Hes not middle class.reilo said:"Obama didn't win Joe the Plumber over. Is that a bigger systematic problem for Obama and his inability to win over white, middle-class voters in those swing-states?"
Hey media: Fuck you.
Hes not middle class.reilo said:"Obama didn't win Joe the Plumber over. Is that a bigger systematic problem for Obama and his inability to win over white, middle-class voters in those swing-states?"
Hey media: Fuck you.
Fragamemnon said:DOW/Nikkei tanking has a lot less to do with the "financial crisis" as it does with the fact that consumer spending and manufacturing numbers have been absolutely terrible for a while now. That's something that was happened before Lehman went under, triggering the huge LIBOR rates and TED spreads that showed that the credit market was seizing.
at least that's my understanding of things from reading some posters at CR
CharlieDigital said:Taxes are always applied to net income after deductions (expenses, wages, etc).
The 39% would only be applied to any money he earns above $250,000. So if he makes a net profit of $250,001, the 39% would only be applied to the $1 above $250,000.
As I posted previously:
And yeah, the media does a great disservice to the public by not explaining how the progressive tax brackets work. "Punishing success" is so far from the truth, I don't understand how people even use that argument against a higher top tier tax bracket. No person becomes wealthy in a vacuum; each business needs well educated and well trained employees via the public education system. Each business needs a base of customers who can pay for the services or goods and for this you need a strong middle class. Each business needs infrastructure like roads, trains and bridges so that it can attract talented individuals no matter where they live in respect to the business.
People who make more rightly have a greater responsibility to feed into the system since they reap the biggest benefit from government spending indirectly.
DigitalSoul said:Those are son unflattering photos of McCain you all keep posting.
CharlieDigital said:Taxes are always applied to net income after deductions (expenses, wages, etc).
The 39% would only be applied to any money he earns above $250,000. So if he makes a net profit of $250,001, the 39% would only be applied to the $1 above $250,000.
As I posted previously:
And yeah, the media does a great disservice to the public by not explaining how the progressive tax brackets work. "Punishing success" is so far from the truth, I don't understand how people even use that argument against a higher top tier tax bracket. No person becomes wealthy in a vacuum; each business needs well educated and well trained employees via the public education system. Each business needs a base of customers who can pay for the services or goods and for this you need a strong middle class. Each business needs infrastructure like roads, trains and bridges so that it can attract talented individuals no matter where they live in respect to the business.
People who make more rightly have a greater responsibility to feed into the system since they reap the biggest benefit from government spending indirectly.
If (more like when at this point -- am I right!?) Obama wins, do you think this will be a narrative on November 5th? "Sure, he won. But why couldn't he win with a bigger margin? He's really going to have his work cut out for him in 2012 if he can't convince these working-class white voters throughout the next four years."Tobor said:WHY CANT OBAMA CLOSE THE DEAL??
Ventron said:That's true, yes...
I'm just concerned whether the media or Obama supporters will try to dig up dirt on this guy and make it public. I hope they're not going to ruin this guy's life all in the name of slightly hurting McCain's debate rhetoric. If so, they're no better than Scientologists.
*** The McCain camps memo: So what did a Minnesota focus group of voters -- that McCains campaign conducted regarding last nights debate -- say? Well, NBC News has obtained a strategy memo about the findings (some good, some bad, and some obvious). One conclusion from it on health care is an excellent example of how Obama has just dominated an issue that has flown under the media's radar: The respondents believed Obama's interpretation of McCain's health care plan more so than McCains interpretation. And thats not a good sign when your opponent has framed your health care plan for you -- but that's exactly what's happened. Other intel the McCain camp received from their dial test: Joe the plumber didn't play as well as hoped (same in media focus groups); Obama successfully deflected Ayers, and there now might not be enough time to fully prosecute the associations strategy. In the final analysis, the campaign is being advised that Obama's experience and readiness is still something that can be exploited by McCain.
lawblob said:He should have thought about that before wagging his tongue all over the place like Michael Jordan.
PrivateWHudson said:The chance that Joe's plumbing will ever PROFIT >$250K is just ridiculous. At some point, he may turn a profit, but Joe's Plumbing will probably increase Joe's salary, his employee's salary, upgrade facilities, buy new tools...ect.
Sleeker said:Hillary Clinton watching 3rd Debate:
![]()
That woman is always right near her.
Has anyone heard the rumors of hil being a closeted lesbian?
In the final analysis, the campaign is being advised that Obama's experience and readiness is still something that can be exploited by McCain.
lawblob said:Did anyone notice Romney rushing up to the stage to give McCain a thumbs up immediate following the debate?
Is Mittens some puppet adviser we don't know about?
$250K/yr in PROFITS could afford you quite a nice home in Malibu and a nice two-seater to boot. SHIT.Fragamemnon said:Furthermore, if he can claim taxable income over $250K with a plumbing business and a *good* accountant, then to be honest he's doing really well for himself and would properly fall into that "5%" hole of small businesses that Obama talks about that will get a tax increase. Making so much money that you have to claim above that amount with a good accountant as a small business is exceedingly rare, thanks to the many tax breaks in place.
I think the belief was simply that the right believes there's substance to these attacks, and that they haven't achieved mainstream scrutiny, and by McCain himself slinging the mud, it will raise doubts about Obama -- regardless of the validity of the claims. Unfortunately for them, though, they don't seem to realize the precarious position they're in. First of all, the attacks aren't as substantive as they've deluded themselves into believing. Second of all, McCain's negative numbers are too high for people to hear this stuff and suddenly think that this dubious attack is more important than the economy.reilo said:Why did all those people that wanted McCain to go on the attack believe that Obama would just sit back and take all the bullshit and not fight back?
Did his advisers really think that Obama - after debating for over 45 times against much more eloquent and tougher debaters with the likes of Hillary Clinton - was really just going to go, "oh shucks, I can't defend myself now against baseless and unfound accusations!"??
Fragamemnon said:I think the key will be for the Democrats to work the middle ground as the rule, and only do the party line stuff in the case where the GOP really is impossible to work with (I expect taxes, labor, and health care to be the big party line votes early on. The EFCA in particular is going to have conservatives howling in terror.).
PrivateWHudson said:Charlie, I agree with you're point about the progressive tax, but what I'm really getting at is that Obama flubbed when talking about his own policy, and this flub leads to everyone thinking that any small business with revenue of >$250K will be affected.
The chance that Joe's plumbing will ever PROFIT >$250K is just ridiculous. At some point, he may turn a profit, but Joe's Plumbing will probably increase Joe's salary, his employee's salary, upgrade facilities, buy new tools...ect.
I think it's a shame that no-one (Obama, McCain, or Joe) realizes this.
ToxicAdam said:I'm confused on this Joe the Plumber shit. Did he own a business that he purchased for 250k? Have a business that had revenues of 250k or profitted 250k annually? Because all three are vastly different
Fragamemnon said:My understanding is that he wanted to buy the company he worked for at a value over 250K, and that the business had revenues or planned revenues over 250k, but that really there was no way it was going to pull in a profit of over 250k a year.
So Joe is just another man from Toledo that doesn't get taxes. Actually, Joe has some tax issues in general:
"According to Lucas County, Ohio court records Samuel J. Wurzelbacher lives at 355 Shrewsbury Street. The state of Ohio took out a judgment against him for $1,182.98 in unpaid income taxes on 2007. Samuel J. Wurzelbacher also was involved in divorce proceedings in 2006 (with the Holland address) and previously in 1997, when he had an Arizona address."
MrHicks said:why are americans so angry at taxes?
the country is going bankrupt with massive debts and they wanna LOWER taxes?
a country needs money to survive
if you live in a country and enjoy all its benefits pay your fair share or GTFO
ToxicAdam said:Now you know how people who are right-leaning feel when they post in this thread.
CharlieDigital said:Well, it's hard to gauge whether Obama does or not since he was working with Joe on a pure numbers perspective. If Joe is asking about taxes for those making above $250,000, the assumption is that he's talking about net profits since asking a tax question using gross profits makes no sense as there are any variable number of deductions which need to be made; in essence, if the discussion was based on gross profit, no one would be able to answer the question of "What does it mean for me?" since it doesn't take into account capital expenditures.
Since they started interviewing him, the Dow went from +70 to -40.Red Blaster said:Listening to Joe The Plumber on MSNBC. Guy's borderline retarded. "We brought freedom to Iraq! Freedom!"
PrivateWHudson said:I heard some lady on Sean Hannity call in and said that her business makes over $250K, but after all of the expenses, it only makes enough for the business to pay her $40K/year, and wants to know why Obama wants to punish her.
reilo said:Let's do some quick math:
$250,000 profits per year.
$100,000 per year for your home including financing [over 30 years, that's a $3mil home!].
$25,000 per year for car payments including financing [over 4 years, that's a $100k car!].
That leaves you with: $125,000/yr or $10,400/mo in money to spend on whatever the hell you want. The average American probably makes $10,000 over a period of 6 months.
Dude. I want to be able to make $250,000 in profits a year.
Red Blaster said:Listening to Joe The Plumber on MSNBC. Guy's borderline retarded. "We brought freedom to Iraq! Freedom!"
Linda Howe, executive director of the Lucas County Board of Elections, said a Samuel Joseph Worzelbacher, whose address and age match Joe the Plumbers, registered in Lucas County on Sept. 10, 1992. He voted in his first primary on March 4, 2008, registering as a Republican.
No. I'm thinking PROFITS after the business has paid off all their expenses. You're thinking REVENUE.PrivateWHudson said:Reilo, you're still thinking about the person, and not the business. The business could pay the owner $250K/year and still not make a profit and not be affected by Obama's plan. It would only be businesses that have such excess profits that the business can't burn it off in salaries and expansion that it would have to just invest the profits.
Because Rasmussen's party ID system is whacked and they're using numbers too close to 2004?Soybean said:Why aren't we exploding over the Rasmussen numbers. They must've leaked last night I guess.
Saint Gregory said:Most embarrassing driveway press conference since T.O.
:lolPrivateWHudson said:I heard some lady on Sean Hannity call in and said that her business makes over $250K, but after all of the expenses, it only makes enough for the business to pay her $40K/year, and wants to know why Obama wants to punish her.
Y2Kev said:http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3186/2939110809_948906d735_o.jpg
:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol