It's weird that this is the thing in that interview that prompted the thread. I believe that was also the only usage of the term "political correctness" in the entire interview, as well.
It's a historically loaded term, and was poisoned early in its life much like "Social Justice Warrior" has been poisoned now. Hopefully when we repeat history further on in the 21st century, we'll remix the dumb shit with a little more aplomb than that particular example.
Usually what happens is the phrase "Political Correctness" is used, and that's more often than not a signal for people who think life's gotten more unfair now that marginalized people aren't willing to stay marginalized for the sake of you having a cheap ha-ha at their expense.
And I used the word "cheap" there on purpose. There's a reason. What stand-ups do isn't cheap, usually. It's work. It's their way of life. Rock mentions having to workshop his jokes. He doesn't just fart them out at work, or burp them up on twitter and call it a day. He works on his shit, and like he says, so does EVERY OTHER STAND-UP HE KNOWS.
When those guys are taking subjects that can be touchy, and trying to figure out how to mine legitmate laughs from them, that's not cheap. That's not thoughtless. They're putting a ton of thought into their art, and hoping it helps give their career more fuel to continue on, keeping them paid, keeping them secure.
This is not really all that comparable to you feeling upset because you shit up a thread with the first "edgy" thing that popped into your ass and people called you out on the stink.
And that's usually what happens when discussions about comedy and "political correctness" pop up. Because it's not really about comedy, or political correctness. It's just another avenue for whiners to whine about how unfair it is that they don't get to be giant fucking assholes to less fortunate people without repercussion.
It's the type of thing that drives people to "both sides suck!" because both sides have a large number of obnoxious dogmatist types who are not fun to be around and are impossible to please.Chris Rock's definition of conservative is something interesting that I hadn't considered before.
YAAAASSS!Not in their political views — not like they’re voting Republican — but in their social views and their willingness not to offend anybody. Kids raised on a culture of “We’re not going to keep score in the game because we don’t want anybody to lose.” Or just ignoring race to a fault. You can’t say “the black kid over there.” No, it’s “the guy with the red shoes.” You can’t even be offensive on your way to being inoffensive.
I hate how in threads like this devolve into "people are too sensitive these days" rants. Obviously if someone tells you that calling someone "black" in terms of African-Americans is wrong, they can fuck off.
But fighting "political correctness" doesn't give you an excuse to make fun of marginalized people. Not being able to say a joke about black/latino people is not "being oppressed by political correctness," it's called not being a shithole.
Obviously the "politically correct" line is subjective, but if people are constantly telling you to be "politically correct" and not say certain things, maybe it's because you're being a dick and not that everyone else is coddled.
This isn't a generation of babies who cry at everything. This is a generation of people stating "hey, what you're saying is fucked up and you should stop saying that."
Or, alternatively, maybe it does. I can tell when someone is being intentionally harmful to another person. This is not always the case.Obviously the "politically correct" line is subjective, but if people are constantly telling you to be "politically correct" and not say certain things, maybe it's because you're being a dick and not that everyone else is coddled.
Or, alternatively, maybe it does. I can tell when someone is being intentionally harmful to another person. This is not always the case.
You may need glasses because the bolded has nothing to do with me.We need more discussion about wife beating and Holocaust revisionism around, don't we.
You may need glasses because the bolded has nothing to do with me.
I hate any law that prohibits expression of any idea. That is not Holocaust revisionism.You hate the anti-Holocaust revisionism laws because "muh free speech" tho.
i like this because people ripped his statement about political correctness right out of its context with regard to comedic work and its relation to the audience and then used it as a means of defending themselves after theyre racist or sexist or homophobic on neogaf dot com lol
While Chris is right I feel like those statements are going to backfire like his n**** vs black people joke.
I hate how in threads like this devolve into "people are too sensitive these days" rants. Obviously if someone tells you that calling someone "black" in terms of African-Americans is wrong, they can fuck off.
But fighting "political correctness" doesn't give you an excuse to make fun of marginalized people. Not being able to say a joke about black/latino people is not "being oppressed by political correctness," it's called not being a shithole.
Obviously the "politically correct" line is subjective, but if people are constantly telling you to be "politically correct" and not say certain things, maybe it's because you're being a dick and not that everyone else is coddled.
This isn't a generation of babies who cry at everything. This is a generation of people stating "hey, what you're saying is fucked up and you should stop saying that."
"Social justice" is the new "politically correct." It's about trying to shout down anyone who says something that might be offensive to anyone else (regardless of whether you are personally offended), and it's about having absolutely zero sense of humor or irony.
I saw Lisa Lampanelli a few weeks ago. Packed house, tons of "problematic" humor. Everyone had a good time and it never really felt that hateful or mean-spirited. I kinda wonder what the point is in launching angry Twitter PR campaigns against Stephen Colbert over some uber-mild joke when there are still people like Lampanelli and Trey Parker/Matt Stone making careers out of pretty flagrantly racist and sexist material. I tend to just assume the social justice crowd is in such an echo chamber that they've forgotten about all the worst offenders.
I'm one of those you would call marginalized and I think political correctness has gone too far. This oversensitivity hasn't really helped the cause for equality it has just helped sweep real racism under the rug.
The more you satire and joke about racism, stereotypes, politics, or taboo subjects the more absurd they become.
The real racism/offensive shit is the shit that you will never see coming.
I agree that joking about race is important (being black, some of my jokes touch on race), but I don't see how allowing more voices at the table is stifling progress on race/gender/LGBT issues.
Someone saying "hey I don't like it when you call me a (insert derogatory term) is probably saying so because that term isn't intended to keep someone on an equal level.
The way I see it, in the past, you had one dominant set of norms curated by one subset of the population. Now, voices that were once silenced or dismissed as silly (she wasn't raped, she just didn't like the guy) are now at least treated with some bit of truth. I don't see how this is hurting voices that were once too scared to speak up and out.
Instead of asking "why can't I say/do thing that is now considered bad", try asking "why might that person and many other people now think this thing is bad?" odds are that the group thought the term/action was offensive before, but were too marginalized to risk speaking out.
It's troubling that empathy is considered a bad thing now.
It's not good to downplay the power of words, considering that our society moves due to language. Words do have power. Right now we're seeing Hannibal's bit finally causing serious discussion about Cosby's rape allegations. All from a stand-up set.
We don't need jokes to make racism absurd, because racism by its very nature is already absurd enough.
Our society maintaining a 1940's definition of racism is what stifles conversation. Nothing can be deemed racially motivated unless the person is running down the street yelling nigger in blackface with a noose in one hand and a burning cross in the other.
I wish we could finally address how discriminatory housing practices in the mid 1900s contributed to our segregated cities, or how disproportionate mass incarceration and drug law enforcement helps cripple communities of color, but because this is boring, slow, occasionally unintentional racism (and not cartoonish, obvious racism) we can't even agree that it's a problem.
Chris Rock's definition of conservative is something interesting that I hadn't considered before.
Summed up my thoughts on it(Sort of a tangent on comedy, and then I'll circle back): I don't really love the term political correctness or "social justice warrior" in general, because it seems to come from a place where people don't have a right to take issue with anything and a lack of empathy for groups who might have a justifiable issue with something. I generally see it as passive and dismissive.
That being said, comedy requires context, and most should be given an artistic license that can convey satire or the like. That doesn't necessarily mean that anything a comedian says should be shielded from any criticism, but many times critics of "controversial" comedy don't take the time to understand the context of that joke. In that sense, I don't see them as a victim of political correctness, but instead sheer stupidity.
Chris Rock's definition of conservative is something interesting that I hadn't considered before.
You aren't kidding. A failed attempt at drama is one thing - you get a product that's maybe boring or stilted, or maybe even comedic. But a bad attempt at comedy? That can hurt in horrible, unsalvageable ways.Really liked the part about Gone Girl vs Anchorman. A lot more people could have made Gone Girl work compared to making Anchorman work. Comedy is harder than drama, and yet it never gets the respect it deserves.
"Conservative" and "liberal" have thuout their entire histories as words been incredibly maleable and everchanging, much to the horror and shame of those who define their politcal selves entirely by the aegis of those terms.
Some dude wrote a book on that. Conservative and Liberal was invented in the 1960s by William F. Buckley Jr. when he got into politics and was working on revitalizing the Republican party image and framing the pro-federal Eisenhower/Roosevelt style of government (New Deal Liberalism) as detrimental to the longevity of the nation, etc, etc. And claiming that he and his "Conservative" ilk are the preservers of the Constitutional Republic, Libertarians and Anti-Communists like Goldwater used him and his media holdings as a sort of public relations resource and it sort of helped change the entire course of the Republican party.
starting but not stopping with how we talk and use the words conservative and liberal. Kind of 1984 spooky when you think about it. New speak and all that.
While Chris is right I feel like those statements are going to backfire like his n**** vs black people joke.
I kinda wonder what the point is in launching angry Twitter PR campaigns against Stephen Colbert over some uber-mild joke when there are still people like Lampanelli and Trey Parker/Matt Stone making careers out of pretty flagrantly racist and sexist material. I tend to just assume the social justice crowd is in such an echo chamber that they've forgotten about all the worst offenders.
Liberal was around well before 1960. Milton Friedman fought the war to take back "liberal" from Democrats for decades with plenty of others with him. It was kind of silly.
I'm talking in context of how the words are used today socially and in politics. i.e. "The Eternal Struggle" between Capital L Liberals and Capital C Conservatives that has controlled politics for the last 50 years. I mean yeah both words have been around for a while. Used as strong adjectives and power words, associations with liberty, security, etc. 19th Century style liberalism was a bit more laissez-faire, but early 20th century Republican conservatism would be considered a little soft for today's crowd. Certainly not the Type-A Captain America New Conservatives
anyway, that was my whole point.
I agree that joking about race is important (being black, some of my jokes touch on race), but I don't see how allowing more voices at the table is stifling progress on race/gender/LGBT issues.
Someone saying "hey I don't like it when you call me a (insert derogatory term) is probably saying so because that term isn't intended to keep someone on an equal level.
The way I see it, in the past, you had one dominant set of norms curated by one subset of the population. Now, voices that were once silenced or dismissed as silly (she wasn't raped, she just didn't like the guy) are now at least treated with some bit of truth. I don't see how this is hurting voices that were once too scared to speak up and out.
Instead of asking "why can't I say/do thing that is now considered bad", try asking "why might that person and many other people now think this thing is bad?" odds are that the group thought the term/action was offensive before, but were too marginalized to risk speaking out.
It's troubling that empathy is considered a bad thing now.
It's not good to downplay the power of words, considering that our society moves due to language. Words do have power. Right now we're seeing Hannibal's bit finally causing serious discussion about Cosby's rape allegations. All from a stand-up set.
We don't need jokes to make racism absurd, because racism by its very nature is already absurd enough.
Our society maintaining a 1940's definition of racism is what stifles conversation. Nothing can be deemed racially motivated unless the person is running down the street yelling nigger in blackface with a noose in one hand and a burning cross in the other.
I wish we could finally address how discriminatory housing practices in the mid 1900s contributed to our segregated cities, or how disproportionate mass incarceration and drug law enforcement helps cripple communities of color, but because this is boring, slow, occasionally unintentional racism (and not cartoonish, obvious racism) we can't even agree that it's a problem.
My god it's like there is absolutely no knowledge of history...
Yeah, that is true and it really has been kind of weird. I misread your post.
I understand what you're trying to say and agree with a lot of it especially the last part. However I feel like the pendulum has swung too far to the point that comedians, and artists in general are second guessing themselves. We need people to be edgy and push the line when it comes to everyone from sex, race, religion, stereotypes, politics, whatever. I'm Latino but I'm also an artist and nothing is more frustrating than having to change something you're making because someone thinks it offensive.
Phoenix, that's how I see it. I tend to separate art especially comedy and satire from regular life.
I understand what you're trying to say and agree with a lot of it especially the last part. However I feel like the pendulum has swung too far to the point that comedians, and artists in general are second guessing themselves. We need people to be edgy and push the line when it comes to everyone from sex, race, religion, stereotypes, politics, whatever. I'm Latino but I'm also an artist and nothing is more frustrating than having to change something you're making because someone thinks it offensive.
Phoenix, that's how I see it. I tend to separate art especially comedy and satire from regular life.
It's weird that this is the thing in that interview that prompted the thread. I believe that was also the only usage of the term "political correctness" in the entire interview, as well.
It's a historically loaded term, and was poisoned early in its life much like "Social Justice Warrior" has been poisoned now. Hopefully when we repeat history further on in the 21st century, we'll remix the dumb shit with a little more aplomb than that particular example.
Usually what happens is the phrase "Political Correctness" is used, and that's more often than not a signal for people who think life's gotten more unfair now that marginalized people aren't willing to stay marginalized for the sake of you having a cheap ha-ha at their expense.
And I used the word "cheap" there on purpose. There's a reason. What stand-ups do isn't cheap, usually. It's work. It's their way of life. Rock mentions having to workshop his jokes. He doesn't just fart them out at work, or burp them up on twitter and call it a day. He works on his shit, and like he says, so does EVERY OTHER STAND-UP HE KNOWS.
When those guys are taking subjects that can be touchy, and trying to figure out how to mine legitmate laughs from them, that's not cheap. That's not thoughtless. They're putting a ton of thought into their art, and hoping it helps give their career more fuel to continue on, keeping them paid, keeping them secure.
This is not really all that comparable to you feeling upset because you shit up a thread with the first "edgy" thing that popped into your ass and people called you out on the stink.
And that's usually what happens when discussions about comedy and "political correctness" pop up. Because it's not really about comedy, or political correctness. It's just another avenue for whiners to whine about how unfair it is that they don't get to be giant fucking assholes to less fortunate people without repercussion.
if the actor writes the story/dialogue...Judging a comedian for their jokes, is like judging an actor for the role they're in.
I understand what you're trying to say and agree with a lot of it especially the last part. However I feel like the pendulum has swung too far to the point that comedians, and artists in general are second guessing themselves. We need people to be edgy and push the line when it comes to everyone from sex, race, religion, stereotypes, politics, whatever. I'm Latino but I'm also an artist and nothing is more frustrating than having to change something you're making because someone thinks it offensive.
Phoenix, that's how I see it. I tend to separate art especially comedy and satire from regular life.
And that's usually what happens when discussions about comedy and "political correctness" pop up. Because it's not really about comedy, or political correctness. It's just another avenue for whiners to whine about how unfair it is that they don't get to be giant fucking assholes to less fortunate people without repercussion.