Mumbles said:Despite studies showing that white men were most likely to traffic drugs through airports, the FAA's official policy until 9/11 was to target black women for drug searches, the idea being that they would be forced to smuggle drugs by their black boyfriends.
Mumbles said:If republicans want the black vote, they're going to have to work long and hard to replace the bridges that they've burned, and so far, they haven't even bought the lumber.
("Personal responsibility" my ass)
If you hadn't already said you wouldn't elaborate, I'd ask you too. Which ideals and options do you mean here?DJ_Tet said:Republicans do want the black vote, but Democrats depend on the black vote. The Republicans offer ideals and options to help minorities better their situation, while Dems want things to remain status quo so they can keep guaranteed voters. It's the same with seniors.
Those don't seem to be exclusively Republican things, though. I mean, the reason most lefty Congressmen and the AARP were against the Medicare reform that passed was because they thought it should do even more for the people but less for the drug companies. Likewise one of the things John Edwards has been talking about since he was running for President was making college accessible for everyone.DJ_Tet said:Did you listen to Bush's speech or did you keep your eyes rolled in the back of your head the whole time?
He made specific mentions to the fact that no seniors will be denied prescription drug coverage. As far as minorities and the poor (god forbid I seperate the two with a slash), the mentions there came with schooling, both in primary form and credits for people going back to college (community college was mentioned a few times).
I don't mind legit questions, I just won't be elaborating towards political hyperbole, my kind is way outnumbered here, and I won't change your opinions, nor you mine. It's just a waste of time. I will explain some of my assertions though.
He made specific mentions to the fact that no seniors will be denied prescription drug coverage. As far as minorities and the poor (god forbid I seperate the two with a slash), the mentions there came with schooling, both in primary form and credits for people going back to college (community college was mentioned a few times).
btrboyev said:um bush's medicare reform for the seniors does not guarantee prescription drug coverage. And if you look at the coverage its not enough
btrboyev said:And there have been credits for those wishing to go back to college for a while now.
In an ownership society, more people will own their health plans, and have the confidence of owning a piece of their retirement. We will always keep the promise of Social Security for our older workers. With the huge Baby Boom generation approaching retirement, many of our children and grandchildren understandably worry whether Social Security will be there when they need it. We must strengthen Social Security by allowing younger workers to save some of their taxes in a personal account - a nest egg you can call your own, and government can never take away.
In the 2000 campaign, Vice President Al Gore said we should sequester the Social Security surpluses in a "lockbox" to prevent appropriators from spending them. Bush agreed in principle. But that commitment went out the window soon after the inauguration. In his first three budgets, Bush (who had the good fortune to take office at a time when the surpluses were growing rapidly) and Congress used $480 billion in excess Social Security payroll taxes to fund basic government operationsabout $160 billion per year!
By so doing, Washington spenders have masked the size of the deficit. For Fiscal 2004which began in October 2003if you factor out the $164 billion Social Security surplus, the on-budget deficit will be at least $639 billion, rather close to the modern peak of 6 percent of GDP. And according to its own projections (the bottom line of Table 8 represents the Social Security surplus), the administration plans to spend an additional $990 billion in such funds between now and 2008. That year, according to the Office of Management and Budget's projections, the on-budget deficit will be about $464 billion. Only by using that year's $238 billion Social Security surplus does the administration arrive at a total, unified deficit of $226 billion. And the ultimate on-budget deficit will almost certainly be worse. OMB has proven in the past few years that its projections can't be trusted.
The accounting for Social Security surpluses has always been dishonest. But in the past few years, the Bush administration has made this shady accounting a central pillar of its fiscal strategy. The unprecedented reliance on these funds hides the failure of the administration to ensure that there is some reasonable correlation between the resources it has at its disposal and the spending commitments it makes.
Well, without more details there's not a lot more to say than what we covered in a thread a few weeks ago, based on a part of some other Republican's book.DJ_Tet said:I have to wonder why there has been no comments on the income tax "thing" though.
Everything else is old ideas, why not tackle a new one? It's newer than national health care, which if you're over 15, you've already seen shot down.
Well, it would depend on the real differences between the IRS and the Replacement. In this thread, most of the discussion was about progressive versus regressive taxation.DJ_Tet said:I missed that thread. Why would anyone be against getting rid of the IRS?
You are a cold, cold person.DJ_Tet said:It's not enough? The seniors have had their whole life to secure housing, are the richest people on the planet, but it's not enough?
Damn. I hope I have people like you around when I'm a senior. God forbid I pay 25% of my medical costs when I've had a lifetime to secure funds. I can't wait to see libs scrambling for funds when my ass is old. THE FUNDS WON'T BE THERE.
edit: Not only have the seniors had a lifetime to secure funds, they've been handed Medicare, plus the most favorable economy in generations. But yeah, let's pay 100% of their remaining costs.
efralope said:link?
I can't find them :/
do they still have the Democratic ones?
Why do you say that?Mumbles said:he referred to "States' Rights" a long-time code word for discrimination.
Look, it doesn't matter if Bush knew that "state's rights" was a racist term or not.
Which doesn't help the people who most need better health care, those who aren't small business employees.More than half of the uninsured are small business employees and their families. In a new term, we must allow small firms to join together to purchase insurance at the discounts available to big companies.
Remember on NPR.org you can generally find speeches from both conventions for free in the archive. not sure if iTunes convention stuff is free.Killthee said:Choose Audiobooks for Genre and click on the pic of the RNC or DNC in the middle of the page. Or search for RNC or DNC.
Mumbles said:Despite studies showing that white men were most likely to traffic drugs through airports, the FAA's official policy until 9/11 was to target black women for drug searches, the idea being that they would be forced to smuggle drugs by their black boyfriends.
Well, when they were brought up in this topic it was mentioned they were free. Does NPR have them available for download, though, or just for streaming? And to people more familiar with Apple's stuff than myself, will their free downloads only work on iTunes/iPod?scola said:Remember on NPR.org you can generally find speeches from both conventions for free in the archive. not sure if iTunes convention stuff is free.
NPR's web archive is incredible, might I add.scola said:Remember on NPR.org you can generally find speeches from both conventions for free in the archive. not sure if iTunes convention stuff is free.
*checks* Streaming Real, so I suppose with the right program it could be done.Hitokage said:NPR's web archive is incredible, might I add.
Joshua: If you conduct some HTML-source-URL voodoo you can save it to your HD, I believe... although I've never actually tried doing it.