jamesinclair said:I hope 95% of the podcast is about secession
YesDOO13ER said:I... kind of want in on this, or the next one at least. But I know dick about Skype. Is it free?
GhaleonEB said:Seems TPM was Anonymous' latest target. I was irked enough to start a thread.
Ghal you okay tonight, lol. Wrong thread.GhaleonEB said:Seems TPM was Anonymous' latest target. I was irked enough to start a thread.
TacticalFox88 said:Ghal you okay tonight, lol. Wrong thread.
ToxicAdam said:It's election time. Time to pump up his boy.
I laughed at how put-on that article was when I read it this morning. A year ago he would have railed it as too limited and too reliant on tax cuts.
Bwahaha. Now sure how I managed that one. Fixed.TacticalFox88 said:Ghal you okay tonight, lol. Wrong thread.
That's it, I'm going third party. I gotta draw the line somewhere.PhoenixDark said:They struck at what he holds most dear online. Halo is next
Covenant party.GhaleonEB said:That's it, I'm going third party. I gotta draw the line somewhere.
Screw that, hanging with the Forerunners. Even in death they're still the coolest cats on the galactic streetRustyNails said:Covenant party.
GhaleonEB said:Seems TPM was Anonymous' latest target. I was irked enough to start a thread.
Flying_Phoenix said:Looks like my suspecions were wrong.
The podcast recorded...perfectly fine.
I'll post it up soon!.
traveler said:His boy? Are you referring to the same Obama Krugman has criticized from the beginning of his presidency, even to the point that Krugman has his own professed party saying he's too harsh?
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/08/31/martin-wolf-gets-it/
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/08/22/early-stimulus-worries/
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/08/18/hippie-punching/
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/08/09/the-self-justification-trap/
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/08/07/stuck-in-the-muddle/
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/08/03/hope-is-not-a-plan/
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/08/01/what-would-i-have-done/
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/07/31/linguistic-note/?gwh=DDB2DA5A19E7DD874EF7B79E13004960
etc.
Atilac said:
I sense a lot of hostility.
http://theweek.com/article/index/219104/did-rick-perry-assault-ron-paul-at-the-gop-debateDid Rick Perry 'assault' Ron Paul at the GOP debate?
After the two Texans gunning for the Republican presidential nomination clashed during a commercial break, Paul fans argue that Perry crossed the line
The image: During a commercial break in Wednesday's Republican presidential debate, a photographer captured a seemingly tense exchange between the party's presidential frontrunner, Texas Gov. Rick Perry, and Rep. Ron Paul, also a Texan. (See photo below). Perry walked over to Paul's podium, grabbed the libertarian congressman's forearm with one hand, and pointed in his face with the other. The confrontation came shortly after Paul skewered Perry for writing a letter in the '90s praising then-first lady Hillary Clinton for her health-care reform efforts. Perry subsequently asked Paul to explain a 1987 letter the libertarian wrote to then-President Ronald Reagan saying he was leaving the Republican Party. Paul supporters accused Perry of "assaulting" their candidate during the unintended photo op, but the Perry camp said the pair merely discussed border security in a "very cordial" fashion. For his part, Paul insists that the two did not exchange any "cross words."
The response: It's perfectly understandable that Paul supporters would "go nuclear over this," says Taylor Marsh at her blog. "When a man puts his hands on another man, pointing a finger in his face for emphasis, that's a point when things have crossed the line." Indeed, this looks like a "heated exchange," says Tommy Christopher at Mediaite, "but for all we know, they were discussing the relative merits of My Little Pony and Thundercats." Whatever really happened, says Katrina Trinko at National Review, this was certainly one of the more interesting moments in the debate and it didn't even make it on the air. Most of the other candidates just ignore Paul's broadsides, "but Perry seems unwilling or unable to do that." Take a look for yourself:
SlipperySlope said:I supported the war in Iraq, and won't back away from that stance because it didn't turn out like I'd like.
traveler said:His boy?
etc.
ToxicAdam said:'His boy' is just slang. A tongue-in-cheek euphemism for his preferred candidate. Not meant to imply that he has always been an Obama cheerleader.
Oblivion said:Oh, so you meant "his boy" with a race based connotation, then?
Oblivion said:So, I was watching Martin Bashir's show yesterday, with Ezra Klein guest hosting, and one segment really stood out to me. Ezra goes on to talk about the legislation that Reagan passed, many that would cause him to be cast out of the GOP were he alive today. He spoke for quite a bit about it and followed it up by having the new RNC Chair Reince Preibus on to comment. What I thought was noteworthy was that Preibus didn't even ATTEMPT to dispute any of the stuff Ezra said about Reagan's record. He essentially ignored it entirely. You would think that there would be one or two ways a Republican would get around such inconvenient facts, but he didn't even try.
Which then made me think of Timedog's suggestion about the Dems crafting a bill that would create identical tax brackets and such that were around the time of Reagan. At first I was a little doubtful, but it becomes more and more clear that many of these clowns would have quite a bit of difficulty around it without insulting their (other) god.
Oblivion said:So, I was watching Martin Bashir's show yesterday, with Ezra Klein guest hosting, and one segment really stood out to me. Ezra goes on to talk about the legislation that Reagan passed, many that would cause him to be cast out of the GOP were he alive today. He spoke for quite a bit about it and followed it up by having the new RNC Chair Reince Preibus on to comment. What I thought was noteworthy was that Preibus didn't even ATTEMPT to dispute any of the stuff Ezra said about Reagan's record. He essentially ignored it entirely. You would think that there would be one or two ways a Republican would get around such inconvenient facts, but he didn't even try.
Which then made me think of Timedog's suggestion about the Dems crafting a bill that would create identical tax brackets and such that were around the time of Reagan. At first I was a little doubtful, but it becomes more and more clear that many of these clowns would have quite a bit of difficulty around it without insulting their (other) god.
President Reagan was a big fan of tax credits for the working poor, viewing them as incentives to say on the job. President Clinton, he who carried out his pledge to "end welfare as we know it," declared in 1993 that any American who was willing to work 40 hours a week should be rewarded with resources to keep their families out of poverty, or at least as things turned out, closer to the poverty income cap.
But in the midst of today's anti-tax fervor, few Americans, especially the tea partiers, seem aware of this history in which their hero, Ronald Reagan, played an integral part.
ToxicAdam said:Yes oblivion. That was exactly my intent.
Byakuya769 said:flying_phoenix you sound like a wise-guy!
Who all is featured here?
I'll try to jump on next time. I'm down in Austin with only an iPad at the moment.Flying_Phoenix said:Puddles, Speculawyer, Manos: Hands of Fate.
Flying_Phoenix said:Puddles, Speculawyer, Manos: Hands of Fate.
Flying_Phoenix said:PoliGaf Cast uploaded!
Download it here!
Youtube link up soon.
It starts out a bit rough but than goes on smooth. Trust me its worth a listen.
SlipperySlope said:Ah, Bush...
I forgot what grade I gave Bush earlier in this thread. I agree with some things he did, and disagree with others. I don't play revisionist history. For example, I supported the war in Iraq, and won't back away from that stance because it didn't turn out like I'd like.
The main things I disagree with Bush on are his spending policies. He spent faaar too much.
Flying_Phoenix said:PoliGaf Cast uploaded!
Download it here!
Youtube link up soon.
It starts out a bit rough but than goes on smooth. Trust me its worth a listen.
apana said:Is this shit for real? Herman Cain's 9/11 memorial video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJ-WTFA2vXY
Warning this is disturbing.
um. UM.apana said:Is this shit for real? Herman Cain's 9/11 memorial video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJ-WTFA2vXY
Warning this is disturbing.
Hawkian said:um. UM.
Logical?
It appears to the casual observer as though he is singing about how wonderful America is because we were attacked. I do not quite think this will play well.
I always said I vote pretty much the same as everyone else here. I'm more Scoop Jackson Democrat to an extent.Puddles said:For some reason I thought Manos was a lot more right-wing than he actually is.
Not as assholish enough in my case? lolTacticalFox88 said:You guy's voices don't sound like I 'hear' 'em. lol
What does that mean?TacticalFox88 said:You guy's voices don't sound like I 'hear' 'em. lol
apana said:Is this shit for real? Herman Cain's 9/11 memorial video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJ-WTFA2vXY
Warning this is disturbing.
Not a bad thing, I just pictured your voices sounding different than how I hear 'emFlying_Phoenix said:What does that mean?