That's off topic (and will get buried in such fast moving thread).Souldriver said:You went from where to USA?
Let's leave it to a slower time.
That's off topic (and will get buried in such fast moving thread).Souldriver said:You went from where to USA?
avaya said:Like electoral college. States have delegates. Most delegates win.
kChichikov said:That's off topic (and will get buried in such fast moving thread).
Let's leave it to a slower time.
Thompson has a rival it seems.Y2kev said:McCain is boring as all hell. He has to be close to death.
It's not about the delegates, it's about the media bounce.Tamanon said:Oh yeah, Obamaniacs don't worry too much. At the end of the day it doesn't matter who wins, because each side sends delegates in proportion to who polled what. This close to call means maybe a 1 or 2 delegate difference.
We have had a bachelor President before (James Buchanan).X26 said:So are you allowed to run for prez if you're not married?
jamesinclair said:Why would Edwards drop out before Richardson?
Doesnt Edwards have a chance South Carolina? Isnt he from there?
We have had a bachelor President before (James Buchanan).
Because Richardson is running for Vice President and Edwards is running for President.jamesinclair said:Why would Edwards drop out before Richardson?
Doesnt Edwards have a chance South Carolina? Isnt he from there?
SRG01 said:Oh, as a Canadian observing this, I have one more question: what exactly determines who gets to be the democratic presidential nominee? Is it whoever wins the most primaries?
SRG01 said:How many delegates does NH have? If it's not that much, then Obama losing NH might not be that bad.
jamesinclair said:Why would Edwards drop out before Richardson?
Doesnt Edwards have a chance South Carolina? Isnt he from there?
SRG01 said:How many delegates does NH have? If it's not that much, then Obama losing NH might not be that bad.
What site are you looking at? I found the link to Politico a few pages back. It showed the gap narrow by a hundred or so, nothing major.v1cious said:whoah... the gap is decreasing. thi may be closer than we thought.
Possibly why we've never had one again. :lolXeke said:And he was by far one of the worst.
Don't you mean... Odrama?teruterubozu said:It isn't that bad.
The GAF Obamadrama is just silly. See? Another Obamaism!
sp0rsk said:He didn't win South Carolina last time did he?
scorcho said:'Mac is Back' has to be the most inauthentic campaign chant i've ever heard.
I think Edwards is from NC. And I think Obama pretty much as SC wrapped up.jamesinclair said:Why would Edwards drop out before Richardson?
Doesnt Edwards have a chance South Carolina? Isnt he from there?
Souldriver said:Thompson has a rival it seems.
RubxQub said:Don't you mean... Odrama?
avaya said:
I agree. He has southern appeal (being from NC), which is a huge factor as witnessed in the past couple elections.SuperBonk said:I feel bad for Edwards. I think he's definitely the least polarizing Democrat and has the best chance of winning the GE.
Farmboy said:That's some really bad speeching right there. Him having to look down constantly doesn't help either. Can't the guy afford a teleprompter?
JohnTinker said:
SRG01 said:How many delegates does NH have? If it's not that much, then Obama losing NH might not be that bad.
SRG01 said:Oh, as a Canadian observing this, I have one more question: what exactly determines who gets to be the democratic presidential nominee? Is it whoever wins the most primaries?
Wasn't that a McDonalds campaign with this guy:scorcho said:'Mac is Back' has to be the most inauthentic campaign chant i've ever heard.