I try not to think about it, my heart can't take the strain. 3:
PC Low Settings Screenshot Thread
- Thread starter DodgyGeezerFella
- Start date
I try not to think about it, my heart can't take the strain. 3:
John Rabbit
Banned
320 x 240 Software Renderer (resized to 800 x 600 with 'nearest neighbor' to preserve pixelatedness)
John Rabbit
Banned
OpenGL Renderer, lowest texture quality. Oh god my eyes.
./ Thread.
I died inside lol
See? Now I want a PSX AC demake, my god looks like the 0.4 a launch PS2 game would look like
Cuban Legend
Member
I used to have one of those, in fact I probably have some old SS of some PC games I played on it at low settings.
I'll post em if I find em.
jediyoshi
Member
I fortunately only got into the series and first played TLJ a few weeks ago. Tornquist put up a blog post not too relatively long ago about it
http://www.ragnartornquist.com/journal/2012/1/1/twentytwelve.html
jufonuk
not tag worthy
320 x 240 Software Renderer (resized to 800 x 600 with 'nearest neighbor' to preserve pixelatedness)
I wanted this for the DS instead we got C.O.R.E
Isn't that the section where he has wet hair?
StoppedInTracks
Member
It is pretty telling how there is only slight to none difference between LOW and HIGH in recent console to PC ports.
It means the devs spend exactly 0 time on featuring different engine settings for the PC version, *sigh*.
It means the devs spend exactly 0 time on featuring different engine settings for the PC version, *sigh*.
Actually. That shot is right after him falling in a pool of water. I think that's why it looks different there.
EDIT: Beaten.
DonMigs85
Member
Low to medium is usually what you get on consoles. Other than resolution and maybe better textures, DX11 bells and whistles are all the extras you get on PC.
It's a little tricky, because that's likely, but not *necessarily* the case; it's quite possible to make something that looks shit but is still fairly demanding, and it's reasonably possible to make something that looks quite good but is remarkable lightweight. I'd be interested to hear what sort of level of framerate difference people are getting on the min-quality settings compared to the maximum ones; if something doesn't look that much worse but doubles or triples the framerate, they've done some funky voodoo (or, I guess, some of the max-detail features are *extremely* expensive for only small gain!)
At first glance, I thought I was looking at SimCity.
Isn't that the section where he has wet hair?
dang, maybe I walked around too much before that cause I have a screenshot with regular hair :O
Mirrors edge
Such great art design.
benjipwns
Banned
Edge
Superbrothers: Sword & Sworcery
Also, dunno if posted, but there's a kotaku article on this thread.
Edit: Nvm there is a link.
Superbrothers: Sword & Sworcery
Edit: Nvm there is a link.
Team fortress2 is the only game i can play on low. i played on low until release and only recently upgraded my pc.
because tf2 doesn't have intricate, complex art designs, and that mostly everything is bland (but bland in a good way) playing on low didn't really make me think i was missing out on a whole lot of stuff.
because tf2 doesn't have intricate, complex art designs, and that mostly everything is bland (but bland in a good way) playing on low didn't really make me think i was missing out on a whole lot of stuff.
RoadHazard
Gold Member
Wow. That's just amazingly terrible.
Cjdamon042
Member
Broder Salsa
Banned
The game actually still looks rather nice today on high.
The game actually still looks rather nice today on high.
Makes me want to see what B&W1 looks like on low
I'm somewhat distracted by the fact that you appear to be fondling the avatar's udders.
Metalmurphy
Member
Dead Island
Barely any difference besides some textures.
Max settings: http://www.abload.de/img/deadislandgame2012-0614my4.png
Max settings: http://www.abload.de/img/deadislandgame2012-061v89k.png
Barely any difference besides some textures.
Max settings: http://www.abload.de/img/deadislandgame2012-0614my4.png
Max settings: http://www.abload.de/img/deadislandgame2012-061v89k.png
Coming up... it doesn't actually run on current systems, but I played through it that way back in 2002 or whenever it was.
EDIT: Get this: it doesn't actually start on the lowest settings. It started once on the highest ones I had somehow forced it into running on a year ago in Win7, but upon changing the settings to minimum it won't actually run at all.
EDIT 2: Win 98 compatability mode:
http://www.abload.de/img/bwssaiyja.png[IMG]
[IMG]http://www.abload.de/img/bwss2i999r.png[IMG]
[/s]
That is the maximum resolution the game will actually render at.
Last edit: there might be a launcher where you can make the settings even lower... I'll get on that.
Edit 4: Okay, here are the actually lowest settings for the game. I played this at 14 FPS for dozens of hours.
[IMG]http://www.abload.de/img/bwsslowestfg9zx.png
ArtistDude88
Member
Nyoh my gawd at the Red Faction pictures *wipes tear away
Broder Salsa
Banned
Fondling the cow is the only way to make it know eating rocks is good.
It was being a bitch not wanting to work and in the end refused to work in any res other than this :
edit : dammit, hadn't seen your edits rapstah... Oh well, more black and white! Dat scaling
ArtistDude88
Member
Not bad... Not bad...
320 x 240 Software Renderer (resized to 800 x 600 with 'nearest neighbor' to preserve pixelatedness)
It looks absolutely amazing ;_;
. Especially the terrain in WoodenLung's first and Rapstah's second shot.
Was going to post some Supreme Commander but it's already been covered so I'll just say that Serious Sam 3 looks a lot like Redneck Rampage here.
Similar threads
- Poll