Thick Thighs Save Lives
NeoGAF's Physical Games Advocate Extraordinaire
Whether you're a Steam devotee or have a taskbar overflowing with different logos, launchers are a staple (and unavoidable) part of modern PC gaming. And because they're so ubiquitous, it's hard not to have strong feelings about them, adding to your book of grudges every time one of them bugs out on you, changes a key feature you loved, or just commits the crime of making you stretch your game library across yet another app.
It's been about five years since we last made an accounting of the hobby's many launchers, and it's surprising how much has changed in that time. The publisher-specific launchers that briefly bloomed and spread have shrunk or been forced to change. Uplay is now Ubisoft Connect; Origin has become simply EA; and some, such as Bethesda's launcher, have disappeared entirely. Meanwhile, new players have thrown their hats in the ring, and the longstanding top dogs have changed and grown in new directions.
So how does the launcher landscape lie in 2024? Let's put some numbers to it.
STEAM
Pros: User-friendly, feature rich, huge range of games
Cons: Inescapable gimmicks, discoverability issues
Score: 90%
Despite some flaws and frustrations, Steam is the best it's ever been. After all this time, still no other launcher comes close.
EPIC GAMES STORE
Pros: Free games, good discounts
Cons: Everything else
Score: 41%
Over five years on from launch, the Epic Games Store still offers barebones features and a dreadful user experience.
GOG GALAXY
Pros: Unifies your game libraries, wide selection of older and retro games
Cons: Can be a bit fiddly, often desyncs
Score: 77%
An impressive, if quite fiddly, attempt to unify our game libraries under one launcher.
XBOX
Pros: Game Pass, simple but effective layout
Cons: Library doesn't distinguish well between owned games and Game Pass games
Score: 65%
A nice platform for accessing Game Pass on PC, but if you aren't subscribed it has little to offer.
MICROSOFT STORE
Pros: Er?
Cons: Slow, awkward, poor library functionality
Score: 21%
A dreadful launcher that's also totally redundant when it comes to gaming.
AMAZON GAMES
Pros: Solid interface, free games through Prime Gaming
Cons: No store functionality means it has limited use
Score: 61%
PC gaming's most easily overlooked launcher may be limited, but as a platform for free Prime Gaming games, it does the job.
EA LAUNCHER
Pros: Marginally better than Origin
Cons: Limited selection of games, very slow, barebones library
Score: 33%
The textbook example of a launcher you only have installed because you have to, and resent every time you're forced to use it.
UBISOFT CONNECT
Pros: Marginally better than Uplay
Cons: Limited selection of games, barebones library, annoying meta-layer
Score: 35%
Another launcher only used under duress, Ubisoft Connect's most notable feature is adding even more things to earn and buy to Ubisoft's already overstuffed games.
BATTLE.NET
Pros: Snappy, all your Blizzard games in one place
Cons: Awful layout, confused identity, extremely limited selection of games
Score: 31%
One of the ugliest launchers, in service to a small selection of games muddled by the inclusion of other Activision properties.
PC gaming's many launchers, reviewed for 2024: Steam still puts the rest to shame
Let's put a score on them all—the good, the bad, and the GOGly.
www.pcgamer.com
Last edited: