hmmm
@RasmussenPoll: Daily Tracking: #Obama: 46%, #Romney: 45%
Ummm....
hmmm
@RasmussenPoll: Daily Tracking: #Obama: 46%, #Romney: 45%
"The Olympics may be over but Paul Ryan could have gotten a gold medal in hypocrisy," a senior administration official told ABC's Jake Tapper. "As someone who spends all day every day railing against government spending, but then secretly seeks millions in funds for pet projects, he is as Washington as it gets."
Last week Romney wanted a truce, Team Obama offers a deal for Romney, doubt he will take it though, heh:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...obama-camp-on-romneys-taxes-lets-make-a-deal/
Obama campaign manager Jim Messina has an offer for Mitt Romney campaign manager Matt Rhoades: Release five years of tax returns and the Obama campaign will stop criticizing or questioning the former Massachusetts governor for not releasing more. (There is no offer to refrain from criticizing the contents of those returns).
Apparently you guys don't listen to conservative talk radio (I can't blame you, guilty pleasure) but there are at least 2 far right conservative elderly groups out there that call the AARP far left. I am sure that in reality, these groups are funded by the Koch brothers or something, but they are incredibly pathetic and weak calls to action. Chuck Woolery shills for one that I can recall.
Why did Romney even comment on how much he paid in taxes percentage-wise? It just brings his tax returns right back into the spotlight.
I watch Fox News sometimes when I'm bored. Blatant propaganda is a pretty interesting thing to watch.
New Jersey's jobless rate rose for the fourth month in a row, to 9.8 percent, up from 9.6 percent in June and from 9.4 percent in July 2011, according to preliminary numbers from the state Department of Labor.
I'm also really baffled by Romney.
He was arguably a more centrist politician -- even a bit Left leaning -- when he was governor of Massachusetts and there was always the thought that once out of the primaries, that him and his campaign would pivot back to more centrist, more inclusive, big-tent politics that would woo independents (this is going back to Etch-a-Sketch Romney (and by the way, I'm hoping the Dem's seize on this like those fucking purple band-aids the Right used to mock Kerry (like if I had a chance to meet Romney, I'd ask for his signature on an Etch-a-Sketch))).
He would have nothing to lose by going more centrist as he wouldn't lose those on the Left, those on the Right have no other choice, and those undecided Independents in the middle can now choose comfortably between 1 and 1.a.
Instead, he seems to be going the other direction.
It's kind of mind boggling.
David Simon said:Its hard to type the same, inevitable response more than once, so let it suffice for me to paste a rejoiner I just threw up on the Wall Street Journal blogsite to similar arguments by some WSJ readers. Ill only add that with regard to the citation of my own income, dont you think it inevitable that if I didnt address that directly, some ad-hominem-loving commentators would rush in to speculate on my own tax history in ridiculous ways? The only way to avoid someone elses caricature of an effette, expense-accounted Hollywood hypocrite is, after all, to live in Baltimore and pay the taxes that you ought as a citizen of a republic. As to there being better reasons to dislike Mitt Romney, I will take your word for that. I encountered the one that I did yesterday and spoke to it.
From the WSJ blogsite:
On the contrary, gentle WSJ reader, I understand perfectly well our tax codes venal dualities. My blog comments were intended, obviously enough, to highlight those inequities, such as they have led to a man who wants to president to stand in public and to defend a tax history that allowed him to contribute far less proportionately to the welfare of this republic than millions of other less fortunate citizens.
I know that Mr. Romney paid his designed share of tax; I also know his share wasnt a fair one. You fellas, on the other hand, seem grandly oblivious to what is so apparent and appalling to millions of your fellow countrymen: That if a man wants something as lofty as the presidency, it might benefit him to realize there is no dignity or honor in publicly professing pride at being part and parcel of a systemic and codified failure by our fmost affluent and entitled citizens to kick in their rightful share.
No, the issue isnt my understanding of the tax code, its your comprehension of republicanism and citizenship, A republic will stand or fall on the willingness of its elites to support and defend the commonweal along with everyone else. I know it will be an epic emotional journey for you gents, but if only for a digressive moment of intellectual curiosity, consider taking your heads out of the stock tables and dividend reports and scanning a few pages of Plato, and if you require a darker vision of our collective future, some Toynbee. Or, if the markets are about to open and youre pressed for time, at least send one of the office staff you know, one of those proles serving his country under a higher tax rate than you to jog over to the Barnes & Noble and snatch up some Cliff Notes.
The sad path of decadent societies is well marked, historically. This one especially so.
I watched Hannity last night for no reason other than being bored and curious. He had some democrat guy on and then right as he introduced him, 3 seconds later he went in to a tirade about how he needs to apologize immediately for all the hate the democrats are spewing.
I laughed.
I see this was posted, but didn't see Romney's response added.
Team Romney: :lol no.
Interesting approach to re-framing the argument. They're trying to make Romney seem even less reasonable by neutralizing his one argument for not releasing them.
Because he has no idea how to run a presidential campaign.
I mean, seriously? You make that much money and proclaim to the world that you pay less than a LOT of middle-class Americans? It makes absolutely no sense. His advisors need to be fired after that, because it gives the democrats easy commercials this year.
Show Romney's income.
Show his tax rate.
Show a reasonable American income, show their tax rate being higher.
Talk about how Romney/Ryan want to raise taxes on middle and lower-class Americans even further.
Fin.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/08/16/us-newjersey-unemployment-idUSBRE87F15K20120816
New Jersey's jobless rate rose for the fourth month in a row, to 9.8 percent, up from 9.6 percent in June and from 9.4 percent in July 2011, according to preliminary numbers from the state Department of Labor.
lol Christie
Any day now that austerity is going to start working.
I was hoping these three months they might pull a win out of there ass. :/first WI senate poll after gop primary
@RasmussenPoll: #Wisconsin Senate: #Thompson 54%, #Baldwin 43%
if that holds, yikes, poor WI dems.
first WI senate poll after gop primary
@RasmussenPoll: #Wisconsin Senate: #Thompson 54%, #Baldwin 43%
if that holds, yikes, poor WI dems.
I was listening to Hannity while in Georgia. A caller calls and the conversation starts off nicely enough. Then it shifted to mitt romney's taxes and then when Hannity realizes that the caller supports Obama, he asks him why he loves Obama so much, yells at him and hangs up the phone.A few years back I had a job where I drove a lot and could list to the radio for much of the day. It was in northern Michigan where all they air for talk radio is right-wing stuff. I could easily sit through stuff like Limbaugh. He says stupid things but I still get the feeling he's more an entertainer than actual crazy person. Sometimes he's pretty funny.
Hannity, on the other hand, is infuriating. Hate is spewing from his mouth ALL the time. It never ceases. He openly lies on a regular basis and hangs up on callers who question him about it.
The amount of sympathy I have towards Wisconsin dems is at an all-time low.
If Romney won the election, him electing his son to an executive position would literally be the LAST thing on my mind.How would you guys feel if after Romney won the election, then he gave a job in the executive to one of his sons? Would there be some serious blow back?
Also if he won again, then I don't see the tax issue fading, especially with tax reform being one of his goals. It would come up again.
How would you guys feel if after Romney won the election, then he gave a job in the executive to one of his sons? Would there be some serious blow back?
Also if he won again, then I don't see the tax issue fading, especially with tax reform being one of his goals. It would come up again.
Yeah.. despite being convinced that we're boned no matter who wins, I still feel a bit better with the Democrats controlling our descent. The idea of Republicans being in charge during difficult/interesting times makes me queasy.If Romney wins the election I would feel BAD period.
I was listening to Hannity while in Georgia. A caller calls and the conversation starts off nicely enough. Then it shifted to mitt romney's taxes and then when Hannity realizes that the caller supports Obama, he asks him why he loves Obama so much, yells at him and hangs up the phone.
New Obama ad about Medicare
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=LJb6tA1cXT0
I was listening to Hannity while in Georgia. A caller calls and the conversation starts off nicely enough. Then it shifted to mitt romney's taxes and then when Hannity realizes that the caller supports Obama, he asks him why he loves Obama so much, yells at him and hangs up the phone.
If Romney won the election, him electing his son to an executive position would literally be the LAST thing on my mind.
I was listening to Hannity while in Georgia. A caller calls and the conversation starts off nicely enough. Then it shifted to mitt romney's taxes and then when Hannity realizes that the caller supports Obama, he asks him why he loves Obama so much, yells at him and hangs up the phone.
(Umm.. weird double-post.. ignore..)
I was hoping these three months they might pull a win out of there ass. :/
Too late now! What are you trying to hide, Tom???
President Obamas team is offering Mitt Romney a deal on taxes: Publicly release five years of returns, and the Obama campaign will drop its insistence for additional tax information.
hmmm
@RasmussenPoll: Daily Tracking: #Obama: 46%, #Romney: 45%
@RasmussenPoll: #Florida Senate: #Nelson (D) 47%, #Mack (R) 40%
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2...y-lets-make-a-deal-on-tax-returns.php?ref=fpa
Oh, they have something.
/tpm-link-self-backpat
They win either way.http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2...y-lets-make-a-deal-on-tax-returns.php?ref=fpa
Oh, they have something.
/tpm-link-self-backpat
Oh you definitely can. In fact that makes it a bit more fascinating sometimes.
Couldn't he just release returns for years that have no relevance to the whole tax return discussion?
Couldn't he just release returns for years that have no relevance to the whole tax return discussion?
It's the definition of strawman argument. They really got nothing other than huff and puff.Funny this happened to me I said something non-offensive to a co-worker and it became, "WHY DO YOU LOVE OBAMA SO MUCH??!!" and I basically said I don't "love him so much", but it was too late.
Any day now that austerity is going to start working.
Funny this happened to me I said something non-offensive to a co-worker and it became, "WHY DO YOU LOVE OBAMA SO MUCH??!!" and I basically said I don't "love him so much", but it was too late.
Romney Advisers: If he loses, blame it on the wifey and kids.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/mckaycoppins/the-romney-family-takes-charge
You know the weird thing about Romney? We all know the basic bumbling idiocy required to maintain Swiss Bank and Cayman Island accounts after you announce you're running for President, but seriously: if he willingly paid everything that a normal wealthy person would be required (without deductions or credits), he'd have an EXTREMELY powerful argument for his platform: "If guys like me weren't paying so much in taxes, we could start new businesses and hire more workers."
But nope. He's paying at or near zero, either one of which is below what people making $30k per year are paying. He has absolutely nothing to stand on.
Jackson50=David Simon confirmed?This response to a guy who brought up the standard "Romney paid what he legally owed; why don't you cut the IRS a check?" talking point is amazing:
I've made essentially this same argument before in bits and pieces, but I've never seen it put together so well. I'm not ashamed to say that I'm going to steal it outright.