Only if
In retrospect, it really sucks that Delany didn't snatch up Mizzou when he had the chance. They would have been a ready and willing replacement for Penn State.
No worries. Rutgers would be beating down the door at this point, I'm sure.
It sounds like nothing about the culture has changed.
It sounds like nothing about the culture has changed.
Hell, I'm a Rutgers alum and would kill to be in the big 12, but if you're taking out Penn State, Pitt's probably the best replacement. Part of Rutger's appeal was being Penn State's butt buddy and carrying a new state, while with Pitt you keep Penn.
If we could get Pitt to renege on their commitment to the ACC, I'd be all for letting them in.
It would be the ultimate "Fuck you!" to Penn State.
Pitt would do it in a heartbeat. ACC's not the big east, but it's also not one of the big four either, it's in this weird purgatory.
Oh man this joke is even funnier the 100th time you hear it.
I'm sure it has probably crossed Delany's mind. The conference has to do something because I don't trust the NCAA to do anything.
It sounds like nothing about the culture has changed.
Which is exactly why the NCAA needs to come in with the banhammer. Doesn't matter at all the current staff had nothing to do with it. They may have had nothing to do with it directly, but they have absolutely no problem in covering it up and trying to downplay it. Now they're keeping the statue intact, effectively ignoring this entire scandal in the long run. They're absolutely going to want to erase history of this and sweep it under the rug ASAP to preserve their precious football program.
They need to be hit hard. Penn State as an institution has learned NOTHING from this whole debacle.
The omnipotent and infallible Penn State Board of Trustees have voted that the Joe Paterno statue will Not be taken down
Paterno has done too many positive things for the university for it to be erased by one small slip up.
SMFH
So fucking shitty.The omnipotent and infallible Penn State Board of Trustees have voted that the Joe Paterno statue will Not be taken down
Paterno has done too many positive things for the university for it to be erased by one small slip up.
SMFH
Note how they do this on Saturday night so most people don't hear about it.
The omnipotent and infallible Penn State Board of Trustees have voted that the Joe Paterno statue will Not be taken down
Paterno has done too many positive things for the university for it to be erased by one small slip up.
SMFH
Is Penn State just consistently and overwhelmingly run by shitty, horrible people? I mean, what the fuck.
I have no doubt the same thing (leaving the statue up) would have happened almost anywhere else. The university system in the United States is an amalgam of money, school pride, and power that won't stop protecting the school at any cost. It's sad.
Shut the football program down for a few years. It's the least that can be done to force some change of priorities at the school.
Others believe that because this is a criminal issue and not a sports concern, the NCAA will avoid interfering. Milstein vehemently disagrees. "This is all about sports," he said. "All about protecting your sports empire."
Screw that. Shut the football team down permanently. Penn State should never play another football game as long as the school exists.
When Charles Robinson (investigative sports journalist) tried to get the former head of the PSU PD to share some insight into what happened during the '98 investigation his answers was "I don't know why you're doing this":
https://twitter.com/Rand_Getlin/status/224328366701035520/photo/1/large
SbB providing some more info:
http://media.sportsbybrooks.com/2012/07/thomasharmonpage3.pdf
i.e. the child psychologist who was crucial in convincing the DA to not press charges against Sandusky in '98 was later an independent contractor for PSU for over 6 years.
And a good article (may have previously been posted?) on how PSU may face not only over $100 million in civil suit pay outs to victims, but be slapped with civil rights violations in conjunction to Title IX violations:
Penn State could pay $100 million in civil damages to Sandusky's victims and lose public funding
Some more great stuff found here on:
Analysis: FBI Director Louis Freeh, state's results differ greatly. Why? i.e. state investigator was a big Paterno fan, did she purposely go easy on him in her investigation?
I'm pretty certain that this whole ordeal has answered that question.Is Penn State just consistently and overwhelmingly run by shitty, horrible people? I mean, what the fuck.
Screw that. Shut the football team down permanently. Penn State should never play another football game as long as the school exists.
There's a good system in place to ensure people with outlooks like yours are never allowed to make key decisions affecting large amounts of people.
Sorry--as that lawyer states, this entire thing was covered up to protect the "integrity" of the football program. Not sure how you can defend that.
By the way--several great universities exist without a decent football program. The school could survive.
Losing the football program would be much better than losing public funding because of Title Ix/Clery Act violations. THAT is what people and Penn State should be worried about.
This logic doesn't really work when you consider that one person has actually been convicted despite the evidence of a large-scale cover-up, or that the entire purpose of the cover-up was to protect the football program; not shutting down the football program at least temporarily sends the message that even though they got caught, they still got away with their goal.If Penn State can realistically ensure they have eliminated any catalysts potentially leading to a similar situation occurring again, they should be allowed to continue as a football institution.
But demanding a school in 50 years time still be punished for crime committed decades previous is ultimate lunacy. It's called progress. We learn from our errors, we build on these lessons learnt and we gradually evolve to a time where situations like this could never arise.
People suggesting 'BAN THEM FOREVER' are naive to the fact a punishment like that is a new problem created, while the main issue remains broken.
If Penn State can realistically ensure they have eliminated any catalysts potentially leading to a similar situation occurring again, they should be allowed to continue as a football institution.
But demanding a school in 50 years time still be punished for crime committed decades previous is ultimate lunacy. It's called progress. We learn from our errors, we build on these lessons learnt and we gradually evolve to a time where situations like this could never arise.
People suggesting 'BAN THEM FOREVER' are naive to the fact a punishment like that is a new problem created, while the main issue remains broken.
There's a good system in place to ensure people with outlooks like yours are never allowed to make key decisions affecting large amounts of people.
What Freeh says those emails show and what his team concluded after more than 400 interviews was that Paterno, Spanier, Curley and Schultz were concerned about preserving the reputation, fundraising ability and overall image of Penn State and its revered football program, and so they actively decided to keep Sanduskys allegations to themselves.
I think people should be fired, go to jail, and be held to public ridicule. But kill the football program? Makes no sense to me.
They let child rape go unpunished and unreported for years so the football program could maintain it's reputation, financial gain, and recruiting powers.
If that's not an argument for getting rid of the football program, I don't know what is.
It's not. The people who did those things should be held responsible to the full extent of criminal and civil liability, and public shame. By your logic, because they did those things for the general reputation as well of penn state, then the school should no longer accept students and should be shut down.
If a public company has a CEO who violates sarbanes oxley and defrauds shareholders, you don't shut down the corporation, you fire the responsible parties, pay out the liabilities, and continue on, as the justice and civil systems hold the guilty parties personally responsible.
This logic doesn't really work when you consider that one person has actually been convicted despite the evidence of a large-scale cover-up, or that the entire purpose of the cover-up was to protect the football program; not shutting down the football program at least temporarily sends the message that even though they got caught, they still got away with their goal.
More like crime committed for a decade. Again, there is clear evidence that the leaders of the college knew about the crimes and ignored them. They didn't "learn" anything, and wouldn't have even made any changes had the crimes not been revealed. This would have been buried forever.
Except there's this part. If you allowed child molestation to happen, all for the good of a football program, you need to lose that football program. Minimum 5 years.
And when the guilty party is the entire school ecosystem and delusional reverence of their football program? Yeah. you kill the program.
It's not. The people who did those things should be held responsible to the full extent of criminal and civil liability, and public shame. By your logic, because they did those things for the general reputation as well of penn state, then the school should no longer accept students and should be shut down.
If a public company has a CEO who violates sarbanes oxley and defrauds shareholders, you don't shut down the corporation, you fire the responsible parties, pay out the liabilities, and continue on, as the justice and civil systems hold the guilty parties personally responsible.
But as I've said before, the people responsible for the reprehensible conduct are now gone. They will pay for their crimes.
Penn State has been cleared out and already many new measures and structures have been implemented to ensure nothing similar could ever happen again. I can understand the argument of having the Penn State football program restructured so as to strip away the power it wielded over the college culture and its finances, but euthanising the program permanently? That solves nothing.
It's just not as simple as that. The consequences for the school are too large, too detrimental for too many people. Too many innocent people. And I fail to see how what it achieves in the long run, besides being a symbolic gesture. Will the victims seek any solace from the footy program being eradicated? Who wins from that?
Found this little nugget since we are on the topic about NCAA punishments.
Caltech is on NCAA probation. No, really