ShadowRed said:
I assume you mean they can't have... I'm not a celeb but it seems I suffer from the same "symetrical brain" disease as they do, cause I can't seem to understand why they can't have wealth, fame and their privacy. Where in the Constitution or other body of law does it say that if you have fame and or wealth you loose all privacy?
Well, I figure the paparazzi are a part of the "deal" when you become as famous as, say, someone like Brad Pit. It's something they have to live with.
The film itself, and correct me if I am wrong, wasn't very successful. That may speak of the general public's sympathy for celebs unfortunate enough to be victim to the paparazzi.
There are some in the world who have to suffer far worse than paparazzi, who don't have their millions of dollars and fame to comfort them.
I will agree that the loss of privacy is unfortunate, put the paparazzi do have their rights as well. Some do overstep the boundaries, and they should be punished. And the celebs who punch photographers in the face should also be (and have) punished.
I just got sick of seeing Mel Gibson whine about this. I should watch less television.
