• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2013 |OT2| Worth 77% of OT1

Status
Not open for further replies.

Diablos

Member
wolfblitzer.gif


Always love how the woman on the right is smiling until he shows up.
Blitzer: "Why the fuck did we bring this show back?"
 

B-Dubs

No Scrubs
On my phone but new story up at nytimes how boehner will not let country default, and will pass debt ceiling with dem votes.

He's said it a few times in the build up to this. I have a feeling that the debt ceiling will signal the end of the shutdown.
 
T

thepotatoman

Unconfirmed Member
On my phone but new story up at nytimes how boehner will not let country default, and will pass debt ceiling with dem votes.

A lot of people covering it.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/04/us/politics/debt-limit-impasse.html?_r=0

http://www.latimes.com/nation/polit...democrats-debt-limit-20131003,0,1779287.story

http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...f42abc-2c24-11e3-8ade-a1f23cda135e_story.html

Seems likely to see a debt ceiling raise and a continuing shutdown. Republicans can then continue the "not negotiating" narrative by even saying they even gave everything Dems want for the debt ceiling.
 
He's said it a few times in the build up to this. I have a feeling that the debt ceiling will signal the end of the shutdown.
After this is over, any future deals should involve concessions from the Republicans to balance out the costs of their latest PR debacle/stunt.

The research firm IHS Inc. estimates that the shutdown will cost the country $300 million a day in lost economic output. That average will probably grow if the impasse continues, as more agencies run out of saved funds and receive no new appropriations. Moody’s Analytics estimated that a shutdown of three or four weeks would cut 1.4 percentage points from fourth-quarter economic growth and raise the unemployment rate.
(nytimes)
 
A lot of people covering it.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/04/us/politics/debt-limit-impasse.html?_r=0

http://www.latimes.com/nation/polit...democrats-debt-limit-20131003,0,1779287.story

http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...f42abc-2c24-11e3-8ade-a1f23cda135e_story.html

Seems likely to see a debt ceiling raise and a continuing shutdown. Republicans can then continue the "not negotiating" narrative by even saying they even gave everything Dems want for the debt ceiling.

If the GOP raises the debt ceiling without a clean CR, there's even less reason for the Dems to give anything.

The threat of economic destruction is gone and we're closer to January 1st.
 
On my phone but new story up at nytimes how boehner will not let country default, and will pass debt ceiling with dem votes.

Yup, I posted it earlier. Completely knee caps yesterday's stories about using the debt ceiling to extract a big budget deal lol.

Also confirms what Boehner told K/Wall Street folks weeks ago. Nothing to be afraid of, folks. Question is how long does the shutdown last.
 

Averon

Member
Boehner pretty much knee capped Paul Ryan, didn't he?

Ryan was making a big play to use the Debt Ceiling fight to push some elements of his budget.
 
This is what being tone deaf looks like. Video at the link


Congressman Confronts Park Ranger Over Closed WWII Memorial

Conflict over the responsibility for the government shutdown got personal at the World War II Memorial in Washington, D.C. Wednesday when a member of Congress confronted a U.S. Park Service Ranger over access to the closed park land.

The congressman was Randy Neugebauer, a Republican representing Texas. He confronted the ranger in the middle of a crowd of tourists as she was keeping most of the public out of the closed World War II memorial.

The Park Service has been allowing World War II vets who have traveled from all over the country to enter the memorial, even though it's closed during the government shutdown; the rangers say they are exercising their First Amendment rights as they let the veterans in.

But they are keeping the rest of the public out of the facility, which is officially closed. And that did not sit well with the congressman, reported News4's Mark Segraves, who witnessed the confrontation.

"How do you look at them and... deny them access?" said Neugebauer. He, with most House Republicans, had voted early Sunday morning to pass a funding measure that would delay the Affordable Care Act, a vote that set up a showdown with the Senate and President Barack Obama. With the parties unable to agree on how to fund the federal government, non-essential government functions shut down Tuesday.

"It's difficult," responded the Park Service employee.

"Well, it should be difficult," replied the congressman, who was carrying a small American flag in his breast pocket.

"It is difficult," responded the Park Service employee. "I'm sorry, sir."

"The Park Service should be ashamed of themselves," the congressman said.

"I'm not ashamed," replied the ranger.

At that point, a crowd of onlookers got involved. "Ask those questions of the people who aren't passing the budget," shouted a voice from the crowd. "That's who you need to ask these questions to."

"This woman is doing her job, just like me," shouted another. "I'm a 30-year federal veteran -- I'm out of work."

The man, wearing a bicycle helmet, at this point was face to face with the congressman.

"Well, the reason you are is because Mr. Reid decided to shut down the government," responded Neugebauer, referring to the top Senate Democrat.

"No, it's because the government won't do its job and pass a budget," the bicyclist responded.

"The House did its job; it passed appropriations. The Senate hasn't," said another voice from the crowd.

Neugebauer walked away at that point.

The veterans were in D.C. thanks to the Honor Flight Network, which provides flights to D.C. for veterans so they can visit the memorials. Thousands of vets are still on their way to D.C. this weekend as part of the program.
 

Crisco

Banned
At this point, the Senate should just pass a clean bill that raises the debt ceiling, and then go home. There is literally nothing for them to do until Boehner brings the clean CR to the floor. Hell, House democrats should go home too. This is a 100% internal house GOP issue.
 
At this point, the Senate should just pass a clean bill that raises the debt ceiling, and then go home. There is literally nothing for them to do until Boehner brings the clean CR to the floor. Hell, House democrats should go home too. This is a 100% internal house GOP issue.

It would get filibustered.
 
The "Obamacare funding" CR got through the senate without a filibuster. I'm not worried, at all.

I hope the WH takes advantage of anti-Cruz senators more, actually. Let's get some economy bills passed and send them to the House.

Right, because it was a House bill. If the House passes a debt ceiling raise, it won't be filibustered. If the Senate brings one up the day before the debt limit ceiling, it won't get filibustered.

But if Reid brought it up today, it most certainly would.
 
T

thepotatoman

Unconfirmed Member
The "Obamacare funding" CR got through the senate without a filibuster. I'm not worried, at all.

I hope the WH takes advantage of anti-Cruz senators more, actually. Let's get some economy bills passed and send them to the House.

That's because Cruz was using some obscure trick by filibustering the House's bill because he couldn't filibuster the senate bill, or something like that. Doesn't really look too good to filibuster the bill you're supporting.

I'd assume the debt limit is the classical one that's a lot easier to use, but maybe I'm wrong.
 
Right, because it was a House bill. If the House passes a debt ceiling raise, it won't be filibustered. If the Senate brings one up the day before the debt limit ceiling, it won't get filibustered.

But if Reid brought it up today, it most certainly would.

So why not do it?
 
That's because Cruz was using some obscure trick by filibustering the House's bill because he couldn't filibuster the senate bill, or something like that. Doesn't really look too good to filibuster the bill you're supporting.

I'd assume the debt limit is the classical one that's a lot easier to use, but maybe I'm wrong.

I'm assuming that a debt limit increase would require a cloture vote, at which point a filibuster could be implemented. But considering that didn't happen for the CR, I see no reason for it to happen with the debt limit.

Would it be filibuster say...tomorrow if Reid brought it up? Perhaps. But once we get closer to the 17th there's no way the senate will fuck that up.
 
That's because Cruz was using some obscure trick by filibustering the House's bill because he couldn't filibuster the senate bill, or something like that. Doesn't really look too good to filibuster the bill you're supporting.

I'd assume the debt limit is the classical one that's a lot easier to use, but maybe I'm wrong.


IIRC that wasn't a filibuster at all. Republicans just had a certain amount of guaranteed time to comment, and Cruz simply used the entirety of it to grandstand like an asshole. once his time was up, he was kicked from the floor.
 
Pretty sure the clean CR got through because there was a procedural reason that it couldn't be filibustered... ?

First it had to pass cloture though, which is what Cruz wanted to filibuster. Instead only 19 republicans voted against cloture/ie tried to filibuster. I think fewer republicans will vote for the debt ceiling raise, but it'll still be enough to pass it.
 

Tamanon

Banned
The debt ceiling wouldn't be filibustered anyway. Too many GOP Senators hate Ted Cruz and what he created, so they just want to get it over with.
 

pigeon

Banned
Pretty sure the clean CR got through because there was a procedural reason that it couldn't be filibustered... ?

When debate ends on a bill because cloture is invoked, all the amendments on the bill that haven't been voted on yet get an up-or-down vote, and then the bill itself gets an up-or-down vote.

So at the moment that the cloture vote happened, the CR was still a CR that defunds Obamacare, and voting against it would be voting against defunding Obamacare. Now, yes, it would also be voting against amending out defunding Obamacare, but that's the kind of procedural jargon that gets politicians in trouble when they explain it.

After cloture, Reid's amendment on the bill got a vote and passed, taking out the defunding language, and then the amended bill got a vote.

The reason that this doesn't happen more often is that it won't work to drive a bill that you support in its current form, only a bill that you need to amend and then can fully support and that pre-amendment is acceptable to the other side as is.

Also, of course, if the Senate did successfully filibuster the CR, then they would have successfully filibustered the ONLY CR, and the government would shut down because the Republicans filibustered a bill the Republicans passed. There's not a good way around that!
 
Very interesting, from Costa...

Why the leadership is quietly preparing to tie the debt limit to the CR and not sweating the shutdown...

1) clean CR alone wld cause revolt; tying a CR to debt limit package enables a clean CR to pass if part of package

2) Ldrshp allies know GOP can't get concession 4 clean CR, but combo w/, say, med dev tx rpl + tax reform mechanism cld encourage support

A clean CR and debt ceiling raise in the same package would be hilarious. I hope democrats refuse to compromise but that deal plus a repeal of the medical device tax will probably win a lot of democrat support...


edit:
@ByronYork 49s

Growing embrace of theory that Boehner can only afford one cave & remain Speaker. Cave on funding, then cave on debt limit would be deadly…

Goes back to what we've been discussing about Boehner managing failure. If he can't get anything, he'll certainly be forced to pass the debt ceiling raise. But adding a clean CR to that, presumably after failing to secure the medical tax ban (as Costa mentioned above), would end his career.
 

teiresias

Member
Very interesting, from Costa...



A clean CR and debt ceiling raise in the same package would be hilarious. I hope democrats refuse to compromise but that deal plus a repeal of the medical device tax will probably win a lot of democrat support...


edit:


Goes back to what we've been discussing about Boehner managing failure. If he can't get anything, he'll certainly be forced to pass the debt ceiling raise. But adding a clean CR to that, presumably after failing to secure the medical tax ban (as Costa mentioned above), would end his career.

Knowing the bad actors we're dealing with it wouldn't surprise me if that "tax reform mechanism" amendment stipulated any reform had to result in a lower net tax revenue.
 

pigeon

Banned
Meanwhile, some Diablos bait from Fox News:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/int...-support-obamacare-delay-disapprove-congress/

Obama net approval -4 (month over month +10)
Congress net approval -68 (month over month -10)
Obama/health care net approval -6 (month over month +14)
Obama/economy net approval -16 (month over month +7)
Obama/Syria net approval -13 (month over month +18)

Obamacare:
Repeal 30% (-9 since June)
Repeal parts 24% (+5 since June)
Expand 15% (-2 since June)
Leave as is 26% (+7 since June)

Defunding Obamacare: 41% yes, 53% no

Ted Cruz's fauxlibuster: 19% helped his cause, 36% hurt his cause

Who's responsible for the shutdown:
House GOP 25%
Senate GOP 17%
Dems 8%
Obama 24%

An interesting point: most people still think that Obamacare will be bad for them. However, by 1 point, they now think most Americans will benefit from it.
 

Servizio

I don't really need a tag, but I figured I'd get one to make people jealous. Is it working?

The whole middle-class-up economy format is completely ridiculous. Because who’s going to give the middle class their money? The upper class. The middle class isn’t going to make money coming out of nowhere. They’ve got to get a job. And who gives the jobs? The rich people. So if you take all the rich people’s money, they’re not going to be able to give anybody a job. Just it’s so backwards. He keeps talking about a strong middle class. I don’t want a strong middle class. I want to make all the middle class rich people, because then you’ve got even more rich people who can give more jobs. It’s like a–it’s just ridiculous.
(Tea Party man, Raleigh)

A thread on this PDF might be fun.
 
Meanwhile, some Diablos bait from Fox News:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/int...-support-obamacare-delay-disapprove-congress/

Obama net approval -4 (month over month +10)
Congress net approval -68 (month over month -10)
Obama/health care net approval -6 (month over month +14)
Obama/economy net approval -16 (month over month +7)
Obama/Syria net approval -13 (month over month +18)

Obamacare:
Repeal 30% (-9 since June)
Repeal parts 24% (+5 since June)
Expand 15% (-2 since June)
Leave as is 26% (+7 since June)

Defunding Obamacare: 41% yes, 53% no

Ted Cruz's fauxlibuster: 19% helped his cause, 36% hurt his cause

Who's responsible for the shutdown:
House GOP 25%
Senate GOP 17%
Dems 8%
Obama 24%

An interesting point: most people still think that Obamacare will be bad for them. However, by 1 point, they now think most Americans will benefit from it.

So...42% blame republicans, 32% blame democrats. But if I had to bet I'd say they'll advertise it as "Americans blame the House GOP more than Obama by only 1%"
 

Diablos

Member
Meanwhile, some Diablos bait from Fox News:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/int...-support-obamacare-delay-disapprove-congress/

Obama net approval -4 (month over month +10)
Congress net approval -68 (month over month -10)
Obama/health care net approval -6 (month over month +14)
Obama/economy net approval -16 (month over month +7)
Obama/Syria net approval -13 (month over month +18)

Obamacare:
Repeal 30% (-9 since June)
Repeal parts 24% (+5 since June)
Expand 15% (-2 since June)
Leave as is 26% (+7 since June)

Defunding Obamacare: 41% yes, 53% no

Ted Cruz's fauxlibuster: 19% helped his cause, 36% hurt his cause

Who's responsible for the shutdown:
House GOP 25%
Senate GOP 17%
Dems 8%
Obama 24%

An interesting point: most people still think that Obamacare will be bad for them. However, by 1 point, they now think most Americans will benefit from it.
Brah, it is a Faux News poll.

Not really fretting.

41% want Obamacare the same or EXPANDED! Neat!
 

Karakand

Member
A thread on this PDF might be fun.

Look at this dork who thinks capitalism is a social relation instead of just arbitrarily organizing people by how much money they make, it's not like our mode of production has fluctuating prices and self-consumes every so often or anything.
 
And on Wednesday at a private luncheon, several Senate Republicans — Dan Coats of Indiana, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire — assailed Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, who has led the movement to block funding for the health law.

Ms. Ayotte was especially furious, according to two people present, and waved a printout from a conservative group friendly to Mr. Cruz attacking 25 of his fellow Republican senators for supporting a procedural vote that the group counted as support of the health law.

Ms. Ayotte asked Mr. Cruz to disavow the group’s effort and demanded he explain his strategy. When he did not, several other senators — including Mr. Johnson, Mr. Coats and even Mitch McConnell, the minority leader — joined in the criticism of Mr. Cruz.

“It just started a lynch mob,” said a senator who was present.

Despite the uproar, Mr. Cruz did not offer a plan for how his plan for how his party could prevail in the shutdown battle and suggested his colleagues were defeatists.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/04/us/politics/gop-elders-see-liabilities-in-shutdown.html

The disintegration of the modern GOP is happening. It's clear that the frustration over the antics of the Tea Party is now a huge problem with the GOP. Most Tea Partiers have no knowledge or comprehension of politics and think that strategies like the shutdown will work.
 

Piecake

Member
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/04/us/politics/gop-elders-see-liabilities-in-shutdown.html

The disintegration of the modern GOP is happening. It's clear that the frustration over the antics of the Tea Party is now a huge problem with the GOP. Most Tea Partiers have no knowledge or comprehension of politics and think that strategies like the shutdown will work.

I thought this article summed it up nicely

Christopher Parker and Matt Barreto, who teach political science at the University of Washington, recently published “Change They Can’t Believe In: The Tea Party and Reactionary Politics in America.” They contend that there are two major strands of conservatism in America: what they call “non Tea Party,” “traditional” or “real” conservatism; and what they describe as “Tea Party,” “reactionary” or “pseudo-conservatism.”

In response to my inquiry, Parker wrote in an e-mail:

"Ultimately, a conservative — in the classical sense — wishes to preserve a stable society. Of course, this includes stable institutions and observing the rule of law. For these reasons (and several more), a conservative prefers evolutionary, more incremental change to revolutionary change: revolutionary change threatens the stability conservatives seek to conserve. Hence, conservatives reluctantly accept change — so long as it isn’t revolutionary. They do so for the sake of stability and order. Moreover, for the sake of order and stability, real conservatives are amenable to political compromise with their opponents."

Conversely, according to Parker, reactionary conservatives are backwards looking, generally fearful of losing their way of life in a wave of social change. To preserve their group’s social status, they’re willing to undermine long-established norms and institutions — including the law. They see political differences as a war of good versus evil in which their opponents are their enemies. For them, compromise is commensurate with defeat — not political expediency. They believe social change is subversive to the America with which they’ve become familiar, i.e., white, mainly male, Protestant, native born, straight. “Real Americans,” in other words.

http://www.minnpost.com/eric-black-ink/2013/10/tea-party-ism-conservative
 
This was posted in the shutdown thread, but it's pretty interesting. CSPAN2 is hosting a panel on Health Care (and the ACA) with industry stakeholder representatives (Hospitals, Pharmaceuticals, Nurse Practitioners, Laboratories, Clinics, American Cancer Society)

Pretty good stuff. Calm, honest discussion without grandstanding or politicizing:
http://www.c-span.org/Live-Video/C-SPAN2/

Part 2 is finished, now they're onto Part 3 (Business and Insurance representatives).
 

The Technomancer

card-carrying scientician
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/04/us/politics/gop-elders-see-liabilities-in-shutdown.html

The disintegration of the modern GOP is happening. It's clear that the frustration over the antics of the Tea Party is now a huge problem with the GOP. Most Tea Partiers have no knowledge or comprehension of politics and think that strategies like the shutdown will work.
I hope and pray that the rise of the Tea Party will ultimately be a good thing as it reveals the absolutely insane underbelly that's been building so we can stab it through the heart and throw holy water on it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom