RustyNails
Member
Silly you, only old white men can wear cowboy hats.I love all these republicans in cowboy hats making fun of someone in a cowboy hat.
Silly you, only old white men can wear cowboy hats.I love all these republicans in cowboy hats making fun of someone in a cowboy hat.
Sorry Texas, you didn't come up with the Cowboy
Silly you, only old white men can wear cowboy hats.
Warren - not an actual picture
Warren - not an actual picture
Wilson - you're wearing a fucking cowboy hat in your fucking profile picture you fucking dunce
I always knew the GOP was a party of boys, not men.Cow-BOY
Fixed. Can't ignore the race angle.I love all these republicans in cowboy hats making fun of a black woman in a cowboy hat.
Why do men in cowboy hats keep making fun of women in cowboy hats?
Like that dumbass literally is wearing one on his profipe pic
Because she's black.
the republican talk heads are comparing her to a crazed maxine waters. that party is so aggressively racist, its humorous how cartoony it is.
the republican talk heads are comparing her to a crazed maxine waters. that party is so aggressively racist, its humorous how cartoony it is.
republican white men (and women too) have a special type of hatred for black women. considering michelle was never president, the shit they said about her and her daughters was far worse than barack.Part of the reason why President Harris would be cool, make all these flag-lovers stand and salute a black woman.
social media might not be the right thing to blame for polarization.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.us...political-polarization-in-america?context=amp
social media might not be the right thing to blame for polarization.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.us...political-polarization-in-america?context=amp
Its the Internet itself to blame; not social media in particular.
I thought the article implied that Fox is to blame because the largest effect of political radicalization has been in the elderly (the most radicalized cohort starts at age 75, while Fox News' median habitual viewer age is 72).
Yeah, this sounds familiar. One of the drip drip drip pieces Mueller almost certainly has by now.
I think it goes back further than that. Southern Strategy and all.Like most modern problems I blame polarization on Reagan
This was posted by another gaffer in the Kelly thread but thought it was worth posting here as well
As much as Reagan sucked, that wasn't really his doing. The Dems and the liberal/left wing had a lot of issues over the course of the '70s (even setting aside the racist civil rights backlash) that ended up biting them in the ass and helping to flip a generation to the GOP. Bombings all over, treatment of vets coming home, Carter's utterly ineffective presidency, etc.Like most modern problems I blame polarization on Reagan
As much as Reagan sucked, that wasn't really his doing. The Dems and the liberal/left wing had a lot of issues over the course of the '70s (even setting aside the racist civil rights backlash) that ended up biting them in the ass and helping to flip a generation to the GOP. Bombings all over, treatment of vets coming home, Carter's utterly ineffective presidency, etc.
No, we can just bring up still having to deal w/ boos at the DNC in 2016.Are we going to bring up right wing myths about spitting on vets again?
Like most modern problems I blame polarization on Reagan
Fox news and rush did far more damage imo.
As much as Reagan sucked, that wasn't really his doing. The Dems and the liberal/left wing had a lot of issues over the course of the '70s (even setting aside the racist civil rights backlash) that ended up biting them in the ass and helping to flip a generation to the GOP. Bombings all over, treatment of vets coming home, Carter's utterly ineffective presidency, etc.
No, we can just bring up still having to deal w/ boos at the DNC in 2016.
Fox wouldn't be able to operate as it currently does if the Fairness Doctrine was still in place, and that was repealed by, guess who...
I think it goes back further than that. Southern Strategy and all.
The Civil Rights movement has basically defined US politics for the last 60 years.
I mean if you really want to be thorough, slavery was at the root of the Constitution, but white people being uneasy with liberals' open, broad support for equal rights as a regular theme is kind of a recent shift.
As much as Reagan sucked, that wasn't really his doing. The Dems and the liberal/left wing had a lot of issues over the course of the '70s (even setting aside the racist civil rights backlash) that ended up biting them in the ass and helping to flip a generation to the GOP. Bombings all over, treatment of vets coming home, Carter's utterly ineffective presidency, etc.
Fox wouldn't be able to operate as it currently does if the Fairness Doctrine was still in place, and that was repealed by, guess who...
Oh, absolutely. I was pointing out that there were self-inflicted wounds that pushed people off of the Dems at the time as well for other reasons. It's very much the impetus of the swap to a GOP-dominated country for the past 60 years.Reagan did is part to push things further. He launched his Presidential campaign in Philadelphia, Mississippi where he extolled the virtues of "state's rights". He rose that racial division a narrow win in Mississippi (under 12,000 votes).
He knew exactly what he was doing.
Fairness Doctrine was an FCC reg, so it applied to broadcast networks. Wouldnt have affected Fox News.Fox wouldn't be able to operate as it currently does if the Fairness Doctrine was still in place, and that was repealed by, guess who...
The internet would have effectively killed it anyway regardless of what Reagan did. It just accellerated the timeline.The fairness doctrine had too much chilling effect on free speech imo, regardless of what positive impact it would have on shitty news outlets like fox.
The internet would have effectively killed it anyway regardless of what Reagan did. It just accellerated the timeline.
We can't put the genie back in the bottle. News and information is spread the way it is now, and there's nothing anyone can really do about it. Strictly regulating would be illegal or if not eventually lead to really immoral practices.
The landscape is now the way it is. We need to adapt to it. Cannot be so unprepared to handle the oppositions tactics as we were last time.
A black woman. None of these people would give shit to the lady in a cowboy hat with a Purple Heart bandaid on her chin from the 04 republican convention.Why do men in cowboy hats keep making fun of women in cowboy hats?
Like that dumbass literally is wearing one on his profipe pic
We can't put the genie back in the bottle. News and information is spread the way it is now, and there's nothing anyone can really do about it. Strictly regulating would be illegal or if not eventually lead to really immoral practices.
The landscape is now the way it is. We need to adapt to it. Cannot be so unprepared to handle the oppositions tactics as we were last time.
Forcing Facebook/Twitter to abide by US laws regarding foreign countries buying political ads is an entirely different thing together.This sounds an awful lot like a justification for DC to roll over for Facebook and Twitter's lobbyists.
I think we might be looking at the past with rose colored glasses. I'm no scholar on the subject, but I've heard people say politics in the past was no picnic either.