Guy LeDouche
Banned
Wow good one. I stand corrected.username quote.
Wow good one. I stand corrected.username quote.
Hmm yase. Freshman year of college. So many good memories.
Nope. I love GAF and my time here but the political threads are generally nasty places I read and don't post, mainly because it's silly to post countless arguments when everyone feels superior to the other.
Many of the prior methods that were used for capital punishment have been ruled unconstitutional, what makes you think the same will not happen with lethal injection?
I've read it plenty. And while certain methods of capital punishment certainly can be cruel and unusual, and certain categories of people such as the young and the mentally handicapped are exempt... capital punishment itself isn't cruel and unusual.
Again, it's not about the people who "deserve" it. Their lives are a bonus.There's only so many hours in the day and so many better things to spend time on that worrying about fucking murderers.
Well, this is a certainly myopic view of the constitution. The definition of cruel and unusual is purposely vague as it's a constantly moving target as social tastes change over time.
I'm well beyond my youthful flirtations with freshman bodies /wink; are you going to rebuttal his points or merely provide some nonsensical comment that does nothing to address what he said?
The Supreme Court found the death penalty to be unconstitutional before they found it constitutional.That's only if you interpret the Constitution as a living document. There are many different methods of interpreting the Constitution.
How many ways can we kill?The possibilities are simply limitless. .
I dunno, maybe it will be. But there are always other forms of execution. The possibilities are simply limitless. That's why I think they should get on that carbon monoxide in the garage idea. I think it's got some real merit. Maybe some animal testing could be done to further our knowledge on the process. Relying on suicides alone might make some people uneasy, I understand that.
Wow.
That's only if you interpret the Constitution as a living document. There are many different methods of interpreting the Constitution.
After reading the crimes, don't feel remotely bad about this.
I didn't say anything about they "deserve" it, I'm saying a murderer's life matters as much as that bug you stepped on this morning without a thought.Again, it's not about the people who "deserve" it.
...um, the fact that capital punishment is constitutional shows that it isn't cruel or unusual. See, we've got this thing here called the Supreme Court, and they look at constitutional issues sometimes, and hey...
*inserts Schoolhouse Rock episode*
No one deserves to be robbed of life. I mean who decides what someone "deserves"?
The first act of robbery of a life doesn't justify the second act of robbery.
The government sanctioned revenge killings is not a justified act, its an unreasoned, barbaric, kneejerk reaction based on societies hot blooded emotions.
The moment you lose someone dear, there is no justice to be had, no way to make it better for all involved. No way to make it better. The killer doesn't have the right to ask for forgiveness after such an evil act but he/she doesn't deserve to die either.
If the argument is about what people "deserve", I ask you this, what does that word even mean and what authority must you have to make such an extreme judgement call?
There's only so many hours in the day and so many better things to spend time on that worrying about fucking murderers.
lol if you think every life is precious lmaoooooo
Hmm yase. Freshman year of college. So many good memories.
There's only so many hours in the day and so many better things to spend time on that worrying about fucking murderers.
lol if you think every life is precious lmaoooooo
Some people deserve to be put to death.
Rapists, child molesters, murderers... They have no room in society and guess where your taxes are going. To feed, clothe, and house these scumbags.
There should be a more humane way to do it definitely.
I don't see why people are like "Who are we to take a life".. These guys are getting more of a chance to live then their victims.
This guy shot and buried this girl alive.. That guy deserved to die, more humanly, but still deserved to die.
There's only so many hours in the day and so many better things to spend time on that worrying about fucking murderers.
lolif you think every life is preciouslmaoooooo
Hmm yase. Freshman year of college. So many good memories.
That's only if you interpret the Constitution as a living document. There are many different methods of interpreting the Constitution.
This just in: SCOTUS is not infallible. Please, for the love all that is holy, you have more than that.
SCOTUS just like our founding fathers, were and are fallible. I'm not trying to point fingers here, but the right has this fantastical point of view; which states, the founding fathers and our documents are somehow divine. Guess what, they aren't. Now, you can state that it hasn't been overturned/etc. but that isn't what we are discussing is it?
And the alternative, currently reality: Guess where more of your taxes are going. To murder them. Ineffectively. With illegal drug combinations bought on the black market.Some people deserve to be put to death.
Rapists, child molesters, murderers... They have no room in society and guess where your taxes are going. To feed, clothe, and house these scumbags.
Technically 27 times. Or 18. The Bill of Rights, though "accepted" with the signing and institution didn't actually get amended on until well after.This is so on point, it hurts. The constitution is so imperfect, it has been amended 17 times since adoption. Gee, them founding fathers sure were perfect and all knowing.
There's only so many hours in the day and so many better things to spend time on that worrying about fucking murderers.
lol if you think every life is precious lmaoooooo
A garage and a car full of gas doesn't cost much.
A garage and a car full of gas doesn't cost much.
lol if you're pro-choice but anti-death penalty.
It costs more to execute them than it does to imprison them for life.
They're also having their freedom revoked for the rest of their life and not being spared the misery of being locked up for 23.5 hours a day.
Who makes this judgement? You don't make this judgement for me or anyone else.
lol if you're pro-choice but anti-death penalty.
Because we're better than that, and we should be leading by example.Why should this guy get better treatment then his victim. He had the choice to do this or not.. She didn't get the choice
So what the hell are they using? Failed drugs that kill people as a side effect, and are being shipped off to prisons at super low prices or something?
Yeah, I know about the problems with procuring the execution drugs, but you'd think they'd be a little more sure that the new drugs they are using wouldn't cause an excruciating, horrifying death.
lol if you're pro-choice but anti-death penalty.
I don't even know why my education would even be relevant to this discussion. In fact it couldn't possibly since my university stream was in Computer Science..... five years ago..
lol if you're pro-choice but anti-death penalty.
lol if you're pro-choice but anti-death penalty.
Same goes for those who are pro life and for the death penalty, right?
I guess everything should be dictated by absolutes then. Alright.
Always makes me wonder why they don't just use the "Car running in a closed garage" suicide method. It seems to work really well and the person in the car just peacefully drifts off to sleep before dying.
Well, they've had to start using different drugs because the ones they used to use can't be used anymore.
This is what the Nazis did. And we all know how humane they were... Right?
Punishment fit the crime, so glad justice was served.
Next up.
Nazis also eat pancake, that doesn't make eating pancake inhumane.
Now this is how to make an argument on the internet.This is what the Nazis did. And we all know how humane they were... Right?
You might be on to something here.Babies are worse than known criminals because they have the potential to be even greater criminals. Better to get rid of them BEFORE they can commit crimes.