Implants have existed long before OF.
OF generation
For whoever made this, this is actually a pretty smart art piece that encapsulates the modern problems of self imagery.OF generation
The more I look the more it look like a removal of excess skinThe Caesarean section is the cherry on the top
It's a horizontal c-section scar. It's more common in planned c-sections. It's the one thing that takes the thing from satire into the relams of misogyny (yeah I know I said the dirty word)The more I look the more it look like a removal of excess skin
Actually it’s a common trope on “these women”: They want the kid, but not the discomfort of giving birth. C-Section should be done when medical necessary, not because you can afford it.It's a horizontal c-section scar. It's more common in planned c-sections. It's the one thing that takes the thing from satire into the relams of misogyny (yeah I know I said the dirty word)
It's a horizontal c-section scar. It's more common in planned c-sections. It's the one thing that takes the thing from satire into the relams of misogyny (yeah I know I said the dirty word)
I mean I literally said that it is a C section scar and it is the type of incision more often seen in a planned C-section. So I am not sure why I need to at least educate myself on something I stated in the post.If you are going to reeee, at least educate yourself on the common practices of Cesarean sections and the common trend among women in the modern age who request and plan it. Has nothing to do with “misogyny”.
Why would a c-section scar equate with misogyny?It's a horizontal c-section scar. It's more common in planned c-sections. It's the one thing that takes the thing from satire into the relams of misogyny (yeah I know I said the dirty word)
Thats a pretty big leap.into more "fuck these selfish thots who are posting nudes on the internet instead of taking care of their kid, which they saw the birth of as something inconvenient"
Thats a pretty big leap.
Yep seems like projection for sure.That is a classic Superman level leap in logic. But some folks just want to find reasons to be offended.
OF generation
I interpret this piece as the lust for voluptuous women as a side effect of our consumption driven society, desiring more of everything material while forcing woman into an ideal that neglects their natural beauty and self.
Honestly I’m not going to be that upset if we all live long enough to witness cybernetic/machine/exoskeleton enhancements and augments on a regular basis.Only the beginning really.
Still waiting for that big jump in battery tech to make some of these things feasible. But yea I agree. I'm gonna be pissed if I die before I can implant my brain in a cyborg body.Honestly I’m not going to be that upset if we all live long enough to witness cybernetic/machine/exoskeleton enhancements and augments on a regular basis.
I’ve been seeing some things on the horizon that I’m fully ready to witness in public.
What is your problem?Go touch some grass OP.
Cheatengine.Tough fap, but I'm already plastered.
What is your problem?
Hahahaha jerk off once in while…you seem crankyGet off the porn sites: this shit really doesn't represent society at large.
According to who? The chief reasons women have elective C-sections has little to do with the pain of labour, but about avoiding the complications of vaginal deliveries, namely, but not limited to perineal tears and lifelong urinary incontinence. The post-partum recovery phase for c-sections has plenty of pain. Indeed, an expecting mother will be counselled on the pros and cons of vaginal delivery vs elective c-section, and typically one of the pros of a vaginal delivery is you’ll be more mobile sooner ie not limited by a large and painful wound. Anyone who denigrates women for electing to have a c-section is likely a misogynist, militant midwife, complementary and alternative medicine practitioner, an ignoramus, or a combination of any of the aforementioned.Actually it’s a common trope on “these women”: They want the kid, but not the discomfort of giving birth. C-Section should be done when medical necessary, not because you can afford it.
The male equivalent of this is a guy taking a selfie while jerking off to a picture of himself taking a selfie.
"Too posh to push" is the phrase I've heard a few times.If you are going to reeee, at least educate yourself on the common practices of Cesarean sections and the common trend among women in the modern age who request and plan it. Has nothing to do with “misogyny”.
Nah, women are scheduling their c-section to A. avoid the last few weeks of pregnancy with the highest risk of stretch marks, B. have the delivery during the day at a time convenient for them, and C. to avoid labor which hollywood has trained women to fear as the most painful experience possible. Studies also show women who elect to have c-sections have less connection to their baby and feel inadequate as a mother (they didn't experience the true challenge of childbirth). Plus not going through the vaginal canal affects the babys colonization with "good" gut bacteria. I knew an ob/gyn that would show up to work at night and just c-section every woman not in active labor just to clear the labor deck for nighttime cases. In the old days it was wild shit.According to who? The chief reasons women have elective C-sections has little to do with the pain of labour, but about avoiding the complications of vaginal deliveries, namely, but not limited to perineal tears and lifelong urinary incontinence. The post-partum recovery phase for c-sections has plenty of pain. Indeed, an expecting mother will be counselled on the pros and cons of vaginal delivery vs elective c-section, and typically one of the pros of a vaginal delivery is you’ll be more mobile sooner ie not limited by a large and painful wound. Anyone who denigrates women for electing to have a c-section is likely a misogynist, militant midwife, complementary and alternative medicine practitioner, an ignoramus, or a combination of any of the aforementioned.