergeneral said:So I've been trying to get into shape this spring, started running last week and eating shit like salad and granola. Woke up this morning and had a root beer and 3 slices of cold pizza. Dammit food is just so damn tempting
Like Snrub said, you have to give your body the fuel it needs--it can't keep itself running if you're exercising hard and only giving it rabbit food. You do need to eat lettuce, but you need lean meat, too.funkmastergeneral said:So I've been trying to get into shape this spring, started running last week and eating shit like salad and granola. Woke up this morning and had a root beer and 3 slices of cold pizza. Dammit food is just so damn tempting
Captain Glanton said:This link is to one of my favorite articles, ever. Everyone should read it.I wish I'd thought of linking to it here.
Also, just to emphasize, no one who knows fitness stuff minds being asked to help out people who don't know but are willing to work hard to learn. We do mind being asked to do the work others won't do for themselves.
Davedough said:Please clarify something for me. Between you and Slo, what did I say that in any way shape or form suggested that I'm trying to get something for nothing and make you guys do work for me, or for that matter I'm unmotivated and unwilling to participate in a workout regiment? I simply asked for an opinion of a fitness program. Is asking for an opinion too much to ask for people who've already achieved their health nirvana? I came here hoping that I could further the motivation I have, and get some idea of what I can do but instead was immediately hit with abrasiveness and malcontent. WTF? I've already begun doing some cardio exercises and I have a punching bag in my garage that I've been using to keep my heartrate up. I was merely asking for an opinion on something a bit more structured so I have some kind of clue of what I'm doing to get in shape. You people assume too much, but I guess its way too much to ask "the internet" to drop their stigmas and actually care about anyone but themselves.
If I said something in my post thats to the contrary and I missed it, then its news to me. But if asking for a bit of assistance is too much trouble, then I wont soil your precious thread.
Davedough said:I'll be perfectly honest, I'm not motivated enough to glance through 28 pages of this, but let me ask this and I apologize if it's been covered in depth already.
I want to know some of your opinions from people who know about fitness on the DVDs for the Power 90 series by Tony Horton. A friend of mine gave me his copies and said he never got around to using them and since I dont think I'm physically ready for the P90X system, I think the Power 90 is right up my alley.
I'm 6'3" and 220lbs. I'm only slightly overweight, but greatly out of shape. What are some of your opinions on this workout routine for someone who doesn't have the time or money to attend a gym just yet?
I'm not in the fitness industry at all. I'm an English teacher. I do the thread because people want help, and I put a lot of time into giving it to them, as do a few other regular contributors in here. That's fine with me; I'm glad to do it. But it's not like I get something out of it.You people assume too much, but I guess its way too much to ask "the internet" to drop their stigmas and actually care about anyone but themselves.
Shoho said:How much fat a day can a person get if they want to loose weight?
I love stuff like peanuts, almonds, cashew and that sort of stuff...
They contain natural fat that is good for the body, and plenty of protein. Is this something to avoid, or what?
Also... someone in this thread suggested fruits as a good "diet thing". But how bad is fruits that contain natural fruit sugar(is that fruktose or something?)?
I mean... how bad is apples, apple juice, orange, orange juice, water melon, peaches, strawberry, raisins, and all that sort of stuff?
If its "natural" or "ecological" how much better is it?
I saw these crackers the other day that said that they contained that brown raw sugar.. what is it called? sugar cane? natural healthy sugar?
But is that a wrong assumption? sugar is sugar, no matter if it comes from nature or if its made by man?
Shoho said:Has anyone seen this? some dude.. hes a vegan or something says protein is not the source of getting muscle..: http://youtube.com/watch?v=ae-dlHOmwk4
he seems quite convicing, but I dont know this stuff... what do u guys think?
Futureman said:What's healthier, chicken fried rice or white rice? I know that brown rice is better than white rice, but would white be better than chicken fried? I assume chicken fried rice is insanely high in sodium.
Mr. Snrub said:Yeah, he looks like he has the size and strength to prove it.
Also, PLEASE be aware of the old adage "the exception and not the rule". Look at what works on the masses.
Amino acids are VERY important because they help with the entire muscle synthesis/breakdown process. But come on...just look at him.
Protein is not an "empty" nutrient the way he makes it sound.
As a general note, I will add that some bodybuilders take the "chicken and rice" dinner too far. It's a great meal, but if you're eating that every night you're missing out on some key nutrients. I try to mix up my "chicken + rice" with "chicken + frozen vegetables" meals.Struct09 said:The calories stack up pretty quickly in fried rice. If you can watch your portions, you're fine. I'd personally stick to the white rice.
Also, the difference between brown and white rice is pretty small. The difference in one serving of each is that the brown rice contains about 1g of fiber and a few grams of protein. Brown rice is technically better nutritionally, but white rice is nothing to fear.
Shoho said:Has anyone seen this? some dude.. hes a vegan or something says protein is not the source of getting muscle..: http://youtube.com/watch?v=ae-dlHOmwk4
Mr. Snrub said:Glanton,
Interesting bit about "tone"/tonus from Rippetoe's Practical Programming (p.60). Tone is the electrophysiological phenomenon, a measure of ionic flow across the muscle membrance. In general, compare the muscles of those who do low intensity (their muscles will generally be soft/"relaxed") to those who do high intensity work. I forget the EXACT spectrum he gives, but its something like marathon runner>sprinter>cyclist>olympic weightlifter in terms of how hard their muscles are, at rest. Tone, in a functional sense (not just low bodyfat), is the measure of a muscle's readiness to perform anaerobic activity. I'll try to get more info when I get home, if anyone wants quotes on this.
Might want to add a section regarding equipment and chalk, as well.
Mr.City said:I've recently found out during a visit to the chiropracter that my pelvis is uneven and cause one leg to be shorter than the other. I've always noticed weight being place more on one leg more than the other during my squats.
My question is if I should to unilaterial leg exercises exclusively. Single-leg squats make me a bit nervous considering I don't have the best balance in the world.
BlueTsunami said:I did some heavy (to me) Squats yesterday. I used the fixed machine since I need to get a belt but I worked out my whole back thigh area and my glutes real well. I love the feeling you get when your pushing up, your whole body tenses. After 12 Reps of that you definitely get some sort of high :lol
MrToughPants said:Just put an extra in-sole in one of your shoes.
Anyone seen this training video? Venceslas Dabaya (151lbs) doing 5x 440 lbs front squats that's almost three times his bodyweight :lol
Mr. Snrub said:Hey Blue,
Any reason why you need a belt for free weight squats? They're really not necessary unless you have a debilitating injury or are on a max attempt. Embrace free weight squats--the "high" is much better.
Mr. Snrub said:Glanton,
Interesting bit about "tone"/tonus from Rippetoe's Practical Programming (p.60). Tone is the electrophysiological phenomenon, a measure of ionic flow across the muscle membrance. In general, compare the muscles of those who do low intensity (their muscles will generally be soft/"relaxed") to those who do high intensity work. I forget the EXACT spectrum he gives, but its something like marathon runner>sprinter>cyclist>olympic weightlifter in terms of how hard their muscles are, at rest. Tone, in a functional sense (not just low bodyfat), is the measure of a muscle's readiness to perform anaerobic activity. I'll try to get more info when I get home, if anyone wants quotes on this.
Might want to add a section regarding equipment and chalk, as well.
Captain Glanton said:http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=XhfBEU0GlbE
Friend of mine front squatting.
Edit: I'm NOT the fatass in the background. I wasn't there that day.
Captain Glanton said:http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=XhfBEU0GlbE
Friend of mine front squatting.
Edit: I'm NOT the fatass in the background. I wasn't there that day.
Not anymore!MrToughPants said:Layne is so much bigger then when I first saw one of his pictures, I think it was in 2002 when I got the internet. :lol
Mr. Snrub said:Admitting your problem is the first step, Glant.
Struct09 said:It's spelled "lose". When people say "loose weight" it bugs me
Grammar nazism aside, there is no set amount of fat per day that you're "allowed". Dietary fat doesn't hinder weight loss, but excess calories from fat (or carbs, or protein) will. Nuts are a great source of dietary fat, and including something like a handful of almonds is good for any healthy diet. Same concept applies to fruit.
When trying to lose weight, your biggest concern should be that the calories you take in are less than the calories you expend. That being said, keeping balance between fat, carbohydrates, and protein is a good idea to ensure your diet is healthy. You could eat "clean" food 100% of the time and still have a crappy diet - an example being if your diet was entirely chicken breasts.
Ace 8095 said:For all those who have so much trouble losing weight, I would like to introduce you to my problem. Gaining weight for a 158 pound 18 year old is hard. I eat over 3000 calories a day, perform no cardio other than a few warm-up exercises before lifting, and drink at least a half gallon of milk a day. I sleep 8 to 9 hours a night, lift 4 times a week performing cleans, presses, squats, and dead lifts, and progress is still slow. But for all those who think it's not worth it, you're wrong.
Lifting weights, eating ALOT of good food, and getting enough sleep is amazing. Since I started lifting weights last November I feel better, look better, and am happier than ever before. There is nothing quite like the feeling of accomplishment in knowing that today I lifted as hard as I could, ate as much good food as I could, and made sure to get enough sleep. It's worth much more that all the time, money, and effort it takes.
mr stroke said:whats better for you in the long run?
Sugar or Splenda?
I am having an arguement with the wife about what I should be putting in my coffee. She says I am better off with the sugar because its "natural" and I will burn off the calories from my daily workouts, but I say the Splenda because it has zero calories. She thinks Splenda causes cancer and is naturaly bad for your body because of the chemicals it contains??
beelzebozo said:everything causes cancer
MrToughPants said:I got a great deal here at IGA they had boneless chicken breasts @ $6.10/kg so I bought $40 worth. Two days prior they had it listed at $13/kg!! and I bought about $60 worth then.
My diet looks like this right now
1-2lbs of chicken + salad/veggies
2 cans of tuna
500ml cottage cheese
1-2L milk
5-6 scrambled eggs
bunch of fruits
alot of baked potatoes, a 50lb bag is $8 here :lol
sometimes I throw in some salmon or whatever was cooked for dinner
The "splenda causes cancer" thing is a myth. Consume with pride, friend.mr stroke said:whats better for you in the long run?
Sugar or Splenda?
I am having an arguement with the wife about what I should be putting in my coffee. She says I am better off with the sugar because its "natural" and I will burn off the calories from my daily workouts, but I say the Splenda because it has zero calories. She thinks Splenda causes cancer and is naturaly bad for your body because of the chemicals it contains??
mr stroke said:whats better for you in the long run?
Sugar or Splenda?
Soka said:I envy those of you that live in a place where you can cook your own food. Living in a dorm makes it quite a bit harder for me to eat what I'd like to be eating, since I can't really cook any of it myself.
That is a nice price for chicken!
MrToughPants said:The freezer is full of chicken I should probably slow down on it though. I'm just used to eating so much fish and now I turn to chicken
Baked Potatoes + chicken = HEAVEN
teh_pwn said:I disagree with the bolded. Your body doesn't whip out a calculator at the end of the day and tally up calories and instantaneously add fat to your body if you're in excess and remove it if you consumed too little.
While mathematically it is true that calories out has to be higher than calories in, it doesn't take into account the motives for breaking from a diet nor does it consider the long term effects on the metabolism.
If you were to eat nothing but fat, protein, and fiber all day, you would lose body fat each day. You simply cannot overeat when these macronutrients are alone, and it is the premise of the Atkins diet.
Fat is very calorie dense, yes, but your body is unable to digest it quickly enough to create a caloric surplus when there isn't any carbs along with it. Protein is less calorie dense but follows the same idea. It's simply too difficult to digest to create those calorie bursts that warrant body fat storage. Protein also takes more energy to digest, so your metabolism increases if you ate 100 calories of protein versus 100 calories of carbs.
So try all you want, but without carbs, you simply won't be hungry enough to overeat. If anything, you'll under eat.
When you add carbs, especially fiberless refined carbs like flour, to fat, everything changes. Oil + flour/sugar is the ultimate obesity formula. Your body will digest this almost instantly, storing the excess energy as body fat. When digestion is over, you'll get hungry again. The lack of protein starves muscles and causes the body to cannibalize itself to get the protein it needs. Lost muscle tissue reduces your metabolism.