Windle Poons
Made a crappy phPBB forum once ... once.
It's not the winning its taking part that counts.Me 24 hours after posting my result:
![]()
It's not the winning its taking part that counts.Me 24 hours after posting my result:
![]()
Yeah pure stock with a Best Buy prebuiltWas that at stock? I've managed to get into the 34,000's GPU score with overclocking but without upping the power limit. I haven't tested with higher power limits yet.
Damn nice score
I will just OC and adjust pbo and I’m sure I can get close or moreNot impressed by any of the 5090 scores, exceptanalog_future
You know.....I look at these scores and think perhaps I should upgrade my CPU, but then I go and check out game benchmarks and CPU doesn't have nearly as much impact as these Timespy scores suggest. Anyone else noticed this?
Especially at higher resolutions its all about the GPUYou know.....I look at these scores and think perhaps I should upgrade my CPU, but then I go and check out game benchmarks and CPU doesn't have nearly as much impact as these Timespy scores suggest. Anyone else noticed this?
Damn nice score
Nice temps as well. Probably lots of headroom in that setup.
analog_future what's your case and cooling setup like?
My 9950X3D arrive today it’s out for delivery not that it’s gonna change my scoreScores updated, we have a new leader inanalog_future .
![]()
Yeh the CPU has an impact in timespy because the last section of the test is running only on the CPU I believe. It's also because it's a 1080p test, so CPU bottlenecks can have a huge impact.
With that said though, a GPU overclock/undervolt can often brute force a result towards the top of the charts. So the first port of call should always be looking at ways to optimise your current hardware before starting to throw money at the problem.
Although having said that, I'm sureOverHeat will prove me wrong by throwing an additional $1000 at his machine and end up topping the charts
![]()
Default settings is free.I'm not paying £7 to get my epeen ridiculed, nice try![]()
Yeah his temps are great.Nice temps as well. Probably lots of headroom in that setup.
analog_future what's your case and cooling setup like?
I'm not paying £7 to get my epeen ridiculed, nice try![]()
£29.50
£7.37
Nah, I'm good.
Steel Nomad should be our bench.
Use the free version, the benchmark being used here is available there (HRK69 this also applies to you):
I'll update the OP with the direct link to this so it's more clear.
No it shouldn't. This is a test for the total system, not just the GPU. There's a reason why timespy is still the benchmark of choice across the industry.
Does it work with the demo?Downloadable Content
This content requires the base application 3DMark on Steam in order to run.
3DMark Time Spy benchmark
Before you can add this product to your Steam account, you must own the base product.
Does it work with the demo?
Especially at higher resolutions its all about the GPU
Your CPU is kick ass and would only benefit you if you wanted to game at 1080 and ultra high frame rates
Yeah his temps are great.
Our CPU temps are almost identical but my GPU temp is slightly higher
![]()
![]()
That is a decent jump and for this test at least a large difference between our CPUs but obviously wouldn't see that in real world gaming as looking at places like Gamers Nexus testing your CPU vs my 9800X3D frames are much closer.Yeah....if I was going for top end frames and lower rez then I'd definitely upgrade. Thing I find interesting here though is that 3dmark is putting a heavy emphasis on CPU cores. In Time Spy Extreme, which benchmarks in 4k,winjer 's 5800x3d and 9070 had a better overall score than my 7600x3d and 9080 XT. Those two additional CPU scores are having a pretty large impact.
winjer -10923 https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/127767086
me - 10483 https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/127972376?
Yeah my case has 3 fans at the bottom feeding directly into the GPU with fresh air and a 360 MM rad exhausting out the top and 2 fans exhausting out the rearMakes sense since I've got the hot air from my case being pushed through my radiator.
With water cooling at least, it's all just a balance of what you want to keep cooler. You're either intaking cold air into the CPU radiator and pushing the hot air into the case, or pulling the hot air produced by the GPU and other components out through the radiator. You'll end up with either a warmer CPU or a warmer GPU.
LEAGUE TABLE:
analog_future - TimeSpy - 38,307 - epeen rating
- @Kilau - Timespy - 36,728
OverHeat - Timespy - 36,641
- T Three - Timespy - 34,028
Chiggs - Time Spy - 33,193
- @xenosys - Timespy - 32,222
- @BennyBlanco - Timespy - 31,804
- @baphomet - Timespy - 29,212
Windle Poons - Screenshot - 28,386
HeisenbergFX4 - screenshot - 28,172
GHG - Timespy - 27,781
- M moogman - Timespy - 26,886
dispensergoinup - Time Spy - 25,924
- @Akuji - link - 25,626
winjer - Timespy - 24,718
GHG - Timespy - 24,345
- @HeWhoWalks - TimeSpy - 22,591
Topher - Timespy - 22,119
Yep standardwe're doing the standard time spy?
i done 4K oops
Looks like your DDR4 vs my DDR5 is that 1500 point difference. We both have a 4070.keefged4 - http://www.3dmark.com/spy/54104410 - 16148
It's not the size that matters, It's what you do with it or something like that
* score is actually 29,646mines seems a bit low but it's undervolted and FE design. whatever. also my driver version isn't valid for some reason. you can see the version in the corner
Makoto-Yuki screenshot 35234
Something is wrongmines seems a bit low but it's undervolted and FE design. whatever. also my driver version isn't valid for some reason. you can see the version in the corner
Makoto-Yuki screenshot 35234
i'm an idiot* score is actually 29,646
i don't knowSomething is wrong
Have kinda been my though through this thread, are everyone running with the exact same settings/resolution etc etc when running the benchmark?Default settings is free.
wtf i see what you mean.Something is wrong