Thunder Monkey
Banned
Maybe he should get back in the kitchen?TDG said:Sexist comment.
Maybe he should get back in the kitchen?TDG said:Sexist comment.
SEGA SAMMY said:Tax cuts for 95% of working families, I don't think so...Obama has already stated that the Bush tax cuts were irresponsible, and that tax rate was too low. Yes, the cuts went up too high for some incomes, but they came here to me on the south side too.... How is he going to pay for the R+D to be able to get rid of middle east foreign oil dependency in 10 years (he hasn't even told anyone exactly how this can even be done) and cut 95% of working peoples taxes? He will need to saddle small businesses and corporations with huge taxes in a weak economy to even come close.
Not even close.Korranator said:Not just Liberal, but damn near socialist.
the way i remember it, you framed both Obama and MccCain as being similar because they 'both agree with each other on what has to be done, they just disagree on how to do it'.UltimaKilo said:I never mentioned Scorcho being blinded by his love of Obama, I was referencing something he said about me "knowing it all".
Jason's Ultimatum said:Please tell me you're a joke character. You do realize he's going to raise taxes on income over $250,000 right? Ending the Iraq war will save us at least $10 billion.
SEGA SAMMY said:Tax cuts for 95% of working families, I don't think so...Obama has already stated that the Bush tax cuts were irresponsible, and that tax rate was too low. Yes, the cuts went up too high for some incomes, but they came here to me on the south side too.... How is he going to pay for the R+D to be able to get rid of middle east foreign oil dependency in 10 years (he hasn't even told anyone exactly how this can even be done) and cut 95% of working peoples taxes? He will need to saddle small businesses and corporations with huge taxes in a weak economy to even come close.
reilo said:$10billion? Yeah, PER MONTH.
I mentioned earlier that Gov. Palin is in the thick of her own very Bush era scandal over her attempts to have her ex-brother-in-law fired as a state trooper, using her clout as governor. Now we've learned she's invoked the Alaska version of executive privilege to withhold emails dealing with the case. Our report on the latest on the case will be coming up shortly.
Tamanon said:From TPM
Well....I guess she does have some EXPERIENCE that could be useful for the Presidency
APF said:I think a "secret" point to note is, Palin doesn't need to compete with Biden's control of, say, FP issues in a debate to come across as credible / to succeed. She just needs to hold fast to whatever the provided talking points are, and not get blindsided. Remember, debates in this country are shallow and meaningless theater where the important things are how much you sweat sigh or roll your eyes.
SEGA SAMMY said:Tax cuts for 95% of working families, I don't think so...Obama has already stated that the Bush tax cuts were irresponsible, and that tax rate was too low. Yes, the cuts went up too high for some incomes, but they came here to me on the south side too.... How is he going to pay for the R+D to be able to get rid of middle east foreign oil dependency in 10 years (he hasn't even told anyone exactly how this can even be done) and cut 95% of working peoples taxes? He will need to saddle small businesses and corporations with huge taxes in a weak economy to even come close.
Gaborn said:
grandjedi6 said:grandjedi6's "How to tell who's a troll" checklist:
(I) Are they reposting stupid talking points?
(II) Are they not responding to other poster's comments or critism?
(III) Do they have a non-existant or negative posting history of the discussion type?
Looks like we have a live one here guys!
grandjedi6 said:grandjedi6's "How to tell who's a troll" checklist:
Are they reposting stupid talking points?
Are they not responding to other poster's comments or critism?
Do they have a non-existant or negative posting history of the discussion type?
Looks like we have a live one here guys!
woxel1 said:
reilo said:I thought innocent people had nothing to hide?
yeaaaaaaaah....HocusPocus said:Palin is an excellent choice, and I only wish I could vote for her for President instead of just VP.
woxel1 said:
Gaborn said:You do realize that most any lawyer would tell a client to reveal the bare minimum of information they're required to, right?
thekad said:Governor.
Gaborn said:You do realize that most any lawyer would tell a client to reveal the bare minimum of information they're required to, right?
grandjedi6 said:grandjedi6's "How to tell who's a troll" checklist:
(I) Are they reposting stupid talking points?
(II) Are they not responding to other poster's comments or critism?
(III) Do they have a non-existant or negative posting history of the discussion type?
scorcho said:the way i remember it, you framed both Obama and MccCain as being similar because they 'both agree with each other on what has to be done, they just disagree on how to do it'.
now does he read detailed expositions on the candidates in papers like the NYT to educate him on each candidates platform? says Ultimakilo - 'Don't have to, I've worked for their campaigns to familiarize myself with them.' besides - he believes that NYT is a partisan paper and as such unworthy of his eyes.
Macam was right - i was too generous before.
Can you pass the good shit please? I'm all out.HocusPocus said:Palin is an excellent choice, and I only wish I could vote for her for President instead of just VP.
Gaborn said:And...? Clinton wasn't exactly forthcoming in his various investigations and probes (whether they were fair or not).
UltimaKilo said:And it's true... They both agree on what needs to be done because they both have the American perspective. I can tell you that people in Spain believe that the U.S. has to radically change. And I'm happy to be one of the only people in this Obama thread that has yet to resort to insults, it tells a lot about the character of a person.
speculawyer said::lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol
Gaborn said:And...? Clinton wasn't exactly forthcoming in his various investigations and probes (whether they were fair or not).
That's a hard pill to swallow.grandjedi6 said:
pxleyes said:Can you pass the good shit please? I'm all out.
grandjedi6 said:
Are you claiming all Obama supporters are potheads? Even though Palin admitted to inhaling herself?HocusPocus said:I'd be out too if I was ObamaBot .
reilo said:There's a difference between using the power of your office to hide information when you are under investigation, and invoking the fifth amendment to protect yourself in court?
One is directly interfering with an investigation. Can you guess which?
UltimaKilo said:And it's true... They both agree on what needs to be done because they both have the American perspective. I can tell you that people in Spain believe that the U.S. has to radically change. And I'm happy to be one of the only people in this Obama thread that has yet to resort to insults, it tells a lot about the character of a person.
Vinzer Deling said:http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np
Fiscal
Year Year Ending National Debt Deficit
FY1993 09/30/1993 $4.411488 trillion
FY1994 09/30/1994 $4.692749 trillion $281.26 billion
FY1995 09/29/1995 $4.973982 trillion $281.23 billion
FY1996 09/30/1996 $5.224810 trillion $250.83 billion
FY1997 09/30/1997 $5.413146 trillion $188.34 billion
FY1998 09/30/1998 $5.526193 trillion $113.05 billion
FY1999 09/30/1999 $5.656270 trillion $130.08 billion
FY2000 09/29/2000 $5.674178 trillion $17.91 billion
FY2001 09/28/2001 $5.807463 trillion $133.29 billion
Where's the magical surplus?
Gaborn said:Sure, but there are statutes and precedents that define what is private and what is public information, and what is capable of being subpoenaed and what is not capable of being subpoenaed for public officials. Is Palin following the law in the course of this investigation or not? if she is, then you're bitching for nothing. If she isn't she should be removed from office immediately for obstruction of justice.
yeah its getting kinda ridiculous. Im expecting to see rudy pop out of nowhere.ronito said:Can we get a section for 9/11 and POW mention counts?
reilo said:Ask yourself this: If there was a law that protected the emails that officials wrote, then would she have to invoke executive privilege? As far as I am concerned, and PUBLIC official voted into power by the voting PUBLIC requires a certain level of transparency.
Wow, this is awkward.Stoney Mason said:Speaking of interviews did anyone catch this beauty yesterday.
http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1836909,00.html
Gaborn said:How about you answer my question before I start asking myself new questions?
He's a pundit though, not a true journalist. Just the same as O'Reilly.DancingJesus said:God Olbermann is a bit too much... I mean there's a line you gotta draw, your a professional. News should be reported without bias, this guy strokes Obama's cock at every given chance.
DancingJesus said:God Olbermann is a bit too much... I mean there's a line you gotta draw, your a professional. News should be reported without bias, this guy strokes Obama's cock at every given chance.