he probably didn't have his gun out when they tried tazing him.So why try to taze him then first?
he probably didn't have his gun out when they tried tazing him.So why try to taze him then first?
The police are directly responsible for the woman's death because she was killed by bullets they let off. They had options, they chose poorly.
So why fire it where innocent people can potentially be harm? Still seems like I a brash decision.His life probably wasn't flashing before his eyes when he was tasering the guy. As for how you miss, easily. It's fucking hard to hit shit with a pistol even when your adrenaline isn't pumping out of fear.
I agree.
Here's a hypothetical to show the logic: Police involved in high speed chase with criminal. Criminal swerves towards pursuing police car. Police car subsequently looses control and hits someone.
His crime is ignoring a police officer and "reaching into his waistband".
Surely enough reason to open fire, disregard casualties and gun down two people.
An alleged gunman who prompted a fatal police shooting at an Orlando nightclub now faces first-degree murder charges in the death of a woman who was struck by an officer's stray bullet.
The alleged gunman, Kody Roach, 23, was wounded by police in the August 19 shooting, which occurred at Vixen Bar at 118 South Orange Avenue. Roach, who remains hospitalized, was initially arrested on charges of carrying a concealed firearm. He now also faces charges of attempted armed burglary and armed trespassing in an occupied structure.
Maria Godinez, 22, was struck and killed by a stray bullet fired by an Orlando police officer who confronted Roach at the bar.
Roach's new arrest report released on Tuesday details many of the same circumstances described immediately after the shooting, but it also gets into more detail.
For example, Godinez was shot in the shoulder and collapsed about 6-to-8 ft. inside the bar.
It also details how surveillance video obtained by Vixen Bar shows Roach dropping his gun after he was kicked out of the bar for carrying a gun.
The video also shows him trying to get back inside the bar as police confronted him outside.
"Unsuccessful in opening the locked door again, Roach then raises his shirt with his left hand, while rapidly reaching into his waistband with his right hand," the report details.
Officer Eduard Sanguino fires nine shots, according to the report. Roach was shot at least five times, the report indicates. One of the shots ricocheted, hitting Lt. Frank Nunez in the shin. One of the bullets hit Godinez.
Once Roach collapsed, the report says he dropped a .40-caliber Ruger firearm from his hands.
The Florida Department of Law Enforcement continues to investigate the police-involved shooting.
As standard procedure, the officers in the shooting, Sanguino and Officer Jeff Angel, were placed on paid administrative leave.
Sanguino has been with OPD for two-and-a-half years, and Angel has been with OPD for 14 years. Both Sanguino and Angel are part of the downtown bike unit of OPD.
Police said Nunez has been on the force for 19 years.
he probably didn't have his gun out when they tried tazing him.
Don't worry everyone - the gun was in his hand. Also there was crack dust all over him and a little bag of MJ.
even if he never touched his gun, reaching into his waistband would be enough because 'his gun is in his waistband' was part of the 9/11 call.According to the report he was shot before taking any kind of gun out.
You're not close when you shoot from a taser.They managed to successfully taser him but managed to also miss gunshots? How do you miss from that proximity?
Because it's not a hollywood movie.Cømet;128341604 said:- Why always aim for the upper body/head, surely the aim is to incapacitate so an arrest can be made? Why not blow their kneecap, or generally just shoot them in the knee, foot, or somewhere else that's less likely to be lethal? Surely that'd also lessen the risk of lethal collateral?
FIRST DEGREE FELONY MURDER. Cause that's fair.
Shoot at the search function nine times if old.
#notallcops
According to the report he was shot before taking any kind of gun out.
They managed to successfully taser him but managed to also miss gunshots? How do you miss from that proximity?
even if he never touched his gun, reaching into his waistband would be enough because 'his gun is in his waistband' was part of the 9/11 call.
Stop with this noise. No one is pushing an anticop agenda by calling into question how police work is actually done.seems fair to me
keep trying to push that anti-cop narrative though, these threads are always a fun read
So why try to taze him then first?
Without going into the law, or doing a super analysis of what's happened given the facts of the case as we know them, I'm going to say that this "shoot first ask questions later" policy we have in regard to policing doesn't seem like it's always the best solution.
It just seems like there could have been another way to resolve this without someone being dead, especially considering that the gun wasn't loaded. I can't co-sign on this, even if I think that the police acted appropriately (and I'm not saying that I do).
Edit:
Before 15 people quote me, yes, I'm aware that they tried to taze him first. I don't think one attempt at a non-lethal solution shouldn't be the end all be all green light justification for putting someone in the ground.
If he was a "gun-wielding maniac", kinda odd that his gun was supposedly tucked in his waistband. Also "exchange of gunfire" is an odd phrase if only one side is firing.
Shit like this is why I lean strongly towards abolishing prisons. Jesus fucking Christ this is disgusting.Felony murder rule.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryan_Holle
Guy lent his car to friends while he passed out at a party. Charged with first degree murder.
seems fair to me
keep trying to push that anti-cop narrative though, these threads are always a fun read
They put the lives of others at risk opening fire in that scenario.Suspects, particularly in the us usually do stand perfectly still while the police open fire on them after being tased and while resisting arrest.
Usually.
Shit like this is why I lean strongly towards abolishing prisons. Jesus fucking Christ this is disgusting.
^ or it's that police have been overreacting to minorities who commit crimes and have straight up been murdering/not investigating cases where minorities are the victims.
you seem to be reading into my post a bit. he has two charges against him right now, resisting arrest and 2nd degree murder, yes?
Felony murder rule.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryan_Holle
Guy lent his car to friends while he passed out at a party. Charged with first degree murder.
So why try to taze him then first?
Cømet;128341604 said:Two things:
- Why not use rubber bullets?
- Why always aim for the upper body/head, surely the aim is to incapacitate so an arrest can be made? Why not blow their kneecap, or generally just shoot them in the knee, foot, or somewhere else that's less likely to be lethal? Surely that'd also lessen the risk of lethal collateral?
America, you really need to sort out your gun laws.
So why fire it where innocent people can potentially be harm? Still seems like I a brash decision.
Felony murder rule.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryan_Holle
Guy lent his car to friends while he passed out at a party. Charged with first degree murder.
They put the lives of others at risk opening fire in that scenario.
This is.... absolute insanity. I don't have the words...
I know people will dismiss this, but the elapsed time is something to consider as the main factor for why the situation escalated the way it did. If the guy reached for his gun right after they tried to taze him, then what else could they do? I agree, if it was a significant amount of time for this kind of situation (1-2 minutes) then, yeah, quickly go for another non-lethal attempt. Otherwise, there isn't a stop clock to let you know how much time you have to consider options.
They put the lives of others at risk opening fire in that scenario.
I think having the chance to take 10 years and getting life is a raw deal. But knowingly giving your car to people who are going to go commit a felony? Uh what were you really expecting to happen?
Stop with this noise. No one is pushing an anticop agenda by calling into question how police work is actually done.
well, mostly because of this articleNo those are not the only charges he is facing. Why would you think they were?
It's hard to judge without some video evidence. How far away was the subject? Seems like even if the police officer was justified, dude should be far away from active duty. Police officers should need to meet minimum accuracy to be active duty same as continuing education for Doctors, Dentists, and Pharmacists.
Once Roach collapsed, the report says he dropped a .40-caliber Ruger firearm from his hands.
They told him what they were going to do, and they couldn't have done it unless he gave them his car.
this is someone who should have watched the 'dont talk to the police' youtube lecture.Felony murder rule.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryan_Holle
Guy lent his car to friends while he passed out at a party. Charged with first degree murder.
no, it's murder because the perp made the cops kill the innocent bystander.If you accidentally kill someone isnt that manslaughter?
Or does that not apply to the police?
If you accidentally kill someone isnt that manslaughter?
Or does that not apply to the police?
well, mostly because of this article
http://www.clickorlando.com/news/orlando-police-drops-murder-charge-in-bar-shooting/27835916
which states that "Kody Roach now faces a second-degree murder charge for the death of Maria Godinez and resisting arrest with violence." and that the first-degree and robbery charges were removed. i interpreted that to mean that currently those were the charges against him. obviously more can follow.
Uh, how is this a problem?