Not really. I just hate US politics in general. GOPers have killed my political soul. :-(Are you already stressing over the next campaign?
Not really. I just hate US politics in general. GOPers have killed my political soul. :-(Are you already stressing over the next campaign?
CHEEZMO;76763159 said:I thought everyone knew Assange was a dipshit?
I think people over estimate how much fox really is, on a corporate level part of the conservative movement. I don't think they really care who is president. They just want republicans watching. I don't see them going easy on the Candidates.
Not if the RNC can help it.They'll go easy on the establishment pick, everyone else is fair game.
One important thing that becomes really apparent by studying its history is how the government's spending money is the precursor to its collecting money rather than vice versa.
Pretty much, this is just confirmation.
Not if the RNC can help it.
I am definitely liberal, but looking at that picture, I am not sure how the liberal town lives without ore mining and chemicals.
The town is powered by their own sense of self-satisfaction.I am definitely liberal, but looking at that picture, I am not sure how the liberal town lives without ore mining and chemicals.
I am definitely liberal, but looking at that picture, I am not sure how the liberal town lives without ore mining and chemicals.
I am definitely liberal, but looking at that picture, I am not sure how the liberal town lives without ore mining and chemicals.
My favorite touch are the library hours.
That's the entire point.
Where else am I supposed to rent free movies?Mine too, but it does bring up the question: why does a library exist period?
Where else am I supposed to rent free movies?
Any of NYC-GAF on here? Why is that city so conservative for a big city, a city that is hailed as the mecca of multiculturalism to boot?
Conservative? I don't get you.
Well, where else would the minorities live? In houses?As funny as the image is though, its also pretty unfair. I mean, its not like conservative voters actually believe in the creation of crime-riddled, poverty-stricken run down communities.
Well....okay, I'd like to think that most of them don't
I should say compare to other big cities. Bloomberg and friends are much more to the right as compared to Boston and Chicago officials.
I should say compare to other big cities. Bloomberg and friends are much more to the right as compared to Boston and Chicago officials.
I think the point is that the liberal town would try and keep chemicals and mining and industry further away from residential and urban centers.
See: the Texas fertilizer fiasco
Other than that we had a really bad time in this city back in the 70's, drugs, crime, prostitution, all of it was pretty rampant. Times Square was all sex shops, prostitutes and drug dealers. If you've ever read Batman: Year One, the Gotham City in that book is based off of the NYC of the 70's. That should give you a pretty good idea of what it was like. Because of that you could say the city generally puts pragmatism and getting shit done above all else.
What stopped this? Any real plan or just luck?
^^^With the exception of broken windows and real estate that could apply to almost any city in America.
You said the soda machine exists because of money. I don't accept that. Money is the inevitability of modern society due to technological advancements.
I'm not arguing money didn't come first, only that it would have come no matter what. That's why the history of money is irrelevant in this context (and really, it was a non-sequitor to the discussion anyway).
We got off of the Monetarist Experiment?
I like how there's one chick in that entire panel.
Well, to be fair, you could replace that with PoliGAF regulars and it'd still be an accurate ratio.
I was a little suspicious of the clearly anti-government influence in my economics book for my class this semester. It went out of its way several times to point out the perils of any government intervention, even referencing the horrible inflation that is likely to occur(any day now!) from the Stimulus program in 2008.
Turns out, I've got a Mankiw textbook. That explains it.
I was a little suspicious of the clearly anti-government influence in my economics book for my class this semester. It went out of its way several times to point out the perils of any government intervention, even referencing the horrible inflation that is likely to occur(any day now!) from the Stimulus program in 2008.
Turns out, I've got a Mankiw textbook. That explains it.
One of my textbooks was written by that dipshit Glenn Hubbard.
I like how there's one chick in that entire panel.
Question: I have been dating a wonderful, handsome, caring man for almost three years. The first two years we enjoyed a wonderful life, but lived separately. About three months ago we decided to move in with each other, and two weeks after we moved in together, his sons mother fell into a near coma due to drinking. My boyfriends son (who is 8) is now with us permanently and will probably be for a long time. My issue here is that I am now a mom and wife without the badge. My boyfriend has said hes just not there yet when it comes to marriage and that he would only marry me at this point to make me happy. I feel kinda duped and stuck now that I am living with him and his child and he doesnt see us getting married. Meanwhile, I am very successful professionally, still quite young (30), and a complete catch! How can he not want to marry me!? What should I do?
Answer: Emotions and crap aside, you should only get married if there are tax benefits from doing so, and, given that it sounds like youre both working professionals, there probably arent. Check it:
*graphs*
Dylan Matthews over a Wonkblog has an advice column. It's one of the best things ever.
Also, the mother of your boyfriend’s child, like, just went into a coma, and due to alcoholism, which I assume was not unrelated to why he left her. Maybe give the dude a break.
Question: My 20-year-old son “Ted” has a 19-year-old girlfriend named “Dahlia.” Dahlia is very well-endowed and rarely wears a bra. However, she does wear low-cut clothing and often looks like she’s about to fall out. The dress she was wearing last night was so small on her that it she couldn’t zip it up all the way and she was very close to a nip slip. When she walked in the door she looked at me, shrugged her shoulders and said, “I know this is a low-cut dress,” as if she knew she was coming to my house, knew what my expectations are, but came looking like that anyway. Here’s my problem: She’s going on vacation with us in a week. I don’t want to seem prudish, but I do want to get through to her that this type of dress isn’t appropriate for the places we’ll be going and the people we’ll be seeing. I’ll be asking her before we leave if she’s got bras in her suitcase, and I am ready to leave her behind if she doesn’t or make her go out and buy a few or buy them for her. What do I do? How do I handle this without alienating her but helping her to understand that something that is fine when you’re out clubbing is not fine when you’re trying to make a good impression with your boyfriend’s family?
Answer: Literally everything about this situation is your fault. Allow me to demonstrate with a decision matrix. I assume that Dahlia, ceteris paribus, prefers both to be in your good graces / not be judged by you and to not wear a bra, and that the latter preference is lexically prior to the former, so any situation in which she wears a bra is worse than any situation where she doesn’t, regardless of what it means for her relationship with you. That seems to be born out by her willingness to not wear bras when she knows it makes you uncomfortable.
Dylan Matthews over a Wonkblog has an advice column. It's one of the best things ever.
Yeah, that's a shame. You'll be taught many myths in that class, like the money multiplier.
Buy better bras, Dahlia. I'm sure you'll find some that are comfortable.