RustyNails
Member
This can't be handled by states because states don't have interest in developing structures that benefit the country as a whole, rather than just the states'. If you recall, we did not have interstate system for 150 years, until FDR took a big 'ol map of USA and connected 8 big cities with a blue sharpie pen. I don't understand why you went off on the bombs tangent. So because the federal government gives contracts to defense contractors suddenly means that all the other things they do (like keeping our country resemble a country, and not Somalia) are meaningless? If you want to rail against defense spending, welcome to the club. We got a pretty big chorus here. If you want to rail against bailouts, again, it's a legitimate issue but one that doesn't warrant the complete shrinkage of federal government to just printing money and raising army.Mardak said:And why can't this be handled by the states? Why should I have my income taken away from me by the federal government to bail out large corporations and give preference to the military corporations that want more wars so they can keep making bombs?
And how do retailer specific health standards work? How do people decide wal-mart's codes are better than costco's? After 10 people die from food poisoning, or after 200? What's the drawback of having a unified health standards for ALL retailers? Again, the infiltration of special interest groups and lobbyists in our system is the single most important problem facing the government. But instead of treating the disease, you want to destroy the patient.And how is having them controlled by the federal government better? The big corporations only need to convince the members of congress to get preferential treatment. And similarly corporations only need to infiltrate the one federal FDA to make sure regulations benefit them more than other companies.
Tyson Foods produces a lot of meat for the whole world and their employees have made it in to the FDA. And Tyson Foods prevents retailers like Costco from doing its own safety tests because they say the FDA has done enough testing.
Why does there need to be just one federal agency instead of multiple where consumers can decide if they trust one or the other. Or similarly if they trust retailers like Costco to do their own testing.