yankeeforever2
Member
If Hilary gets the democratic vote.....I hope we have a republican for 4 more years!
No; by looking at this thread obviously the far-left Dems are more to blame.Father_Brain said:Are you seriously implying that both parties are equally to blame for the current situation in Washington?
StoOgE said:obama cant compete on super tuesday. he needed a 4 state k.o. beforehand.
TheKingsCrown said:This is not fucking true and you know it. The people in the Republican camp are riddled with crazies. And Hillary may be more of the same Clinton-era-ness that was annoying and ridiculous, but at least she isn't fucking crazy. She doesn't want to quarantine AIDS patients, or stay at war in a country just for the sake of it, rather than for creating stability, or stop large groups of people from getting equal rights under the law. And most importantly she is a woman. At the end of the day, she can jiggle her breasts and repair possibly the most damage that has been done to our image since the country was created.
If you want radical change you have to wait until the country is stable enough to survive it. This country is in no way stable. Its currency is going down the shitter and its economy might go with it, its political pull is approaching zero in the world, and its debt is absolutely ridiculous. Our lives are getting harder. Ridiculously fucking rapid change makes things harder, especially for the unprotected. Its a vicious product of capitalism especially. So how about we stabilize our country, a country riddled and divided by 9/11 before we try to destroy everything we have become?
I agree with you that Washington is a mess, the country's state was far from perfect before 9/11, but there are things we need back from that era before we can change things rapidly, ASSUMING that an Obama president would even change things.
They don't get delegates.kbear said:Why don't they matter? I'm not really familiar with this
Mifune said:Excellent reasoning.
Zabka said:Ugh...women.
kbear said:Why don't they matter? I'm not really familiar with this
APF said:No; by looking at this thread obviously the far-left Dems are more to blame.
Absinthe said:Doesn't matter one iota. His oratory skills aren't going to sway cemented people.
tetsuoxb said:I'll take the chance to vote against Hillary any day.
TheKingsCrown said:This is not fucking true and you know it. The people in the Republican camp are riddled with crazies. And Hillary may be more of the same Clinton-era-ness that was annoying and ridiculous, but at least she isn't fucking crazy. She doesn't want to quarantine AIDS patients, or stay at war in a country just for the sake of it, rather than for creating stability, or stop large groups of people from getting equal rights under the law. And most importantly she is a woman. At the end of the day, she can jiggle her breasts and repair possibly the most damage that has been done to our image since the country was created.
RubxQub said:Lou Dobbs can fuck himself.
Posts like this--of which there are *many* in this thread--show there's more to my tongue-in-cheek comments about anti-Hillary fanboyism having roots in misogyny.Mii said:I currently have a vision of Hillary crying in front of Ahmadinejad and then having make up sex.
Help me. I can't take this for 8 years.
Y2Kev said:I would like to hear more on this.
Mine was Bush/Gore...how do you think I feel?Zozz said:Dude I just won't vote, I can't believe this bitch is fucking up my first election so badly.
RubxQub said:Mine was Bush/Gore
Father_Brain said:Exactly. This is why Amir0x and other similarly minded Obama supporters are, IMO, either insane or just stupid. There was not a single fact about either candidate in his post - just a bunch of vague assertions, and a ludicrous suggestion that both parties are equally to blame for the political status quo.
ezrarh said:I become eligible to vote and this is what I get? No point in showing up if Hilary gets the nomination.
APF said:Posts like this--of which there are *many* in this thread--show there's more to my tongue-in-cheek comments about anti-Hillary fanboyism having roots in misogyny.
Really as if Obama isn't as polarizing as Hillary for his youth and race as well?Father_Brain said:I also suspect that the oft-reiterated claims of Clinton's unelectability are greatly exaggerated, but it's impossible to prove that.
perfectchaos007 said:Well, at least Obama got the same amount of delegates as Clinton.
TheKingsCrown said:This is not fucking true and you know it. The people in the Republican camp are riddled with crazies. And Hillary may be more of the same Clinton-era-ness that was annoying and ridiculous, but at least she isn't fucking crazy. She doesn't want to quarantine AIDS patients, or stay at war in a country just for the sake of it rather than for creating stability, and she doesn't want to stop large groups of people from getting equal rights under the law. And most importantly she is a woman. At the end of the day, she can jiggle her breasts and repair [internationally] possibly the most damage that has been done to our image since the country was created.
If you want radical change you have to wait until the country is stable enough to survive it. This country is in no way stable. Its currency is going down the shitter and its economy might go with it, its political pull is approaching zero in the world, and its debt is absolutely ridiculous. Our lives are getting harder. Ridiculously fucking rapid change makes things harder, especially for the unprotected. Its a vicious product of capitalism especially. So how about we stabilize our country, a country riddled and divided by 9/11 before we try to destroy everything we have become?
I agree with you that Washington is a mess, the country's state was far from perfect before 9/11, but there are things we need back from that era before we can change things rapidly, ASSUMING that an Obama president would even change things.
APF said:Obama's actual record is strikingly-close to Hillary's, and as I mentioned before he's to the right of her on a few issues. Oh, but she doesn't have "hope" on her side!!
icarus-daedelus said:He apparently doesn't realize that he may very well be splitting the Obama crowd. Eh, I don't get it.
avatar299 said:What you don't understand is that she doesn't have anything locked up. Iowa proved she wasn't infallable and NH proves Obama hasn't convinced everyone yet, however he still had a far better showing in this primary compared to Hillary in Iowa.
it's to early to call anyone for either side. I seriously wonder how many of you know how the primaries work.
grandjedi6 said:They both bumped up their primary dates against the wishes of the Democrat National Committee. So they got blacklisted and get 0 delegates
MassiveAttack said:Great attitude.
Kusagari said:If Florida doesn't matter, why is Rudy banking everything on it?
ToxicAdam said:Well, here's their record on the 69 votes concerning Iraq (they agreed on 68 of them .. scroll all the way down for the votes). I will dig up more on their records on general policy issues (I would just assume they are all very similar .. except for issues where each candidate "ducked" the vote (sometimes for legitimate personal reasons .. other times for political ones.)
Grecco said:But hes the agent of change, brings change, super duper change, refreshing change loving change. chachachagangeesss.
Andy787 said:Who the fuck actually supports Hillary? Christ. :/
Tancredo? Duncan Hunter? I'd plug my nose and vote Hillary instead of them.Amir0x said:EVERYONE is better than Hillary.
AdmiralViscen said:Disenfranchisement is less important than tradition. Didn't know they actually went through with this.
APF said:Obama's actual record is strikingly-close to Hillary's, and as I mentioned before he's to the right of her on a few issues. Oh, but she doesn't have "hope" on her side!!