bgassassin
Member
Vestal said:Not sure if its posted yet..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeMypXCUWMw&
Answer comparison.. I mean damn!
O_O
I saw some people say SNL used unedited parody, but wow.
Vestal said:Not sure if its posted yet..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeMypXCUWMw&
Answer comparison.. I mean damn!
For some reason, hearing this makes me very happy. Palin ridicule is reaching critical mass.SpeedingUptoStop said:The Palin couric interview critical analysis made my local news tonight, god damn.
It will certainly be interesting to see how the debate goes this week, and especially the reactions to it.SpeedingUptoStop said:The Palin couric interview critical analysis made my local news tonight, god damn.
SpeedingUptoStop said:The Palin couric interview critical analysis made my local news tonight, god damn.
Extollere said:Anyone know if Obama is planning on coming to San Diego, or is that a lost cause?
Watching her try to talk down Obama is gonna have a worse effect than McCain's condescending debate attitude.:lolAgent Icebeezy said:Yeah, she is being painted as an idiot everywhere. The thing about throwing a woman or a black man up to this task is that since you are chartering new ground, you can't just put anyone up there, because if they are a fuck up, its going to be a long time before another like them comes and takes their place as a viable candidate. There are much better women in the GOP now that should have gone before Palin if they were going to pick a woman. I think this Couric interview is going to be her lasting legacy unless she somehow tops it on Thursday. Even then, I think that her shouting down Obama in the VP debate is largely going to fall to the wayside because a lot of people are going to frankly know she is just spouting what she is being told to say.
electricpirate said:What prompted the thread name change?
Freedom = $1.05 said:Cali is guaranteed. He's not wasting his time at a place he has locked down. Sorry :/
electricpirate said:What prompted the thread name change?
Juice said:Everyone freaking out that McCain had won the debate.
I don't think it was totally unfair to think so. He won in the majority of pundit's eyes and probably on a reasonable issues score card.
The fact he looked like a sweaty, hunchy, angry nixon definitely lost it for him in the public's eyes, though.
Cheebs said:It's nothing new. Look at the ENDLESS books that still come out to this day of pictures of JFK. If GAF and the internet were around in '60 this thread would be endless pictures of JFK and Jackie.
Politics has always been like this when its a younger good looking candidate and spouse.
There were a bunch of posters saying post debate and during how Mccain had cleaned Obama's clock.electricpirate said:What prompted the thread name change?
electricpirate said:What prompted the thread name change?
YES!!Deus Ex Machina said:
Deus Ex Machina said:
-can you trust this man? shit yes you can what the fuck kind of question is that you dumb bitch
Really? I wasn't online during or shortly after the debates, and missed a good chunk of the debate when it aired, but the immediate post debate spin seemed to be leaning in the direction of stating that, at worst, it was a tie or a mild win for McCain. Even conceding that, though, the pundits seemed quick to point out that McCain had more to prove, and even that would be interpreted as a win for Obama in the public's eye. People were freaking out here?FlightOfHeaven said:GAF predicted, and thought, that McCain owned the debate in the public eye.
Obama's ratings shot up.
Agent Icebeezy said:Yeah, she is being painted as an idiot everywhere. The thing about throwing a woman or a black man up to this task is that since you are chartering new ground, you can't just put anyone up there, because if they are a fuck up, its going to be a long time before another like them comes and takes their place as a viable candidate. There are much better women in the GOP now that should have gone before Palin if they were going to pick a woman. I think this Couric interview is going to be her lasting legacy unless she somehow tops it on Thursday. Even then, I think that her shouting down Obama in the VP debate is largely going to fall to the wayside because a lot of people are going to frankly know she is just spouting what she is being told to say.
Steve Youngblood said:Really? I wasn't online during or shortly after the debates, and missed a good chunk of the debate when it aired, but the immediate post debate spin seemed to be leaning in the direction of stating that, at worst, it was a tie or a mild win for McCain. Even conceding that, though, the pundits seemed quick to point out that McCain had more to prove, and even that would be interpreted as a win for Obama in the public's eye. People were freaking out here.
electricpirate said:What prompted the thread name change?
Really? I wasn't online during or shortly after the debates, and missed a good chunk of the debate when it aired, but the immediate post debate spin seemed to be leaning in the direction of stating that, at worst, it was a tie or a mild win for McCain. Even conceding that, though, the pundits seemed quick to point out that McCain had more to prove, and even that would be interpreted as a win for Obama in the public's eye. People were freaking out here?
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/29/opinion/29kristol.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print&oref=sloginHow McCain Wins
By William Kristol
John McCain is on course to lose the presidential election to Barack Obama. Can he turn it around, and surge to victory?
He has a chance. But only if he overrules those of his aides who are trapped by conventional wisdom, huddled in a defensive crouch and overcome by ideological timidity.
....
The core case against Obama is pretty simple: hes too liberal. A few months ago I asked one of McCains aides what aspect of Obamas liberalism they thought they could most effectively exploit. He looked at me as if I were a simpleton, and patiently explained that talking about conservatism and liberalism was so old-fashioned.
Maybe. But the fact is the only Democrats to win the presidency in the past 40 years Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton distanced themselves from liberal orthodoxy. Obama is, by contrast, a garden-variety liberal. He also has radical associates in his past.
The most famous of these is the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, and I wonder if Obama may have inadvertently set the stage for the McCain team to reintroduce him to the American public. On Saturday, Obama criticized McCain for never using in the debate Friday night the words middle class. The Obama campaign even released an advertisement trumpeting McCains omission.
The McCain campaign might consider responding by calling attention to Chapter 14 of Obamas eloquent memoir, Dreams From My Father. There Obama quotes from the brochure of Reverend Wrights church a passage entitled A Disavowal of the Pursuit of Middleclassness.
So when Biden goes on about the middle class on Thursday, Palin might ask Biden when Obama flip-flopped on Middleclassness.
jesus, why does this 8 year old footage seem so old? Were TV cameras really this bad 8 year ago? wtf? I'm getting old, gaf.TDG said:By the way, people who were surprised about McCain's combativeness in the debate: here's a goldie oldie for you.
I'm really liking seeing the older stuff pop up on youtube. I'm definitely hoping that the 2000 Clinton-Lazlo debate appears at some point.SpeedingUptoStop said:jesus, why does this 8 year old footage seem so old? Were TV cameras really this bad 8 year ago? wtf? I'm getting old, gaf.
Door2Dawn said:Damn McCain was getting all up in bushes ass :lol
He had a god damned brochure ready! Debating with props! wtf, mccain of 8 years ago oughta be running now. :[Door2Dawn said:Damn McCain was getting all up in bushes ass :lol
Stupid.Rhindle said:We might as well acknowledge where this is headed in the next 30 days:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/29/opinion/29kristol.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin
Rhindle said:We might as well acknowledge where this is headed in the next 30 days:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/29/opinion/29kristol.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin
Rhindle said:We might as well acknowledge where this is headed in the next 30 days:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/29/opinion/29kristol.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin
ha haha, save.SpeedingUptoStop said:
Rhindle said:We might as well acknowledge where this is headed in the next 30 days:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/29/opinion/29kristol.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin
Rhindle said:We might as well acknowledge where this is headed in the next 30 days:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/29/opinion/29kristol.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin
Holy shit WHAT? McCain has been dropping one hail Mary after another, from Palin to his campaign "suspension" to trying to back out of the debate. Kristol is totally divorced from reality here.But only if he overrules those of his aides who are trapped by conventional wisdom
Agent Icebeezy said:A Disavowal of the Pursuit of Middleclassness teaches against materialistic cravings :lol
Rhindle said:We might as well acknowledge where this is headed in the next 30 days:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/29/opinion/29kristol.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin
Rhindle said:We might as well acknowledge where this is headed in the next 30 days:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/29/opinion/29kristol.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin
seriouslyFlightOfHeaven said:What happened to McCain? That McCain was awesome.
Hmm... nothing's working... down big in the polls... hey, let's go back to the same tired line of attack that we've used for years!Rhindle said:We might as well acknowledge where this is headed in the next 30 days:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/29/opinion/29kristol.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin
Rhindle said:We might as well acknowledge where this is headed in the next 30 days:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/29/opinion/29kristol.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin
Imm0rt4l said:seriously
electricpirate said:Has Kristol been right about anything ever?