GCQuinton said:New post over at the EA Sports blog on the Dynasty Wire and StoryBuilder features. As an old user of Dynasty Central in the PS2/Xbox days I'm loving all of this.
http://ncaafootball.easports.com/blog.action?blogId=DynastyWire
Confirmation that the dynasty limit is set at 12 again?DMczaf said:"As I said earlier, Dynasty Wire is your archive for every human game played in the Dynasty. If you have a 12 man Dynasty, with a 13 game a year schedule, and every game has 15 highlights saved, for all 60 years of a Dynasty you would have 140,400 highlights at your fingertips when going to create a story. "
BigAT said:Confirmation that the dynasty limit is set at 12 again?
Pretty much every starter on Alabama is over 90. Half the Sub's are too.Striker said:I figured it is 12, and they confirm it by the section listings in the demo.
Looking through Ohio U. and PITT roster's now. Accidentally cilcked on OSU and saw Pryor was a 94. :lol :\
Lonestar said:Pretty much every starter on Alabama is over 90. Half the Sub's are too.
Though, who is #2 MLB. I don't know a #2 MLB
DMczaf said:"As I said earlier, Dynasty Wire is your archive for every human game played in the Dynasty. If you have a 12 man Dynasty, with a 13 game a year schedule, and every game has 15 highlights saved, for all 60 years of a Dynasty you would have 140,400 highlights at your fingertips when going to create a story. "
Lonestar said:Seems wierd for Tana to be #2, but then again, didn't see him hit the field last year. He is a 4 star or 5 star, from memory.
Alabama might be too strong for the game. I'm hearing 97 rated overall, and from seeing the roster, I can see that.
How about neither of us play as Alabama!
Menelaus said:Bama at 99/99/99
What a freaking joke.
Captured before you get a chance to change it. We all know what you meant.Lonestar said::lol
While their Overall should be better than anyone elses, it should be straight 99's
BigAT said:I'd prefer one of the two "career" choices. Either #2 or #3 works for me.
I'll be going with Rutgers.
Captured before you get a chance to change it. We all know what you meant.
Azwethinkweiz said:Noooo, Clemson is a 4* team this year.
DMczaf said:UNLV 2 stars?
How the fuck did we get that extra star?!
FrenchMovieTheme said:9th year seniors johnson & johnson is how!
LukeSmith said:Why in the fuck is Michigan 5* - there's no prestige there
...Wikipedia said:* Highest all-time winning percentage in NCAA Division I-A football history (.737)
* Most all-time wins in NCAA Division I-A football history (877)
* The most winning seasons (110)
* The most undefeated seasons in Division I-A football (25)
* One of only three schools with a winning record against every Division I-A conference
Lonestar said:Closed Dynasty
CLOSED!
*barring a possible playoff to use Alabama*
Seriously, a closed Dynasty needs to be on something other than "stars", because Arkansas is a 90 rated 3 star team...
Azwethinkweiz said:Just do no teams in the top 25.
I believe that's what "preliminary" means.Lonestar said:UGA rated 90 unrated :lol
I think I saw somewhere a post about the teambuilder website not being fully correct with the final results. Same could be said for that video of the teams @ E3.
GCQuinton said:I believe that's what "preliminary" means.
The reason I had it at three stars last year was to give people the chance to take over teams on the cusp of potentially being powerhouses. If you guys really wanna go closed/career, I can make it two stars instead of three. That would solve the ratings talk quick.
GCQuinton said:I can make it two stars instead of three. That would solve the ratings talk quick.
Team Prestige - Team Name - Overall - Offense - Defense
1 Arkansas ST 66-69-68
1 Army 66-69-68
1 E Michigan 60-60-63
1 FAU 65-69-64
1 FIU 65-66-67
1 Idaho 69-72-69
1 Kent St 65-69-66
1 Mid Tenn St 75-78-77
1 New Mexico St 64-66-64
1 North Texas 69-72-69
1 San Jose St 62-64-66
1 Tulane 68-69-70
1 UAB 76-76-78
1 UL Lafayette 71-75-70
1 UL Monroe 64-69-64
1 Utah State 66-71-67
1 Western Kentucky 60-65-60
1 Western Michigan 71-75-70
1 San Diego ST 72-76-72
2 Akron 64-65-67
2 Ball St 64-66-64
2 Bowling Green 66-69-68
2 Buffalo 66-69-69
2 Duke 78-80-78
2 Indiana 80-87-77
2 Iowa St 83-86-81
2 Louisiana Tech 69-75-68
2 Marshall 78-80-78
2 Memphis 73-78-73
2 Miami U 65-66-69
2 Nevada 79-86-84
2 New Mexico 68-68-73
2 Northern ILL 73-75-75
2 Ohio 71-75-70
2 Rice 64-69-66
2 SMU 78-79-78
2 Temple 73-78-73
2 Toledo 71-75-70
2 Troy 75-80-73
2 UNLV 71-75-70
2 UTEP 73-82-69
2 Vandy 82-85-81
2 WSU 79-83-77
2 Wyoming 72-69-77
2 Baylor 82-86-79
2 UNLV 71-75-70
3 AF 75-78-74
3 Arkansas 90-96-85
3 BC 87-89-88
3 CAL 87-90-88
3 Central Michigan 76-75-79
3 Colorado 82-81-83
3 Colorado ST 76-80-77
3 Connecuticut 79-83-78
3 ECU 78-83-75
3 Houston 80-89-74
3 Kentucky 82-85-81
3 KU 82-82-83
3 Louisville 78-83-77
3 Michigan St 86-89-85
3 Miss St 86-83-89
3 Navy 79-85-77
3 NC St 80-86-78
3 Northwestern 82-83-84
3 Ole Miss 87-90-88
3 Purdue 83-86-83
3 Rutgers 85-89-84
3 SO Miss 78-83-77
3 South Carolina 85-86-85
3 Syracuse 78-80-79
3 Texas Tech 87-93-83
3 Tulsa 78-83-75
3 UCF 83-83-84
3 USF 79-83-79
3 UW 89-93-88
3 Virgina 80-79-84
3 WF 83-85-84
3 Arizona 83-90-80
3 CAL 87-90-88
3 Fresno ST 78-82-75
3 Hawaii 73-76-73
3 ILL 78-79-79
3 KSU 80-83-80
3 Maryland 82-85-81
3 Minnesota 85-87-85
3 Stanford 90-92-89
4 ASU 85-82-89
4 BYU 86-87-85
4 GTech 89-90-89
4 OK St 89-92-88
4 Pitt 89-92-88
4 TCU 90-96-88
4 Texas A&M 89-93-85
4 UCLA 80-85-80
4 Utah 86-90-85
4 Cincy 85-92-81
4 CLEM 89-90-90
4 Iowa 89-92-89
4 Missouri 85-90-83
4 North Carolina 92-87-95
4 Oregon State 89-92-88
4 TCU 90-76-88
4 UCLA 80-85-80
4 WISC 92-96-89
5 Auburn 87-89-88
5 Boise St 93-97-90
5 Georgia 90-93-88
5 Miami 92-94-91
5 Nebraska 90-92-90
5 Oregon 90-93-89
5 Tenn 86-86-88
5 VT 90-96-88
5 WV 89-92-88
5 FSU 89-93-85
6 Alabama 99-99-99
6 Florida 92-92-92
6 LSU 92-92-92
6 Oklahoma 94-96-92
6 PSU 92-94-90
6 Texas 93-94-92
6 OSU 96-97-95
6 USC 92-94-91
6 MICH 87-89-86
6 Notre Dame 86-90-85
Big Papa Husker said:The online dynasty updates sound so amazing. I have been wanting something like that since the old PS2 versions. Hopefully you can export all the info out as a spreadsheet or something in case they take down the servers in a year or whatever.... or they allow you to continue the same dynasty in the next version of NCAA.
Lonestar said:I'd move for create a conference-ish. Or at least make sure that there isn't a conference with only 1-3 people in it. Say at least 6 per conference, if not the full 12.
I'd also like either Texas Tech or Miss. State
That only excludes like 3 teams. I'm sure people disagree with me but I wouldnt mind seeing the rating cap lower. 85-87GCQuinton said:From this point forward, teams you pick must have at the most three stars of prestige with an overall rating no higher than 89.
KanZolo said:That only excludes like 3 teams. I'm sure people disagree with me but I wouldnt mind seeing the rating cap lower. 85-87
FrenchMovieTheme said:dang lots of interest! we might have to split up the dynasties :/