MIMIC said:I'm glad Jamie Foxx is getting a lot of attention now. I was a fan of his when he was on "The Jamie Foxx Show." I always KNEW he was a great actor....he just wasn't recognized yet.
Shig said:Do you even know what a 'deus ex machina' is?
Re: animated feature, yeah total gyp that Polar Express didn't get the nod, easily way better than Shark Tale... And didn't The Triplets of Belleville come out last year?
JasoNsider said:I completely ignore the red carpet bullshit and instead concentrate on seeing that people who put their neck on the line get rewarded for it. Every year it's the same deal - there are those who risked a great deal and finally get rewarded for their efforts and then there are those who are sorely overlooked.
The only thing I care about is that there really are people out there who sweat the small stuff and sometimes they get rewarded for sticking it out with an oscar nomination.
Meier said:I'm annoyed but not necessarily shocked by Paul's absence since comedic roles rarely get Oscar noms, but Collateral not making it in for Cinematography is shocking and utterly mind-boggling. It has some of the best I've seen in my entire life.
It's either because it's a sequel based on an original concept or because Kim Krizan wrote a script for it predating the Linklater/Delpy/Hawke script. I'm gonna go with the sequel idea though.distantmantra said:Why is Before Sunset in the adapted screenplay category? Aside from it being a sequel, it isn't based on any pre-existing material, at least that I know of.
JasoNsider said:How in the world did Mann's visually astonishing picture get overlooked in Cinematography?
Shig said:Do you even know what a 'deus ex machina' is?
border said:Why the hell is Tupac: Resurrection even eligible for Best Documentary? According to Box Office Mojo, it opened on November 14, 2003.....and left theaters on December 25, 2003. It wasn't even showing at all during the 2004 calendar year so why the hell is it nominated for Best 2004 Documentary? How is that fair to the other documentaries that were legitimately released in the past 12 months?
J2 Cool said:Also, Shark's Tale!!? WTFISTHISSHIT!? If the Incredibles doesn't win I'm gonna puke. Btw, where's Pixar's short, Boundin'? I liked that one a lot. Felt very cartoonish, akin to the golden age. Simple song and hilarious animation. Ah well.
Matlock said:The thing that pushes the plot and/or the main character along.![]()
Matlock said:dear duckroll
I'm a gonna pirate a shitload of anime, and I'm a gonna LIKE IT
![]()
of course, sudden is not always the main point here: denote the first definition
COCKLES said:Worst lineup of 'best film' for quite some time.
bonesquad said:AHHH! Eternal Sunshine and Jim Carrey got SCREWED! Fuck you Mr. Oscar!
No, Ghost in the Shell 2 was listed as eligible for Best Animated Feature.Matlock said:As for GITS2: it's origin is Japan, isn't it? Maybe that disqualified it from domestic best animated film. I dunno.
It was probably still playing in a few theaters in 2004, anyway it wasn't nominated last year.border said:Why the hell is Tupac: Resurrection even eligible for Best Documentary? According to Box Office Mojo, it opened on November 14, 2003.....and left theaters on December 25, 2003. It wasn't even showing at all during the 2004 calendar year so why the hell is it nominated for Best 2004 Documentary? How is that fair to the other documentaries that were legitimately released in the past 12 months?
MetatronM said:No, Ghost in the Shell 2 was listed as eligible for Best Animated Feature.
Regardless, I've never been so apathetic towards an Oscar nominations list before. I mean, it was expected, but really there's just nothing here I really give a damn about.
Mike Works said:Kate Winslet got nominated for best Actress for Eternal Sunshine, but Eternal Sunshine didn't get nominated for best picture? WHAT THE FUCK? Jesus fuck that's retarded.
Apparently they would rather nominate movies that weren't even released in 2004...Meier said:I'm pretty shocked that Tarnation wasn't nominated for Best Documentary.
Boundin' was nominated last year. It lost to Harvie Krumpet.J2 Cool said:Btw, where's Pixar's short, Boundin'? I liked that one a lot. Felt very cartoonish, akin to the golden age. Simple song and hilarious animation. Ah well.
No, I think the whole thing is bullshit too. That said, I tune in to see the occasional hard working individual win and get the chance to make a good speech. Otherwise, as I said in the other thread, these awards are largely voted upon in a hype-induced popularity contest fashion, and it's pretty fucked up. I've even seen indications that the Academy looks to nominate popular films because the television ratings soar when the masses have something they like to root for (see Titanic and ROTK).Minotauro said:Am I the only one who's completely jaded to this whole process? Aside from a general distaste towards trying to determine which film is "better", I'm sickened by all the pagentry and bullshit that goes along with the Academy Awards. I'm all for honoring filmmakers and actors and whoever but does it really have to be such an overblown event? Ugh, maybe it's just not for me. I guess the awards are really more aimed at people who watch Entertainment Tonight and like to discuss all the "star" gossip. It just seems to me that the original idea for the Oscars now takes a backseat to entertainment and fashion.
I know I'm definitely in the minority and I'm sure no one wants me crapping on all the super fun Oscar hoopla but it gets more and more absurd every year. I'm honestly considering not watching this year. Ah, who am I kidding?
Alucard said:The lack of love for Eternal Sunshine and Jim Carrey totally stupifies me.
SteveMeister said:That's the danger of being released early in the year. Eternal Sunshine was released 19 days after the 76th Academy Awards. The production company would have had to mount a hype campaign late in '04 in order to remind Academy voters of it.
Memles said:The earliest released film nominated for Best Picture is Sideways, which entered like 2 theatres on October 22nd. There's a short attention span for you.
Apple Jax said:Mark me down as being disappointed at not seeing Giamatti in there. He's just one of those guys who's been in it so long that you'd love for him to get some awesome recognition. Suberb actor who choses interesting... yet fun roles. I got yer back, buddy.
Matlock said:The thing that pushes the plot and/or the main character along.![]()
etiolate said:And pardon me, but I thought Clint Eastwood already got his sorry-we-overlooked-you-when-you-were-younger award for Unforgiven?
Drozmight said:Why does anyone care about these things anymore?